Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA sent someone elses CCA(!) and now harrashing me


seanj70
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

after weekes of waiting MBNA finally sent thru what they called a true copy of my CCA

 

there was one set of docs with my address on but no signature, however another set of 'CCA' docs with someone else's name and address! surely that's breach of Data Protection??

 

anyway - i've sent the usual template letter back saying they didn't supply a true copy etc... and havent yet heard regarding that.

 

...but they are calling every day saying i'm in arrears and need payment and they've written and emailed threatening passing to a collection agency despite my written request not to call me in my last letter.

 

i now want to write to them (again) clarifying that we're in dispute and i want to report to the OFT and ICO (re: data protection) are there any templates for this?

 

how do i take this further? should i get one of these debt litigation companies involved?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Id never recommend someone use those debt litigation companies, you can do it all yourself.

 

Did you send this letter:

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

 

To stop them calling try this letter:

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/52-harassment/135--harassment-by-telephone-response-letter-

 

If you can log onto your MBNA account online change your contact numbers on there ;)

 

If youve already sent the in disute letter I dont think you need to tell them again. Just go ahead and make a complaint to the ICO/OFT.

 

There's been a lot of discussion regarding the best method to flush out the original CCA, as it seems creditors think they can get away with supplying pretty much any garbage following a CCA request. Try requesting the original agreement that bears your signature with a SAR.

 

Itd be useful if you could scan in what they have sent you (make sure to hide your personal info!) so you can be sure whether or not they have complied.

 

Itd also be useful to know the date you made the original CCA request, the date they responded and how many months in arrears you are.

I have no legal qualifications whatsoever, so please check any input I have for accuracy. And please correct me if you disagree!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs Sean

 

Can you give the date you made the original CCA request, the date you recieved the CA and when did you took out this account?

 

What theyve sent you so far is exactly the same as what they sent me: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/204693-haggis-mbna-enforceable-agreement.html

 

Ive been told that although it wouldnt be enforceable in court it does satisfy a s78 request. As gezwee says though, whos to say the only 'agreement' they sent you wasnt the one in someone elses name?

 

If they have a signed agreement the SAR will flush it out. Make sure to send it recorded!

I have no legal qualifications whatsoever, so please check any input I have for accuracy. And please correct me if you disagree!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No!!!!! Just wrote you a massive reply then accidently deleted :mad:

 

Take 2:

 

Try a letter of complaint on the grounds that they were not entitled to enforce the agreement between 23/06 and 27/08, and as such should not have added charges/interest during this period.

 

Consequently:

 

The balance of the account is unlawfully inflated;

And sharing this innacurate balance with credit reference agencies is a breach of the Data Protection Act.

 

Then you can put a complaint into the Information Commisioners Office, and the Financial Ombudmans Service. I did this a couple of months back and am still waiting on replies from them.

 

(Im not 100% sure on this though as some have said that they believe Credit Agreements can be enforced retrospectively after a failure to satisfy a CA request)

I have no legal qualifications whatsoever, so please check any input I have for accuracy. And please correct me if you disagree!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok - update!

 

i sent a SAR to which they requested proof of ID so i sent driving license scan and have had nothing further on this. their 40 days were up on 7th November.

 

They have sent several letters however saying they what they supplied (the documents above) under my CCA request are acceptable and therefore they are quite within their rights to collect on the account!

apparently they don't have to supply a signed agreement to fulfil a CCA request.

 

i'm now about to send a letter saying 'i'm admitting no debt nor paying a thing until you supply a signed credit agreement' but does any one have any advice before i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi if this so called agreement is for an account opened in 2004 I would be asking them how the agreement can contain charges limited to £12 which they introduced in June 2006 charges prior to this date were from £20 to £25 at least..

 

As normal a load of manure from MBNA.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice find dpick! you must be bored reading thru all that on a sunday!!

 

anyway - here's what I intend sending them...

 

-----------------

 

Dear Sirs

 

Account number: xxx

 

Account In Dispute

 

On 23rd June 2009 I made a formal request for information under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 s78. This request was made in writing and was delivered via recorded delivery to your offices on 24th June 2009.

 

 

The documents that you provided me included a credit agreement in another person's name and address.

On 27th September 2009 I made a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act in an attempt to acquire a true copy of any credit agreement that may or may not have been signed by me on the opening of this account. This request was made in writing and was delivered via recorded delivery to your offices on 29th September 2009.

 

 

You had until 7th November 2009 to fulfil your obligation under the Data Protection Act and to date I have received nothing in response to my request.

I have now reported your actions to the Information Commissioner's Office and the Financial Ombudsmen Service and I have written to the third party who's credit agreement I was supplied.

 

 

Until you can provide me with a legible copy of a credit agreement that carries my name and address, and bears my signature, I do not accept liability for the alleged debt and I will be making no payments to the account.

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice find dpick! you must be bored reading thru all that on a sunday!!

 

Nah I just HATE MBNA that much and of course I now know the tricks that these MBNA clowns get up to. They would say that a piece of blank paper is an enforceable agreement (you know we are a big American bank and we are the law.)

 

I would not go into to much detail with regard to why they have failed to comply to your CCA request just something along the lines of the documents supplied do not comply etc and hold back the reason why for a later date. Don't give them any more info than you have to at this time.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had already sent a (standard template) letter saying the what they had sent was wrong and they replied saying they they had fulfilled their requirement under the Cons. Credit Act etc...

 

i notice on your signature dpick that you state 'settled in full' on your MBNA account - they paid you or you had to pay them? or you had it written off?

 

what are the next steps for me if they fail to provide a signed agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

i notice on your signature dpick that you state 'settled in full' on your MBNA account - they paid you or you had to pay them? or you had it written off?

 

 

They firstly removed all charges and interest applied to the charges, then as a gesture of good will without admitting the account was unenforceable zeroised the account.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok - i finally got the full monty thru under a SAR!

 

it appears from their records that my account was opened in November 2006! I thought it was before that.

 

the 'signed' credit agreement is in the form of a checkbox and disclaimer saying this tick represents my signature!

 

i suppose that changes everything now?! :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've won, if a tick box has not been ticked by you or you did not tell them to tick it then they have presented a non negotiable agreement and that can be deemed unfair. an Unfair relationship nulifies the contract and you can ask for it to be put aside in part or the whole of it cancelled by a judge. You need to look at the regulatons such as UTCCR 1999. It is available on the internet in PDF format.

 

The other regulations are the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and 2006.

 

Unfair Relationships; Enterprise Act 2002; OFT Guidance 854 May 2008,

 

Irresponsible Lending OFT Guidance 1107con July 2009

 

regards

 

ieuan

Edited by ieuanMr
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...