Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Company Sick Pay withheld


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently had to take 2 days off work due to a bad cold and sore throat. I called in sick on both days as required and when I returned my teamleader went through the 'Welcome Back' form with me. The last section for 'Payment for sick leave' had already been completed by our manager with the reason 'Pay not approved, had to pay overtime to other staff'.

 

Without immediate access to my contract I'm thinking this is wrong, that it is down to the company to pay staff and not for it to be taken from me for being ill.

 

Can anyone say if this is illegal off the bat before I get home to dig out my contract and argue the case with Human Resources?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must check your contract as there may be a section on company sick pay that will tell you what you can expect, if there is and you are entitiled to it then the company are in breach of contract by withholding it. I'm sure others will be along to further assist you.

 

Regards

Regards

 

LilyLou

 

 

 

 

 

If I have been helpful please tip my scales

 

Any advice/comments I give are based solely on personal experience, if in doubt please consult an expert.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Big Nick

 

It is purely a contractual matter - you need to check the wording of your company sick pay scheme.

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found my contract which says what I thought, I am entitled to Company Sick Pay 'at the managers discretion'. Nothing about taking it to pay someone else overtime. Had a chat with HR about what happened and am having a talk this week with another manager regarding sick leave as this is my 4th occasion in the last 12 months (standard practice, apparently).

 

If that goes nowhere I am getting copies of that WB form and the company sick policy and filing a grievance. Certainly don't think management should withhold my sickpay without talking to me or having read the forms first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had official meeting with manager and HR rep who took notes, the official reason for this meeting was that this was the 4th time I've been off in the last year.

This is silly season at work, managers appear to have very little to do and this time of year is when most people start hitting their 3+ sickness absences. I counted 5 other people being investigated or disciplined this last month.

Went thru reasons for each absence as they didn't have the previous forms to hand, wonder why we bother filling them in?

 

Decision was made to award me the sick pay as the manager now believes I wasn't trying it on. Nice to know how much they care about me after all these years working there before they did.

Funny thing was the manager telling me I should have gone to them first about this and not HR, deeply suspect it would have led nowhere and that the pre-signed form should not have been done in that way. It was confirmed that the overtime budget is separate to sick pay (surprise!) and that there is no budget for SP which makes little sense as what really happens is your regular salary gets withheld.

 

Tired of working there, looking out for new job but recession not helping.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same thing happened to my partner she was off sick and on the second day off she was not given company pay, she looked her contract which said refer to staff hand book which she downloaded from the web and it says:

 

"A comprehensive sick pay scheme for absence and will normally make this payment. However, you should be aware these payments are discretionary and as such the Company retains the right not to pay Company sick pay in certain circumstances.

 

Deliberate non-cooperation may result in the Company exercising its discretion not to pay Company sick pay.

 

Company sick pay is the difference between Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) and your normal salary. An employee’s eligibility depends on their

length of service.

ALL EMPLOYEES

Service Eligibility (weeks)

Under 3 months 0 weeks

3 – 12 months Up to 4 weeks

1 – 3 years Up to 8 weeks

3 – 5 years Up to 12 weeks

Over 5 years 12 weeks + 1 week for each full year of service up to a maximum of 26 weeks

Sick pay year

The sick pay year for the Company scheme runs from 1st April to 31st March. Eligibility for sick pay cannot be carried over from one sick pay

year to the next.

 

Her employer now says that as she was within 13 weeks of her first day of absence which was w/e 4th June this defaults her automatically to C2 which is SSP at a daily rate of 15.19 per day. My partners other day off with was 20th July that falls within 13 week period. My partners cannot make sense of this whatsoever. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...