Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what the latest data on school suspensions tells us about the UK education system and early intervention.View the full article
    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

welcome finance - account in dispute - or is it?


electric2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I put my account in dispute in September, and today received my cca. Please could someone take a look and tell me if it is ok? Also Welcome have said that where the cca 1974 states you can put your account into dispute - this only applies to Banking Institutions.

Thanks

 

Electrik

 

just trying to work out how to photobucket them on here,

 

btn_geturs.gifbtn_viewall.gif
Edited by electric2
attaching docs
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

It would appear that the reality there is little you can do, the recent court case reported on this forum would tend to strengthen this view Im afraid. Going down the 'in dispute' route will no doubt priove your agreement is unenforceable BUT you will almost certainly have negative info. recorded on your CR, there have been a few cases where this has been removed, but quite rare.

 

Andy

 

Hi

Had a letter today - welcome say as a gesture of good will they will remove all the negative info from my credit files :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Had a letter today - welcome say as a gesture of good will they will remove all the negative info from my credit files :smile:

 

Until they update the system! and then it might revert back to what it previously said!...keep yur eye on it.:wink:..this happened to others caggers...its on the main thread ( around the summer somewhere?)

 

b-o-2

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I think I am going to vt my agreement. I have paid three quarters of the agreement, can I just write a letter saying i am going to vt and pay nothing? When I mentioned it to welcome they said I need to pay a VT fee that they would work out for me?

Thanks

Electric

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have just found the sec 100 of cca that relates to voluntary termination. Please can someone put it in laymans terms for me? It states:

 

(1) Where a regulated hp or cs agreement is terminated under sec 99 the debtor shall be liable, unless the agreement provides for a smaller payment, or does not provide for any payment, to pay to the creditor the amount (if any) by which one-half of the total price exceeds the aggregate of the sums paid and the sums due in respect of the total price immediately before the termination.

 

Section 99 basically states that at any time before the final payment by the debtor under a hp agreement falls due, the debtor shall be entitled to terminate the agreement by giving notice to any person entitled to receive the sums payable.

 

I stopped paying welcome in August, I have paid 3/4 of the agreement. I want to terminate the agreement now, do I have to pay a termination fee? Do I have to pay the payments i have not paid for Aug, Sep and Oct?

 

Please help asap - got them ringing me 4 times a day again

 

thanks

electrik

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just found this on the National Debt line whichmight help you:

 

Some creditors try to charge you for collecting the goods after the agreement has been terminated. It appears that this is not allowed under the Consumer Credit Act. If asked to pay an additional charge, you can complain to your trading standards department.

 

As long you have paid over a half (including arrears) you have to put it writing. They will probably want to inspect the car and will charge you for any damage which is not normal wear and tear.

 

You will have a section on your agreement 'Termination - your rights' which will tell you what amount you have to pay before you can terminate without paying anymore.

 

If Welcome want to charge you a VT fee ask them to put it in writing and ask them were it is stated on your agreement. They may also ask you to deliver to a depot miles away from you (this happened to me when I VT a car a few years ago). You can deliver the car back in an acceptable distance from your address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Just Jue

Thanks for that it is very helpful. Welcome sent me a letter with an amount I had to pay before I handed the car back. I have paid 3/4 of my agreement, and know now that I can hand the car back and not pay anything else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Not necessarily true Andy. What the judgement said in essence was, where a debt EXISTS, but is unenforcable, then the adverse data may be recorded.

 

No mention was made of other instances where there may actually not be a debt at all. For instance, if a debt were to be declared void, and a judge declares so, then technically, there never was a debt to report on.

 

Mention was made regarding the fact that the judge was asked to rule on similar situations, but the consensus was, he could not rule on hypothetical cases, and could only address the facts before him.

 

Quite right too.

 

Sorry that this is a relatively old thread ... I have just looked at my credit report on Experian, via Credit Expert, and about 5 or 6 creditors have recorded continual missed payments over a whole year, whilst the accounts have been "in dispute". 11 months ago, I transferred from a traditional debt management co to a "debt reduction" co, and at the outset they said my credit reference data wouldn't have been affected, but it seems to have got worse now. I also have 4 defaults on the system, which presumably nothing can be done about during the 6 years from the date of default.

 

However, with the one that have recorded, say, 6 missed payments over several months, is it worth saying that as the account is in dispute, usually through no executed fully-signed agreement could I issue a NOC (notice of correction) to Experian to say that they shouldn't be recording my non-payment as "missed" payments?

 

Thanks for any advice on this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

''electric2''-I see that you was trying to claim back Mechanical Breakdown Insurance & Shortfal Extra Insurance from Welcome F.I have been mis-sold this insurances too and i would like to ask you did you won anything back from them and if yes could you please give me some advise what i should do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i have exactly the same, and when later on when i try to cancel it they told me that it is not possible. Have you complained about it to them and if yes did you reclaim something back? Please give me some advise what to do to get my money back. ( 1400 pounds they charge me for this insurances :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

hi all,

 

i have had the same problem with welcome finance. took out a car on finance which cost £5000 with all the PPI, Breakdown, shortfall insurances it comes out to £12,000. When i paid the allotted amount to VT. they told me that i was in arrears. I paid the arrears of £900.00 and still they will not take back the car. I wrote and wrote to no avail.

 

Todate i received a letter regarding PPI reclaim, filled out the forms sent it off. and awaiting their response. I am at my wits end with welcome as they registered a default of £8000. How is that possible? where did all my payments go? need some advise. please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would guess that you have had a huge interest

rate lots of charges and very high PPI premiums,

and high premiums on the other insurances and

interest charge on the as well.

Personally I would send Welcome SAR to get all the data

held on the account, this costs £10.00 which is a statutory fee,

they have 40 days to reply there is a template letter in the CAG

library.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...