Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

McCarthybaby vs Halifax cc PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5257 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I have today received my SAR details re my halifax cc card. Love getting these special packages through the post lol.

 

So i have had a look through and come up with the following figures if someone would like to have a look and tell me if these are correct would be fab.

 

Can not find APR on printed statements but have taken apr off of terms and conditions which states 17.9%

 

22.09.03 - 5.20

23.10.03 - 9.54

21.11.03 - 6.58

22.12.03 - 8.70

23.01.04 - 8.83

20.02.04 - 9.02

22.03.04 - 9.13

22.04.04 - 9.15

21.05.04 - 8.88

22.06.04 - 9.08

22.07.04 - 9.10

23.08.04 - 9.07

22.09.04 - 9.73

22.10.04 - 10.10

22.11.04 - 9.50

20.12.04 - 9.71

24.01.06 - 10.31

 

so after using the calculators and added contractual and then stat interest i came up with...................

 

575.51???

 

is this right?

 

also been trying to find a template letter to use for credit cards if anyone has got one or can point me in the right direction would be fab!

 

thanks

 

mcc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get £596.04 so only £20 out!! :p

 

a word of warning regarding Halifax, when I asked for my PPI back they finally offered it as the old "good will gesture" but applied simple interest to the monthly premiums, then the 8% simple on top.

 

This meant that the interest they worked out over 3 years worth of PPI was less than the 8% amount, couldn't work that one out :confused:

 

we couldn't agree so now it's gone to the FOS.

 

I didn't really use a template letter as such, because my complaint was the lack of info in my SAR response regarding the PPI. Basically they sent nothing. As they sent no info I made a complaint and demanded the PPI back, and it just went from there really.

 

Have a look around this area of the forum, I'm sure there will be some letters on some of the threads, good luck!

 

Birch :)

9-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent:o !! Lloyds and Halifax!

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Capital One

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax Card Services

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Marbles

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax (Birchave0's sis)

8-3-07 PPI refund Lloyds TSB Loan £1200 + £2900 off loan balance

22-5-07 Halifax *Won* £1025

23-9-07 Goldfish 8k balance written off, £2300 PPI + charges returned, no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are template letters I will post a link...

 

Bank Templates Library

 

The links and template letters are mainly aimed at bank charges but you can actually use some of them in cases of PPI claims. Such as Letter Before Action. Non Compliance with SAR etc.

 

PPI is a difficult baby to handle so many different issues to handle. Timescales, brokers, online forms, consumer credit agreements, terms and conditions, timescales, mortgages, loans, credit cards, pre ticked boxes online, failure by sales personnel to ensure correct questions asked on the customer needs and wants survey, employment status, alternative insurance options, pre existing medical conditions :D just to name a few that have come up on this forum.

 

Do not let me put you off with what I have posted. To date I have recovered nearly £18k and still have 5 ongoing fights for PPI reclaims and another 3 on bank charges. So chin up get into full reclaiming mode and away and get your money back.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have drafted this letter if someone could perhaps take a look and give input where necessary?

 

thanks

 

Dear sir madam

 

Thankyou for the details you supplied me under my Subject Access Request 16.10.09. I have studied all documents provided and it has become apparent that I was paying protection insurance on my account. Since 1999 I have been diagnosed with a pre-medical condition that would have made me exempt from any insurance policy. Please see attached letter from my consultant to confirm dates.

I believe that I was mis sold this information as your sales person made no enquiries unto my medical history past or present at that time. If they had it would have been apparent to them that I would not have met the criteria and therefore would have been ineligible.

I now believe that the premium PPI policy attached to my account was extremely unfair and totally unreasonable and offered me very little, if any protection value whatsoever. I am therefore requesting a full refund of monies that have been paid and the interest added to these payments at the rate of 17.9% as per your terms and conditions.

Furthermore as I believe that I have unlawfully been deprived of this money, I also expect the repayment of the interest at the statutory interest rate of 8% applicable to each of the payments made.

I have included a list of all payment amounts and dates below for your perusal. I have also added on the contractual interest on to each payment amount and then the statutory rate. Therefore I am asking for a refund to the sum of £596.04.

 

22.09.03 - £5.20

23.10.03 - £9.54

21.11.03 - £6.58

22.12.03 - £8.70

23.01.04 - £8.83

20.02.04 - £9.02

22.03.04 - £9.13

22.04.04 - £9.15

21.05.04 - £8.88

22.06.04 - £9.08

22.07.04 - £9.10

23.08.04 - £9.07

22.09.04 - £9.73

22.10.04 - £10.10

22.11.04 - £9.50

20.12.04 - £9.71

24.01.06 - £10.31

I look forward to receiving a positive response from you within 14 days.

 

 

This is my first attempt at writing this sort of letter so hopefully i am not too far off the mark.

 

 

Any advice on it much appreciated

 

 

thanks

 

 

Leah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the details you supplied to me under my Subject Access Request 16.10.09. I have studied all of the documents provided and it (has become apparent) is now obvious having scrutinised the documents that I was paying protection insurance on my account. Since 1999 I have been diagnosed with a pre-medical condition that would have (made me exempt from) precluded me from making a valid claim on any insurance policy. Please see attached letter from my consultant to confirm dates.

 

I believe that I was mis sold this (information) Payment Protection Insurance as your sales person made no enquiries (unto) with regard to my medical history, past or present at that time. If they had it would have been (apparent) glaringly obvious to them that I would not have met the criteria to make a valid claim and therefore I would have been ineligible to receive the cover I was being charged for

.

I now believe that the premium PPI policy attached to my account was extremely unfair and totally unreasonable and offered me very little, if any protection value whatsoever. I am therefore requesting a full refund of monies that have been paid and the interest added to these payments at the rate of 17.9% as per your terms and conditions.

 

Furthermore as I believe that I have unlawfully been deprived of this money, I also expect the repayment of the interest at the statutory interest rate of 8% applicable to each of the payments made.

 

I have included a list of all payment amounts and dates below for your perusal. I have also added on the contractual interest on to each payment amount and then the statutory rate. Therefore I am asking for a refund to the sum of £596.04.

 

I have tweaked for your consideration. You may wish to change the red to blue but at the end of the day it is your letter.

 

Good luck anyway. ;)

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...