Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA stopped after ESA medical??***WON***


mazbck
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4408 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

@ patrickq1

 

Sorry but I'm not the Atos healthcare wallah, I'm Paul - username loan ranger.

The Atos wallah's account is something I c&p'd from this page of the Guardian.

 

Just wanted to make this clear. Regards,

Paul.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yes i realised later when i re read it lone ranger lol did nt you used have a website a few years ago all about the dwp etc ?

Thanks for remembering. Yeah, I still do a similar website. I won't post the link here because the mods might object, but a yahoo search for "crisis loan bdc phone number" puts the site in 1st and 2nd position. Anyone interested in visiting my website can find it by clicking on my CAG user name and viewing my profile/contact info.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok something strange happened today.

 

Appeal is on Tuesday, Motobility have said that if it goes wrong they will pick car up on Thursday. Road tax runs out at the end of the month, yet although we have a 'date' on Thursday for the pick up of the car if it goes pear shaped, we got the new Tax Disc in the post today!!!!!

 

Why would they send one out if it was due to be picked up on thursday??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for remembering. Yeah, I still do a similar website. I won't post the link here because the mods might object, but a yahoo search for "crisis loan bdc phone number" puts the site in 1st and 2nd position. Anyone interested in visiting my website can find it by clicking on my CAG user name and viewing my profile/contact info.

 

Paul - your website is fine. We'd have to intervene if you started spamming the link in varying threads, came here with the sole purpose of promoting your site, turned the site commercial or was spouting incorrect information.

 

You've been here a while, you come to help people when you can, you don't spam, it's not commercial, the information on it is accurate (good research) - so there is no problem, and you are welcome to post a link on this thread. Why don't you pop it into the "useful links" stickies at the top of the forum - anyone can add one.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi erika ...have you heard from postjg i am just wondering how he got on with Atos court hearing....

 

Aren't we all.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JUST HOPE HE HAS NOT BEEN DISSAPOINTED...SOME OF HIS WORK ON HERE HAS BEEN VERY HELPFULL

...

ANYONE WANTING THE DLA CODES HERE THEY ARE

DLA and AA reason codes

 

Care reason codes

 

Favourable Indefinite award DLA only

 

C01 Low Limited care - child

C02 Low Limited care in connection with bodily functions

C03 Low Limited care to plan or prepare main meal

C20 Middle Day attention

C21 Middle Day supervision

C22 Middle Night attention

C24 Middle Renal dialysis

C27 Middle Night watching over

C30 High Night attention/Day attention

C31 High Night attention/Day supervision

C32 High Night watching over/Day attention

C34 High Night watching over/Day supervision

C37 High Award under Special Rules

 

Favourable Fixed award DLA only

 

C41 Low Limited care - child

C42 Low Limited care in connection with bodily functions

C43 Low Limited care to plan or prepare main meal

C80 Middle Day attention

C81 Middle Day supervision

C82 Middle Night attention

C84 Middle Renal dialysis

C87 Middle Night watching over

C90 High Night attention/Day attention

C91 High Night attention/Day supervision

C92 High Night watching over/Day attention

C94 High Night watching over/Day supervision

 

Unfavourable DLA only

 

C50 Conditions not satisfied

C51 Medical conditions not satisfied prior to age 65

C52 Prospective test not satisfied

C53 Failure to establish conditions satisfied

C54 Child – conditions not satisfied

C55 Qualifying period not satisfied

C70 Not considered

C71 Not decided – TSMC interim

C72 Not considered – for renewal

 

Favourable Indefinite award AA only

 

C20 Low Day attention

C21 Low Day supervision

C22 Low Night attention

C24 Low Renal dialysis

C27 Low Night watching over

C30 High Night attention/Day attention

C31 High Night attention/Day supervision

C32 High Night watching over/Day attention

C34 High Night watching over/Day supervision

C37 High Award under Special Rules

 

Favourable Fixed award AA only

 

C80 Low Day attention

C81 Low Day supervision

C82 Low Night attention

C84 Low Renal dialysis

C87 Low Night watching over

C90 High Night attention/Day attention

C91 High Night attention/Day supervision

C92 High Night watching over/Day attention

C94 High Night watching over/Day supervision

 

Unfavourable AA only

 

C50 Conditions not satisfied

C53 Failure to establish conditions not satisfied

C55 Qualifying period not satisfied

C56 Conversion case disallowed

 

Mobility reason codes

 

Favourable Indefinite award DLA only

 

M01 Low Limited mobility needs

M30 High Virtually unable to walk

M31 High Double amputee

M32 High Deaf and blind

M33 High SMC (S of S certificate)

M34 High Mentally handicapped

M36 High Serious deterioration

M37 High Unable to walk

 

Favourable Fixed award DLA only

 

M41 Low Limited mobility needs

M90 High Virtually unable to walk

M91 High Double amputee

M92 High Deaf and blind

M94 High Severe mental impairment

M96 High Serious deterioration

M97 High Unable to walk

 

Unfavourable DLA only

 

M50 Conditions not satisfied

M51 Disability conditions not satisfied prior to age 65

M52 Prospective test not satisfied

M53 Failure to establish conditions

M54 Child – conditions not satisfied

M55 Qualifying period not satisfied

M56 Unable to benefit

M57 Child – HR conditions not satisfied

M60 Not decided – Special Rules interim

M61 Not considered – under age (for periods up to and including 08/04/01

M62 Not considered – under age (for periods starting on or after 09/04/01)

M70 Not considered

M72 Not considered – for renewal

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK nerves at an all time high now, stress is giving me a headache as we have 24 hours til the appeal.

 

We got the outline letter fron Welfare benefits today and he has asked the tribunal to consider Middle care and LOWER mobility, and Im seething, as our son was on HIGHER before.

 

So looks like we will lose the car on Thursday as the benefits officer has got it wrong. :mad:

 

I cant get hold of the WBO as it is a local holiday here in Aberdeen and he is off!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wishing you the best of luck for tomorrow,

Paul.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul

 

I hoping he has put down the lower as a typo, and that when they see our son tomorrow they will put the award back as it should have been, our son is currently in the middle of a major flare up with weeping open sores on his legs, arms and torso, and it looks like an infection is setting in as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We got the outline letter fron Welfare benefits today and he has asked the tribunal to consider Middle care and LOWER mobility, and Im seething, as our son was on HIGHER before.

 

Just because that is what the WBO recommends does not mean that is what you will get.

 

It is down to you and your evidence plus they are more likely to consirer what you doctors etc say.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I know Im probably nitpicking but the nerves and stress are really hitting home just now.

 

roll on this time tomorrow and hopefully it will be all over and done with

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations. ;)

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pleased to hear of your success. Well done you for your tenacity after all that they have put you through. Perhaps when your jubilation wears off you'll be able to get a decent and well deserved nights sleep, the first for some time I would imagine!

Best regards,

Paul.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh fantastic I am really pleased for you both i await to hear how it went but rest up first WELL DONE U

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that is good perhaps you could ask the MP if he would like to hear other similar stories and if he does let us know

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...