Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Oakwood Homeloans posession order...


Gray1509
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I need some urgent info regarding my problem...

 

We've got a mortgage out with Oakwood and they have started posession proceedings against us.

I've had my own company for a number of years, but in Oct last year my work dried up. This year I've had to let the IR force a liquidation on it as I've had no work at all and I needed help. At the start of this year I contacted Oakwood and we agreed that we would pay only a 1/3 of the normal payments. We've kept up these payments all year even though I'm still out of work. We've also been in constant contact with them. In August I contacted them as usual to pay the monthly payment and also asked about reposession as we were getting a bit worried regarding this as the letters they kept sending out showed that we were nearly £11k behind now.

We've now been served with the posession order and we wanted to try and sort something out. The thing that really gets us is the fact that our mortgage deal runs out in Feb and we'd end up paying around exactly what we are doing at the moment... We also had a letter from them in Nov last year offering us a deal, where if we were to move the mortgage they would offer us a discount where they'd knock nearly £30k off the price of the mortgage owed and also not charge us for leaving the deal (nearly another £10k)...

 

Is there any help on offer out there regarding this at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they already got a suspended order for possession on your home? From my experience with just getting over the same type of thing you will need to go in front of a judge first for them to actually get the possession order.

Ell will no doubt reply to you and she is amazing :) and will no doubt be able to offer heaps of help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they haven't we have to go to court for the first time on 30th Oct...At the moment we're trying to get them to agree to us going on the HMS scheme, so that we can continue to pay at the current rate until our deal runs out...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just clarify - you are on a high rate which was fixed - but soon your payment will reduce to an amount that you can afford?

 

Do you have anything else in the pipeline that will change either your income or expenditure?

 

Are you being charged any arrears fees?

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the knowledge to provide a comprehensive answer to your issues but a good starting point would be to take a look at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/repossessions/192983-liability-bills-after-mortgage.html> . the thread is entitled Liability for bills after Mortgage lender directly appointed receiver. Although the thread topic is on a different subject post 3 and 9 may be of help regarding the packaging/securitization of mortages and obtaining information to aid determining if the account has been securitized. Sending a Subject Access Request (SAR) by recorded delivery may also be of help. Post 9 offers a form of words on what to include with the Subject Access Request (SAR) which you should amend to suit your circumstances.

 

I have sent a private message (pm) to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

We've had another letter from Wragg&co (solicitors) today. Giving us the witness statements. Also telling us its not too late to stop the repossession and to contact oakwood to give them a proposal.

The letter is a complete piece of c**p!!!

"Please complete the attached income and expenditure form" - What form, there isn't one attached...

On the witness statement the figure we borrowed is correct, but the outstanding balance is completely wrong its actually £85k less that the mortgage (we're on an interest only mortgage, so it should be the same as the figure we borrowed). The monthly installment is completely wrong as well. Again its about half of what our current monthly payments should be...

Then there's the arrears, well this is also incorrect by the tune of several thousand pounds...

In the last point of the statement it points out that we haven't provided them with the reasons for the arrears or of our financial circumstances (This really made my blood boil as we've told them from day one what the situation is and how much is coming into the household). It then goes on to say that telephone contact has been made with debt councillor engaged (the bloke turned up at the house, went through a couple of things with me and just said there isn't much I can do with you being out of work, then left). We've maintained contact with Oakwood all year, once or twice a month to be precise and we have all the times we called logged on our phone bills...

A copy of the mortgage deed has been enclosed, its a copy of a copy. Oakwood don't even own the deed, it's owned by a company called 'Money Partners'

 

I'm sorry for the long winded-ness of the post, but is there anything that we can take into court from all this to help us out at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the copy of the copy from Money Partners, as they are the actual owners of the mortgage, and Oakwood are an administration company. As all the figures are wrong you need to write it down in this manner

 

Fig no 1 - agree or disagree - give reasons why you disagree....

Fig no 2 - etc etc etc

 

and that will be a start of the defence - I assume you have entered a defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Yes, the copy of the copy from Money Partners, as they are the actual owners of the mortgage, and Oakwood are an administration company. As all the figures are wrong you need to write it down in this manner

 

Fig no 1 - agree or disagree - give reasons why you disagree....

Fig no 2 - etc etc etc

 

and that will be a start of the defence - I assume you have entered a defence?

 

If Money Partners are the actual owners of the deed, shouldn't it actually be them doing the reposession and not Oakwood? Or at least there should be some sort of information to state that Oakwood are acting on behalf of Money Partners... Also a copy of a copy does not prove that Oakwood or Money Partners actually have the original document. Don't they have to prove this in court?

 

Unfortunately in the court documents I haven't been able to enter a defence as you have stated due to the fact that the witness statement arrived well after the court documents were received and sent back. They also didn't have any figures within the original court documents...

 

We have got our court appointment tomorrow afternoon, so if anyone can give us any information as what to do now it would be much appriecated...

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

gray1509

hello have come from another thread as someone has a similar problem was wondering how you got on with your court appointment?If it went badly nowhere near the end of the road yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...