Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1 Date of the infringement 31 March 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 8 April 2024   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 15 April 2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Y   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Y   7 Who is the parking company? Horizon   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Iceland Chester   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Horizon parking Horizon Iceland Chester.pdf
    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BNP on BBC Question Time


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not me! :-x

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont agree with the BNP - however Nick Griffin did get elected to the Euro parliament in the Euro elections, therefore he has a right to be heard.

If we start denying people the chance to be heard, who have been voted in by the democratic process in elections, then that is a very dangerous path to go down indeed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont agree with the BNP - however Nick Griffin did get elected to the Euro parliament in the Euro elections, therefore he has a right to be heard.

If we start denying people the chance to be heard, who have been voted in by the democratic process in elections, then that is a very dangerous path to go down indeed.

 

Agreed ................... I dislike the guy but when you claim to be democratic & then refuse to hear or allow someone like him to voice a view no matter how abhorrent then your no better than them & your certainly not actually a democrat

Link to post
Share on other sites

With respect to all - i doubt he is stupid, he is Cambridge educated.

He has views that are vile, but i doubt he'll be shown to be stupid on there tomorrow night.

 

He'll probably get shouted down by the so called 'democrats' in the audience

Link to post
Share on other sites

however Nick Griffin did get elected to the Euro parliament in the Euro elections, therefore he has a right to be heard.

 

 

That's what BBC were saying. I bet he'll be on. They won't want to lose viewing figures, lots will watch as its so controversial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the rise of the nazi party in 1940m was because the people at the time had high unemployment, they blamed no jobs on foreign labour, etc etc

 

the german goverment jailed them and gagged what at the end of the day was free speach.

 

dont you think that is whats happening now

 

not to that extreame but gagging a legal political party who speaks what voters want addressed is not the answer

 

 

THOSE WHO FORGET HISTORY ARE DESTINED TO REPEAT IT

 

LET THE IDIOT SPEAK AND BE SHOWN UP FOR THE PERSON THAT HE IS

 

WE MAY NOT LIKE HIS POLICIES

 

BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE DO

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the idiots remarks on the news today regarding his Nazis comments. A black humoured joke? He does have a right to be heard as he was elected and lets hope the morons who did elect his backward party in can see the man for what he truly is; a sad pathetic narrow minded fool.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because someone is Cambridge educated does not mean they aren't stupid.

People can be stupid in many different ways - I am an intelligent lady in many respects I have an IQ of 158 but am stupid with maths even failing maths GCSE twice.

 

I actually think everytime he opens his mouth he is made to look stupid as most of his policies are without substance and unworkable in everyday society.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like i say Jan..if the main parties were not failing these people in certain areas in the 1st place, then the BNP would not have got into office no matter how much canvassing it did.

 

True in many cases - but I also think that the BNP are actively targetting people who wouldn't normally vote for anyone at all ... but maybe that's not a bad thing because its making others vote just to keep BNP out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ill spell it out

 

people seem to be reluctant

 

people are concerned with imagration and the effect its having

 

if the political parties will not speak it, what hope is there

 

are the us racist with having a mexican border and not a closed canadian border

 

are the australians racist with there policies

 

they allow controlled imagration and it works with out being branded facists

 

why not in the uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like i say Jan..if the main parties were not failing these people in certain areas in the 1st place, then the BNP would not have got into office no matter how much canvassing it did.

 

Unfortunately no political party is ever going to be perfect or make every single resident of the UK happy - but I say better the devil you know the the racist homophobe you don't!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the whole point

 

this goverment just like the last are ignoring the concerns of the voters in all aspects of daily life

be it schools, debt, what ever

 

while this happens you will allways have a protest vote

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ill spell it out

 

people seem to be reluctant

 

people are concerned with imagration and the effect its having

 

if the political parties will not speak it, what hope is there

 

are the us racist with having a mexican border and not a closed canadian border

 

are the australians racist with there policies

 

they allow controlled imagration and it works with out being branded facists

 

why not in the uk

 

There is a major difference between controlled immigration and what the BNP are trying to create.

 

Look back at what this man has said since 2001 - he would like an all white Britain. Thats not just controlling immigration - thats controlling race and creating the "perfect" society - just one step away from the blue eyed blonde haired society that Hitler idealised.

 

And as I have neither I would be pretty damn worried!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...