Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The end of free banking... It'll never happen!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5720 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Talking about free banking, has anyone else noticed that over the last year cheques have been quietly fazed out? Since we all have a debit card and cash point cards the banks now only let us have money that is our own and if they simply refuse d/d and s/o that we have no money to cover we couldn't get into debt with the banks but would be chased by the company we tried to pay instead.

I think cheques have been phased out gradually over the last 20 years - since the invention of the debit card. This is more the fault of Joe public and retailers than the banks I suspect, who will just meet whatever the demand is.

 

I can't remember the last time I used a cheque - even the milkman takes plastic :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

And now the banks (or more accurately the card companies) are in hot water for the fees they charge. I love progress, cheques which cost me nothing are replaced with a 'convenient' card which more and more companies pass on the fees they are charged to the consumer. Or maybe I'm just in a bad mood today :p

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I do not work for a bank, I am an unfortunate consumer. I am 60 years old and remember well the old banking system whre you were charged so much per cheque (in advance when the cheque book was issued) and were also charged per transaction.

 

Let's face facts boys and girls, bans are there, bot to provide any kind of service, but primarily to make as much money as possible for their shareholders. Whether banking is free or fee based is largely irrelevant. They are going to make the same amount of money whichever way they run. Every time successive governments have introduced laws and/or regulations to control banks 'excesses', the banking industry jointly and severally have fought viciously to maintain their current status quo. When they have eventually had to grudgingly concede ground, they immediately recoup their original position in some other devious way, working their way through the law and the system like rats through a sewer pipe. It is no accident that money tends to be referred to as 'Filthy Lucre'.

 

There are a number of glaring eroors on this thread:

 

1. Not everyone has or can get a debit card. I can assure you that there are hundreds of thousands of the poorest and ,ost vulnerable who cannot get one.

 

2. Cheques are being phased out because it is approaching the time when Banks will be forced to clear cheques overnight. Banks claim it is a security issue but we all know that it is not. On the same subject, 'Working Days'. We all know that banks and financial institutions process transactions 24/7 every day of the year except Christmas day, so why pretend that only Monday to Friday are working days?

 

3. I have been reliably informed by a very senior banking official (a few years ago admittedly) that every £1 left in a bank account for twenty four hours makes the bank around 25 pence. That is a lot of money isn't it?

 

4. Has anyone realised that to some people like a state pensioner (or Pension Credit recipient) receiving the bare minimum legal income, even £5.00 per month bank fee would be a sore blow.

 

People. The only way that the banking industry can be made to toe the line is to hit them where it hurts. Successive governments have shied away from making any real effort to control the banks.

 

I know if I were in a position to do so I would call the Financial Mandarins together and tell them, Act in a fair and equitable manner as set forth by the regulators or see ALL you profits treated as windfalls and taxed at 70%, with immediate effect. The sound of rectums snapping shut would be deafening. The there would be a scramble to make themselves APPEAR as consumer friendly as possible. Lets face it guys the banks make obscene profits and pay very little tax.

 

Just my take on things, I am an ordinary man, the man in the street, or as a judge so succinctly one put it, 'The Man on The Clapham Omnibus'. But in common with al;most everyone else I have been subject to the 'abus' of financial institutions of one kind or another for most of my life, so forgive me if my view is somewhat jaded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...