Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I feel so drained by all this! Please help me!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5326 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

I have a default originally with Bank, Capquest took over debt in 2007 . I did the CCA request, and they only sent me my signed agreement which is original. However they have not complied with my other request which was the signed true copy of the default notice!

 

I am confused. Are they allowed to do this if I requested the true copy of the default Notice? Have Capquest DC entered into default now as their time frime has passed and all they managed to send was the signed copy of agreement but not the other request.

 

Please help. If they are in the wrong what do I write back, is there a template letter for this? Or shall I just send them a letter saying that they have defaulted because they did not comply with all my requests?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you scan the agreement, remove identifying details & post it up? Just because it has your signature on doesn't automatically make it enforceable.

They don't have to provide a copy of the default notice with a CCA request & even if you sent a SAR it is unlikely that the original creditor could provide a copy either.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you scan the agreement, remove identifying details & post it up? Just because it has your signature on doesn't automatically make it enforceable.

They don't have to provide a copy of the default notice with a CCA request & even if you sent a SAR it is unlikely that the original creditor could provide a copy either.

 

It is an application form that they have sent me. It is not even a proper agreement that sttaes the terms etc! I think I need to disput this as this is not a credit agreement! It's an app form!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this;

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

This account is in Dispute .

 

On xx/xx/2009 I wrote to xxxxxxxxx requesting that xxxxxxx supply me a true copy of the executed credit agreement for this account.

In response to this request I was supplied a mere application form which did not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The document sent purporting to be a credit agreement does not contain any of the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required. Suffice to say none of the terms are present in the document

 

Since this document does not contain the required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3) consumer Credit Act 1974, which states

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This situation is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

In addition should you continue to pursue me for this debt you will be in breach of the OFT guidelines, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on debt collection

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I refer to page 5 of the guidance which states;

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment.

 

I require you to produce a compliant copy of my credit agreement to confirm I am liable to you or any organisation, which you represent for this alleged debt, if you cannot do so I require written clarification that this is the case. Should you ignore this request I will report you to the Office of Fair Trading to consider your suitability to hold a credit licence in addition to a complaint to Trading Standards, as you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40

 

Since the agreement is unenforceable and the default notice is non compliant, it would be in everyone’s interest to consider the matter closed and for your client to write the debt off. I suggest you give serious consideration to this as any attempt of litigation will be vigorously defended and I will counter claim for all quantifiable damages

 

I respectfully request a response to this letter in 14 days

 

 

I trust this out lines the situation

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this;

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

This account is in Dispute .

 

On xx/xx/2009 I wrote to xxxxxxxxx requesting that xxxxxxx supply me a true copy of the executed credit agreement for this account.

In response to this request I was supplied a mere application form which did not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The document sent purporting to be a credit agreement does not contain any of the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required. Suffice to say none of the terms are present in the document

 

Since this document does not contain the required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3) consumer Credit Act 1974, which states

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This situation is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

In addition should you continue to pursue me for this debt you will be in breach of the OFT guidelines, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on debt collection

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I refer to page 5 of the guidance which states;

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment.

 

I require you to produce a compliant copy of my credit agreement to confirm I am liable to you or any organisation, which you represent for this alleged debt, if you cannot do so I require written clarification that this is the case. Should you ignore this request I will report you to the Office of Fair Trading to consider your suitability to hold a credit licence in addition to a complaint to Trading Standards, as you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40

 

Since the agreement is unenforceable and the default notice is non compliant, it would be in everyone’s interest to consider the matter closed and for your client to write the debt off. I suggest you give serious consideration to this as any attempt of litigation will be vigorously defended and I will counter claim for all quantifiable damages

 

I respectfully request a response to this letter in 14 days

 

 

I trust this out lines the situation

Print name do not sign

 

Thnaks you so much, in their letter their saying I need to reply by the 12th September or they will start proceedings against me! How can they start threats when they've not even supplied me with the things I asked for. They did not even send me a Default notice copy which is what I asked for in the CCA!

 

Shall I give them a time limit to get back to me? 7 days is a good amount of time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you send the 'in dispute' letter above there isn't a time limit per se it just means that until they provide an enforceable agreement they cannot pursue collection activities. As for the default notice, they rarely keep copies of these so would be unlikely to be able to provide you with one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you send the 'in dispute' letter above there isn't a time limit per se it just means that until they provide an enforceable agreement they cannot pursue collection activities. As for the default notice, they rarely keep copies of these so would be unlikely to be able to provide you with one.

 

Thanks for that. I have a default which I'm trying to have them remove. If they do not have signed agreement- they should remove the default! This is silly! So how long do I have to wait for all this ... they could just not get back to me! 'until the provide an enforceable agreement' this could take ages!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Information Commissioner takes the view that provided they have proof of activity on the account then they can put defaults on your credit reports without an agreement. The route you need to go down to get them removed is that the account was terminated without a default notice so was rescinded before the defaults were entered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Information Commissioner takes the view that provided they have proof of activity on the account then they can put defaults on your credit reports without an agreement. The route you need to go down to get them removed is that the account was terminated without a default notice so was rescinded before the defaults were entered.

 

Thank you for replying. But How can I go down that route if they won't provide me with a copy of the DN? As suggested by other posts if you read them people are are saying that I would be lucky to get one and that they just say they do not have the copy etc.... Shall I demand for a DN in my Dispute letter? Shall I mention that they should dremove the default on the basis that they have not sent me a copy of the default notice? Neither have they sent me enforceable credit agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Information Commissioner takes the view that provided they have proof of activity on the account then they can put defaults on your credit reports without an agreement. The route you need to go down to get them removed is that the account was terminated without a default notice so was rescinded before the defaults were entered.

 

Someone..... please help.... shall I include in the disput letter that they have not answered either of my request????

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try sending the original creditor a sar listing all the information you require including default notice, termination notice, statements etc.,. http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca

 

I do not have time for a SAR, they want a reply by the 12 sept

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they start proceedings, which is highly doubtful, you can have it set aside because you are in dispute and they have failed to provide an enforceable agreement. Even if it got to court they can be brought to 'strict proof' which means they have to produce the original signed enforceable agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I requested a CCA From Capquest and te original creditors Halifax recently, Halifax said to deal with Capquest as they sold the debt in 2008. I Asked for true signed copy of Credit agreement and they replied back with an Application form! The overdraft was a student overdraft I took out in 2001. The bank replied saying they don't have to supply with a true signed copy (which I kinda knew) However Capquest still tried to send me an application form which is not enforceable (not knowing I had a student account!) Worth a try though I tell ya! I then replied disputing that they have entered into default as they have not produced requested docs in time frame given.

 

HOWEVER they have now replied saying that they have checked and there is no record of a postal order sent so the time frame does not apply to them! Their also saying extra 30 calender days which I know is rubbish! SO what do I do now? Please help me guys as I am getting so confused with all this!

 

Shall I tell them I sent a cheque for a pound?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never sent the £1 postal order when requesting CCA- I requested from Halifax and CAPQUEST DCA where the debt was sold to! the DCA has replied saying that they do not see any records for the postal order- so their saying the 12+2 days does not apply- IS THIS TRUE?

 

 

Yes

 

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

To check on if a postal order has been cashed you can dial.

01246-542091

 

or write to them on

Post Ofiice

1 Future Walk

West Bars

Chesterfield

S49 1PF

 

and be sure to give them the serial number of the Postal Order...

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...