Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5316 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I declared myself bankrupt on the 29th September 2009, and have the interview with the OR on the 6th October 2009, I've been looking through different threads and had some of my fears put at ease by them but I have one worry that seems not to have been covered. I'm on Income Support and in receipt of Child Benefit, Child Tax Credits, Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, and am also receiving CSA. Some threads state that the benefits meant for my daughter (CTC, CB and CSA) will be taken into account. I thought these wouldnt be included as they are designed to support my child. Income Support is stated as the minimum a person can live on, so I'm worried that they'll take money that I cant afford to be without. We get by ok on the money as it stands but I dont think we'd manage on less. I had a look at the typical expenditure and i dont want to come across as making excess on my outgoings to the OR, because I do spend the money. I have prepayment meters for gas and elec so no proof of how much I put in, I pay TV licence and water rates, and I have 1 luxury which is my broadband. Any ideas on what to expect and if I'll have to live on beans until my BR is discharged?

 

Thanks in advance redface.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The OR will take a realistic household income and expenditure from you. The benefits that you are receiving will probably be cancelled out by any expenses for your children including housekeeping. If you need a certain expense within your budget, as long as it can be justified it should be fine to include these. You should not need to worry about living off beans and toast, as nice as it is xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

iof your incoem is made solely from benefit then no IPA should be done unless you deciued to make voluntary payment. However if you work they do take account chidl tax credit and so on when calculating surplus available.

 

here we go an extract form the technical manual

An IPA should not be sought where the bankrupt's only source of income is state benefit. In the context of this chapter "state benefits” refers to all forms of income supplement and support provided by central or local government including, but not limited to: income support, job seekers allowance, disability living allowances, incapacity benefit, council tax benefit, housing benefit, state retirement benefit, child benefit and all forms of tax credit (child, working and pension).

The official receiver should not automatically discount the possibility of obtaining a contribution from a bankrupt who is in receipt of benefit. The person making the income and expenditure calculation (usually the examiner) should initially ascertain whether the bankrupt is also in receipt of non-benefit income. If this is the case, an IPA should be considered, the total income should be established (see other income sources at paragraph 31.7.7) including state benefits and the bankrupt's reasonable expenses deducted (see paragraph 31.7.19) to cover his/her reasonable domestic needs. An assessment can then be made as to whether the bankrupt has a surplus real disposable income. If an IPA is to be sought, the amount any payment should be less than the income from the source other than benefits. Examples of calculations can be found at Annex A. It should be remembered that whilst the bankrupt's total income (including state benefits) should be included in the calculation of surplus income, it is the income from sources other than the benefit(s) which is providing the payments under the IPA/IPO, which is why an IPA should only be sought from non benefit income.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pink

 

With income support claims everyone has a calculation based on individual circumstances, this is called the applicable amount.

 

Income support is a means tested benefit - this basically means other income such as tax credits & maintenance are counted against the amount of income support you are allowed (your applicable amount).

 

In other words if your applicable amount for income support is £200 and you have tax credits of £45 and say £40 maintenance you would receive £115 income support (figure not including disregards).

 

Putting it in a more simple form is - if you were not receiving maintenance payments you would be receiving a higher amount of income support.

 

If you qualify for any amount of income support based on the above you are technically receiving the amount the law says you need to live on and therefore as far as I can see there should be no question of an IPA / IPO.

 

Based on what you have told us you should be fine

 

Hope you can make sense of this and try not to worry.

 

Best Wishes

Edited by Wintry
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Princess

I'm in the same situation as you and became bankrupt in August. The OR was brilliant. I have no payment plan in place. I start a new job in a few weeks so will be letting the OR know but I don't think i'll have any excess income when i start working. I still have my broadband, mobile phone etc. Don't worry, it's not bad at all when you have your meeting. I felt overwhelming relief when i walked out of the office. I had made myself ill worrying for 2 weeks before it.

If you need to ask me anything, feel free. I'll do what I can to advise x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Princess

I'm in the same situation as you and became bankrupt in August. The OR was brilliant. I have no payment plan in place. I start a new job in a few weeks so will be letting the OR know but I don't think i'll have any excess income when i start working. I still have my broadband, mobile phone etc. Don't worry, it's not bad at all when you have your meeting. I felt overwhelming relief when i walked out of the office. I had made myself ill worrying for 2 weeks before it.

If you need to ask me anything, feel free. I'll do what I can to advise x

 

you may start a new job but you will have an increase and new expenses to add into you statement of affairs . so there is thing you can stil ltake into accoutn suc as launch, travel expenses, clothes , hairdresser etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Princess

I'm in the same situation as you and became bankrupt in August. The OR was brilliant. I have no payment plan in place. I start a new job in a few weeks so will be letting the OR know but I don't think i'll have any excess income when i start working. I still have my broadband, mobile phone etc. Don't worry, it's not bad at all when you have your meeting. I felt overwhelming relief when i walked out of the office. I had made myself ill worrying for 2 weeks before it.

If you need to ask me anything, feel free. I'll do what I can to advise x

 

you had to go to the office????

Link to post
Share on other sites

some people have an office interview, about 20%. These are usually people who have had a creditor make them bankrupt or who have been trading, the rest have a telephone interview and a few where the case is very simple and the petition is informative dont have an interview at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...