Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks hon. If it wasnt for your articulation, I would be nowhere.. I'm more of a hands on person, and writing letters / emails etc, would leave me bewildered..

 

Give me a computer to fix any day of the week lol..

 

Will send this off now, and let you know of the outcomes, both from jacobs, with the partner letter, and also this one to the council.

 

thanks again, have a great day

be safe

nige :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

not 100% sure about this

 

 

Charging for debt collection

 

2.10 (a) claiming collection costs from a debtor in the absence of express contractual or other legal provision

 

b. misleading debtors into believing they are legally liable to pay collection charges when this is not the case, for example, when there is no contractual provision

 

c. not giving an indication in credit agreements of the amount of any charges payable on def

 

d. applying unreasonable charges, for example, charges not based on actual and necessary costs

 

e. applying charges which are disproportionate to the main debt.

 

you might find something here to help you

Professionalism and conduct of the enforcement agent

 

  • Enforcement agents should always produce relevant identification on request, such as a badge or ID card, together with a written authorisation to act on behalf of the creditor.
  • Enforcement agents must act within the law at all times, including all defined legislation and observe all health and safety requirements in carrying out enforcement. They must maintain strict client confidentiality and comply with Data Protection legislation and, where appropriate the Freedom of Information Act.
  • Enforcement agents, for the purpose of distress or execution shall, without the use of unlawful force, gain access to the goods. The enforcement agent will produce an inventory of the goods seized and leave it with the debtor, or at the premises, with any other documents that are required by regulations or statute.
  • Enforcement agents must carry out their duties in a professional, calm and dignified manner. They must dress appropriately and act with discretion and fairness.
  • Enforcement agents must not misrepresent their powers, qualifications, capacities, experience or abilities.
  • Enforcement agents must not discriminate unfairly on any grounds including those of age, disability, ethnicity, gender, race, religion or sexual orientation.
  • In circumstances where the enforcement agency requires it, and always where there have been previous acts of, or threats of violence by a debtor, a risk assessment should be undertaken prior to the enforcement agent attending a debtor's premises

Vulnerable situations

 

  • Enforcement agents/agencies and creditors must recognise that they each have a role in ensuring that the vulnerable and socially excluded are protected and that the recovery process includes procedures agreed between the agent/agency and creditor about how such situations should be dealt with. The appropriate use of discretion is essential in every case and no amount of guidance could cover every situation, therefore the agent has a duty to contact the creditor and report the circumstances in situations where there is potential cause for concern. If necessary, the enforcement agent will advise the creditor iffurther action is appropriate. The exercise of appropriate discretion is needed, not only to protect the debtor, but also the enforcement agent who should avoid taking action which could lead to accusations of inappropriate behaviour.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can remove the 2.10 parts a, and b from the email. That isnt a problem.

 

As for the remainder you kindly sent, at the moment I dont think it applies, as he has not entered the property, and never will basically.

 

The only issue I have is the vunerable situation. I have only spoke to this guy on teh phone, never seen him, and dont want to personally. so i'm not 100% sure what I could do with that info.. but thanks for sending it anyhow :)

 

I have tipped your scales hallow, but it wont let me do it again for you andie, till i spread some 'love' around. Please rest assured when I can I will :)

 

thanks again friends :)

 

be safe nige :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

Just received a email off Jacobs, saying the following.. This is in receipt of the mail to the partners..

 

Dear Mr JGG

JACOBS REFERENCE NUMBERS:- xxxx & xxxx

Please find attached a copy of statements for your account which have also been sent in the post.

We have been instructed by the Local Authority to collect the above accounts on their behalf and so all payments regarding said accounts should be made to us. We have been notified by Salford City Council of one payment made to them of £250.00 and have adjusted your account accordingly. If you are disputing the accounts then please contact them direct.

We are not governed by the Office of Fair Trading and as we are acting on a Liability Order issued by the Magistrates Court our actions are not harrassment.

Mr Bailiff has returned your accounts to our office, however we are unable to return the accounts to Salford City Council unless instructed to do so by them. In order to prevent further recovery action, please contact our office immediately with your sensible proposals to clear the outstanding balance.

We trust the above is satisfactory and look forward to speaking to you soon.

Yours faithfully

JACOBS CERTIFICATED BAILIFFS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst they may not be "governed" by the OFT you have every right to make complaints which may or may not be acted upon or used as a decider when it comes to issuing a licence.

 

And for my part that stupid comment is now worth a response akin to - OK well you're not governed by the OFT but you and your bailiffs are governed by the court so a Form 4 complaint is coming your way.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

jacobs1.jpg

 

Letter re 2008/9's account

 

jacobs2.jpg

 

Statement of fees. No mention of the visit on the 9th October

 

jacobs3.jpg

 

Letter re 2009/10's account

 

jacobs4.jpg

 

Statement of fees. Again no mention of the visit on the 9th October

Edited by jo1lygrngiant
Mistakes made when posting originally.. Pulled my finger out this time ;)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely, if the OFT have issued guidance to the consumer credit licence holder in the debt ocllection industry, then Jacobs are goverened by them?, or am I reading this the way I want to read it, and they are not governed by them?

 

Link to this is www.oft.gov.uk/advice_and_resources/resource_base/legal/cca/debt-collection

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bailiff cant charge visit fees on the same day for both accounts

multiple charges are not allowed

 

Even if they cannot charge visit fees on teh same day for both accounts, wouldnt they have mentioned a visit date on the actual statement?, or would this be shown on the screen shot?, which is the next thing i'm thinking of asking for ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

would that show all activity.. ie details of conversations, letters etc?, if not would a Subject Access Request do the trick?..

it wont show details of conversations

you have a copy of the letters from the bailiff showing the extra charges he added

I would write a letter to the court that certificated him and send copy's of the letters from Jacobs with there charges and his letters with his charges and ask if it be can put on his file for the judge to see when he next renews his certificate

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks hallow. Consider it done. Well it will be on Monday. I really need to start work now, been working on this since approx 6am this morning, and have done none of my usual work.. :(.. Looks like its going to be a long hard slog till about midnight to play catch up lol

 

thanks again. have a great day.

speak soon. be safe nige :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ha.. same here hallow. Ive got customers chasing me left right and centre for their computers.. phone going literally non stop, with customer queries, currently working in 5 pc's and a laptop.. just not enough hours in a day.. ahh well..

 

 

i wish you lived near me then you could fix my sons laptop

he dropped it and the hard drive broken

he his well pxxxxd as it has photo's of a work injury on it and really needs them a well known firm has said it will cost £100 to recover them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, Just an update for you.

 

After sending off the email, that Andie kindly wrote for me, and having no response off them, I sent a chasing mail on Monday.

 

Just received a call off the council, stating that as long as I pay jacobs their fees of £42.50, the council will accept the account back off jacobs.

 

The council also, want a total breakdown of my income, which is all benefit related in any case.

 

So a cheque, is winging its way over to jacobs, the account will be passed back to the council, and alls well again :)

 

Thank you so much once again for all the help, I really do appreciate it :)

 

Take care for now

be safe

nige :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, Just an update for you.

 

After sending off the email, that Andie kindly wrote for me, and having no response off them, I sent a chasing mail on Monday.

 

Just received a call off the council, stating that as long as I pay jacobs their fees of £42.50, the council will accept the account back off jacobs.

 

The council also, want a total breakdown of my income, which is all benefit related in any case.

 

So a cheque, is winging its way over to jacobs, the account will be passed back to the council, and alls well again :)

 

Thank you so much once again for all the help, I really do appreciate it :)

 

Take care for now

be safe

nige :)

 

 

result well done

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...