Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EGG - defective Default Notice?


BlueBox
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Could do with some confirmation of regulations on Default Notices please.

 

As far as I can establish, a DN can only be sent if two payments have been missed (or possibly when the arrears are in excess of that amount).

 

I wrote to Egg (with I & E) in November 2008 advising them that I would be unable to make full payments for the forseeable future and offering them pro rata reduced payments with other creditors.

 

I made a full payment in October and then a reduced November payment. The default notice is dated 19 December, 10 days before the next payment was due.

 

All the other details of the DN appear to be in order. The arrears amount is correct, the dates are OK (dated 19 December, remedy by 16 January).

 

The January online statememt shows a 'Notice of Arrears' but the default notice had already been served. The date on the Arrears Notice is 29 December even though it couldn't be deemed available until the statement date (15 Jan). This means the DN was served before the AN anyway!

 

Although they had my valid email address, I received no email notification alerting me to the arrears notice. They did manage to send me a revised T&Cs notice on 30 October, so that was obviously important enough!

 

The account was terminated in writing on 19 January 09 and a default was filed on 21 January with CRAs. I have printouts of last 12 months of online statements with the various messages.

 

Collection (not the debt) was passed to Moorcroft, who gave up after I questioned the original CCA (approved/individual limit wording) and is now with Capquest/HL Legal.

 

In addition, I understand from the 2006 CCA that a fresh default notice has to be served every 6 months - this has not happened (now month 9/10).

 

This all seems wrong on so many counts that I really need some help to know which way to tackle things. My main objective is to get default removed and have account shown as settled. If the process described above is defective, I am prepared to take legal action to resolve the matter.

 

Thanks

Edited by BlueBox
extra info added
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure that it's a default notice that needs to be issued every six months.

 

The 2006 act explanatory notes can be found here...

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006/en/ukpgaen_20060014_en.pdf

 

If you scroll down to Page 10 of the document you will see a paragraph that says this

 

Thereafter the creditor or owner will be required to give to the debtor or hirer a notice of sums in arrears at intervals of six months until he ceases to be in arrears and has paid all sums of interest or default sums that are payable in relation to his arrears, or a judgment is made in relation to the sums payable under that agreement.

 

That is possibly what you may have been referring to, a notice of sums in arrears does not mean a seperate default notice every 6 months but simply a form of a statement showing the arrears etc.

 

That is my interpreation anyway.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that - double red herring as in fact the relevant section refers to fixed-sum agreements, not running credit accounts. Sorry for any confusion.

 

Can anyone confirm that an Arrears Notice MUST be provided (complete with OFT sheet) BEFORE a Default Notice? Of course, the online Egg arrears notice could not have included the OFT sheet anyway.

 

Any thoughts on validity of DN if only one payment has been missed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read through the CCA s86-89 again and it seems that the requirement to provide an Arrears Notice is completely separate from the timing of a Default Notice. As fas as I can tell, a default notice can be served after one missed/reduced payment with the arrears notice following after the second payment was missed (which is exactly what Egg have done).

 

Still doesn't change the fact the arrears notice doesn't include the info sheet and the original agreement is cack anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...