Serfarce Fraud/ deception lets get them!!!!

[ohitsonlyme]

My appeal against my own victory has been refused by the high court on the following grounds and I need urgent help in order to go forward.

 

grounds for refusal as follow:

 

1/ tThe amount of the appeal is distressingly small by high court llitigation in net terms some £250 I apreciate Mr onlyme feels strongly but questions of proportinality do arise.

2/ costs are preeminantly a discretionary jursidiction in which an appeal court will be slow to interfere. Further the master is entitled to rely on his knowledgeand experience a strict requirement of evidnce is not always called for

3/I can see nothing in the grounds that the master awarded costs under heads or in amounts he was disentitled from awarding.

As to the intial visit it is also said that the regualtion prohibits a £120 fee for the visit but no argument or even discussion of regulation is produced to justify the assertion. The assesment of the judgement debtor costs was also one open to the master

 

 

 

I am disgusted that the appeal has been refused this is typical of the old boys network seeing that £250 is "distressingly small" and totally ignoring justice.

 

I am not dismayed and have 7 days to ask for an oral hearing for the decsion to be reconsiderred, which of course I am going to do

Any advice or input will be apreciated.

Onlyme

[lets fight bailiffs]

if £250 is too small to be dealt with at the high court then it must be a small claim track you need if you do this at money claim online it will cost £25 but if you do it at your local court it will cost £30.

[ohitsonlyme]

if £250 is too small to be dealt with at the high court then it must be a small claim track you need if you do this at money claim online it will cost £25 but if you do it at your local court it will cost £30.

 

Good thought LFB but,I wouldnt get past the first hurdle with a small claims due to the high court protection placed in the order by the master, I am determined to continue at the high court and need to know procedures/ tactics

 

onlyme

[wonkeydonkey]

Good thought LFB but,I wouldnt get past the first hurdle with a small claims due to the high court protection placed in the order by the master, I am determined to continue at the high court and need to know procedures/ tactics

 

onlyme

 

Again its that battle that arises due to the courts giving protection to HCEO's who have blatently comitted the criminal act of fraud. I fail to comprehend where the boundries are, Hco's commit blatent fraud and the court protects them from being answerable yet if I were to commit the same fraud... am I protected from prosecution?

 

We know the answer don't we?

 

WD

[High Court Enforcer]

Subbing with interest

[lets fight bailiffs]

If i have this right then the hearing you attended was an interpleader an interpleader is for the HCEO to withdraw from the proceedings thus under rule 17 of the high court interpleader rules get the protection.

 

However the rute that should have been taken should be a detailed assesment you have not yet taken this rute as far as i can see anyway so therefore you still have this option to take because a detailed assesment can not take place before all other action has ceased therefore the protection that has been given has nothing at all to do with fee's.

 

LFB

[ohitsonlyme]

I spoke to the high court today and apparently it is easier than I thought I have requested an oral hearing, in order to put my case across.

Watch this space!!!

 

Nice to have you on board HCE all positive input will be apreciated and all BS ignored

onlyme

[lets fight bailiffs]

In that case the court has advised that you appeal the last judgement and the next stage is for an oral appeal.

 

LFB

[alias barneyrubble]

Whoop Whoop oral hearing granted its back to london we go!!

onlyme

[ploddertom]

Whoop Whoop oral hearing granted its back to london we go!!

onlyme

 

Are you flogging ringside seats yet? Go get 'em.

 

PT

[ohitsonlyme]

I was wondering where our freindly high court enforcer has gone!!

I asked if his name was Clare in my last post to Him/Her and he /she hasnt been seen since.

 

Any one got any ideas??

[seanamarts]

You dont know??? Lets say the powers that be had it under control

I dont think we will be hearing from HCE any more, well not in that name any way

[ohitsonlyme]

Tell us more!!! I am Intrigued

Though it was something I said

I always say keep your friends close and your enemies closer

 

onlyme

[seanamarts]

nothing to tell, he overstepped the mark on many occasion and I am sure he was bought to task over it.

[letsmakeamark]

He wasnt the head of sherforce was he ?

[seanamarts]

He wasnt the head of sherforce was he ?

Now wouldnt that be a funny thing

[letsmakeamark]

Now wouldnt that be a funny thing

 

If xxxxxx was asked a question. Then i think it might have been.

Edited July 26, 2010 by letsmakeamark

[ohitsonlyme]

He wasnt the head of sherforce was he ?

 

If claire was asked a question. Then i think it might have been.

 

I posted the text below on 28th June HCE disappeared the next day Hmmmm

Originally Posted by High Court Enforcer

I always watch things that relate to High Court Enforcement.

 

After all his bravado on here, it is not suprising that ohitsonlyme has gone very quiet.....

 

He clearly lost.

 

HCE You clearly cannot read as reported previously yes I lost my appeal against my victory but I still won !!!!!

 

The fraud still took place and the police report has gone to the MOJ and Essex police

 

However I am sure it cost sherforce far more than it cost me

 

They had a top solicitor and his assistant there for at least 2hours I bet the bill they got was far more than they managed to defraud me out of and as yet I am still not finished

 

I thank you for reminding me to be a royal pain in the arse to sherfraud and their ilk

The police are very much onto them and my assistance is there for albeit so he can learn from my previous lack experience

 

Send clare sandbrook my love I am sure she loves you soo much for keeping me on my toes

(unless of course you are clare sandbrook!!)

 

Onlyme and many many more

[SidewalkProphet]

Hi, a close friend has been visited by Shergroup baliffs for a debt that they owe yesterday when i was at there flat. We didnt answer the door and the bailiff stuck a letter through the door. The debt was £578 and he has added over £1000 to for their High Court Officer charges. They have ceased ‘all goods in the property’. My friend called them and they said pay it all or well take all your stuff. She has no money and the flat is rented by council. She is on JSA. The bailiff costs are huge are these right? What should she do? I hope someone can help on here, thank you.

[seanamarts]

Hi and welcome,

 

It would be best if you could start a new thread with regards to this matter, that way you wont be lost amongst this one.

[brassnecked]

Hi, a close friend has been visited by Shergroup baliffs for a debt that they owe yesterday when i was at there flat. We didnt answer the door and the bailiff stuck a letter through the door. The debt was £578 and he has added over £1000 to for their High Court Officer charges. They have ceased ‘all goods in the property’. My friend called them and they said pay it all or well take all your stuff. She has no money and the flat is rented by council. She is on JSA. The bailiff costs are huge are these right? What should she do? I hope someone can help on here, thank you.

 

Here is a thread for you to post up details, I don't thingk a HCEO can do a global seizure as in all goods in the property though.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=168