Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repayment on repossession


graisbeck
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Back in the early 90's my ex-wife and I had our home repossessed as I had previously lost my job. We did speak to the lender at the time but to no avail and the repossession went ahead.

 

In 2007 a solicitor/collection agency contacted me asking me to complete a incoming/outgoings form and to make an offer of repayment on a monthly basis. I agreed to this and have continued to pay £40 a month. They have now sent me another incoming/outgoings form and are expecting me to offer a substanial increase in my monthly payments.

 

Are there any laws, guidelines etc which would protect me from this agency demanding an unreasonable amount of money for repayment of the repossession.

 

Thanks for any assistance in this matter.

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, was the house repossessed before 1995? If so, then when the solicitors contacted you in 2007 the debt would be over 12 years old and therefore statute barred. Even if you start to pay the debt after the 12 years it cannot be "un-statute barred" (no matter what they try to tell you!!).

 

If you can give more detail on dates etc we can advise further. Who are the solicitors collecting this money?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn, thanks for your reply.

 

The solicitors are;

 

HL Solicitors

Spring Gardens,

Manchester

 

I've checked the dates and they are as follows;

 

Repossession date - 06/09/95

I first replied to their correspondance on - 12/04/07

Edited by graisbeck

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date was the last payment on the mortgage ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date was the last payment on the mortgage ?

 

Sorry I can't remember when that was. I suppose it would of been at least 3 month before the repossession date.

 

Could you possibly suggest the best way to find out?

Edited by graisbeck
Added question

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send the original creditor (the mortgage company) a Subject Access Request - it will cost you £10 but will give all the information on the account you had with them, including the payment details and property sale info. If the last payment was made before April 1995 then I suspect the debt is stature barred, but we will know more when you receive their reply to the SAR.

 

Send the £10 by postal order and ensure the letter is sent by recorded delivery (keep a copy of the letter and check on the royalmail website a few days later to print off the signature receipt, keep that safe with your copy of the letter. You will find the SAR letter in the templates library, you will need to adapt it to read mortgage information instead of bank charges info, so make sure you delete references to bank charges. You are still asking for all the information they hold on you.

 

You should also send a copy of the SAR to the solicitors with a covering letter letting along the lines of "Please see affixed letter sent to (name of lender) regarding the above account. We will contact you again on receipt of the information we have requested."

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hi Ell-enn, thanks for your reply.

 

The solicitors are;

 

HL Solicitors

Spring Gardens,

Manchester

 

I've checked the dates and they are as follows;

 

Repossession date - 06/09/95

I first replied to their correspondance on - 12/04/07

 

ok got it

 

repo 06/09/95

last payment three months previouse 06/06/95

add 12 years 06/06./2007

 

well and truly statute barred

 

ill dig out a template for you to send the solicitors

 

its over

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter sent when debt is statute barred (send recorded)

 

1 High Street,

Newtown,

Kent

R21 4RH

June 28, 2006

 

The Loan Company

Company House,

Church Street,

Newtown,

Kent,

R1 7HG

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of twelve years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over twelve years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to CPUTR2008

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on - the OP has been paying £40 per month since 2007 - if he started to pay before 06/06/07 then he has admitted the debt before it became statute barred.

 

Graisbeck - what date in 2007 did you make the first payment of £40.00 ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Provided you didn't make any written offer of payment after June 1994 then the account would be statute barred in June 2006.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my last post I've looked through the paperwork again, and there seems to be a mention of a court order(???) and payments made to it but I can't remember any of it.

What would happen if I went ahead and informed them that the debt was expired but they replied saying the dates I supplied were incorrect? would they ask for the payment in full? Also, can I claim back the amounts that I've already paid to HL for the last few year?

 

What do I do next, do I send the above template?

 

Thanks for your assistance in this matter.

Edited by graisbeck

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if the account comes back as NOT statute barred, the company cannot make you pay back more than you can afford.

I recently filled out an income/expenditure form for a company after me and could honestly only afford to pay £40 a month. The company refused this amount saying it would take XX years to pay off. They then sent a debt management agency out and they went through the income/expenditure form too and all I could REASONABLY afford to pay was £4 a month. The company accepted this! As the court would see it as I have offered to pay something, so it's pointless trying to get money from me that I simply do not have (not sure of the relevant law there, maybe something to do with human rights??)

 

Unless your earnings have increased significantly, fill the form out and put in a figure which you can reasonably afford (may be less than £40 a month!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fill out this budget sheet as it is more realistic and is the one used by Nationaldebtline. If you fill it in on the screen it automatically calculates for you.

Budget Sheet.xls

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. You have nothing to lose by sending the Stature Barred letter first, it is then up to them to prove it is not SB. Send it by recorded delivery and keep a copy of the letter together with the receipt for the recorded delivery so you can print the signature receipt off the royalmail website - the keep in a safe place in case you need to prove they received it.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...