Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • While I am waiting for the original solicitor to ring back about the will can I ask. After my dad passed they were informed about this an released a copy of the will to me and my brother, should they have set the trust up then as they were informed of his passing?   Thanks again
    • .. A tired little trump simply run out of wind ..  for a little while ...
    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fzrkitten sort of VS HFC Bank


fzrkitten
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4957 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Scooby_Doo2,

 

I took the first agreement out on 15.8.98. This was for the amount on the statement. I haven't had SAR stuff yet as they wanted copies of driving licence etc, and I'd seen not to send these, so I haven't done anything yet.

 

I have the original agreement for this loan. I also have the court judgement, but not at hand right at this second, and a solicitors letter after judgement asking for a higher amount written in August 2005. I think this is at least 2 or 3 years after the judgement, and I am still paying £50 a month from my wages now.

 

I don't recall whether I upped the original loan, or if they have just done me over royally. It did have ppi added.

 

I have had no contact from the solicitors since 2005, but this is still an attachment of earnings on my wages. I wondered if I can challenge this, and who with?

 

Many thanks,

Fzrkitten.

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

what was the judgement total? and did it mention interest?

seems like they have been leeching off you for far too long.

 

and i hope you didn't agree to a higher payment!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've never paid more, I didn't answer the solicitors and they didn't write again, but it's still now £50 a month out of my wages, and isn't set to stop for a long time still. I've got an email at work with more detail, I'm not even sure I know how much judgement was for, can I find that out still from the court?

 

Fzrkitten.

x

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep all you have to do is phone the court.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

I've just found the original attachment of earnings judgement. It's a lot. It was back in 2003 and I've been paying £50 a month since then, and I'd still say it would take another 6/7/8 years to pay it off. I don't know how much my original loan ended up being for, that's the problem. I'm sure it was nowhere near this amount, and they also had ppi insurance on it.

 

Any idea where to go from here? I haven't got the SAR details yet, HFC wanted a copy of my driving licence etc as ID, I understand I shouldn't do that?

 

Can I go direct to the court, or am I risking ending up paying more do you think?

 

Fzrkitten.

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

no not yet.......

 

so the ATEO was £50pcm, what was the judgement figure [total] and was interest mentioned or anything else on the judgement regarding the total to pay.

 

i'd sum up your payments and lets see where you are now [totalwise].

also, you must still be paying the named creditor?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I only have the ATEO, total is 11604.09 :shock:

 

It mentions nothing about interest, and the claimant is HFC Bank PLC.

 

So I take it I'm still paying the original people.

 

Fzrk...

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i make that roughly 5250 you have paid to date?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus I guess what I'd been paying off of the loan before judgement anyway? Not that it had come down much. You can see from the statement I posted how much interest was added every month.

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

right well i think you next step is to try and prise the SAR info out of HFC

 

as for this signature thing.

 

if you see pete 2002_2004's thread

you will see the judge has ordered HFC to comply with his CCA/SAR requests, having refused several times not to comply because of the signature rubbish.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi Dx,

 

Sorry it's been a few months, I was awaiting the SAR request stuff, which I have actually got, and trying to get my head round losing mum, so I'm back now, and hopefully uploading the info you wanted, sorry it's taken so long.

 

I've found the SAR stuff very interesting, it looks like I actually had judgement made for over 4 grand more than I actually owed, thanks to nice solicitors and stuff on their behalf! The PPI was cancelled at some stage and I think I am well outside the 5 years for claiming it, but I don't see why I should still be paying this off, or at least as much of it, if they added that much on. Especially with all their charges etc. So I will look through the paperwork properly, having said that I know not what I am doing, so could use some help if anyone thinks I can challenge the original judgement. (I have the Attachment of earnings judgement, and all the SAR stuff now).

 

http://i873.photobucket.com/albums/ab293/fzrkitten/Bank%20Stuff/scan0001-1.jpg

 

http://i873.photobucket.com/albums/ab293/fzrkitten/backpage.jpg

 

I'm hoping these links take you to the files, these were the original loan files back in 1999, I then obviously upped my loan, but now have all the paperwork and to me it doesn't add up.

 

Best Regards,

 

Fzrkitten

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The ATEO has no interest details on it at all, I do not have any other paperwork from the court.

I have got all SAR info from HFC.

Can anyone advise if I should challenge the original judgement, it seems the debt was handed over at £4000 less than judgement was made against me, and I have been paying for 7 years. Surely I should be let off now for good behaviour?! lol.

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...