Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hi Ccj Issue :)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

i have just had a CCJ in defualt from Howdens

 

I had a few months back April i think court papers through but i made a payment scheme with them so it didnt go to court

 

however they would only except the payment paid of in three payments and ignored my request to use a income exp form.

 

these payments of 600 plus were not affordable and i could not continue to pay

 

i do not pay for two months and have recently recieved a CCJ in defualt

 

Howdens did not reissue a court date and i had no paper work at all, until i recieved the CCJ.

 

I am now applying for a N244 and have stated i recieved no warning or payment scheme

 

however i cannot argue that i do not own the money

 

any thoughts cheers james

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis that you haven't got any argument that you don't owe the money there wouldn't seem to be much point in applying for a set-aside as it will only lead to you being defeated in a full hearing even if initially successful.

 

The only exception to this would be if Howdens were willing to settle out of court - so that, after the set-aside, they didn't then go to a full hearing. However, I can't think why they would want to do that as they've got a rock-solid judgment debt now.

 

On second thoughts there is another option - if you could get the set-aside and then pay the debt back in full before the full hearing, you would avoid a CCJ against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fiscal

 

It sounds as though Howdens may have applied for judgment despite the agreement they made with you to accept payments.

 

What was your debt in connection with? eg a credit card, loan etc?

If so, you need to consider the following to decide if you have a case for a set aside:

 

1. Have you ever had any unlawful charges aplied to your account eg over limit, late payment? If so, have you ever reclaimed them?

 

2. Have you ever applied for a copy of your credit agreement? If so, is it enforceable?

 

3. Have you ever received a default notice prior to terminating your account/court action? If so, did it fully comply with statute eg. no of days given for rectifying; amount claimed etc.

 

4. Has the debt been assigned & if so, did you receive a notice of assignment?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis that you haven't got any argument that you don't owe the money there wouldn't seem to be much point in applying for a set-aside as it will only lead to you being defeated in a full hearing even if initially successful.

Sorry, but I disagree, whether you owe the money or not, these companies have to follow court procedures.

If they haven't issued the correct default notices, & more importantly you were not given the opportunity to defend this claim. This gives you the opportunity to apply for a set a side.

Owing the money is a moral issue. Following Court procedures is a legal requirement. Courts should only deal with the law.

 

I would suggest you use CPR 31.14. Forcing them to provide you with all paperwork they would require to enforce this debt,loan agreement, default notices...They have 7 days to respond.

 

Good Luck

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest you use CPR 31.14. Forcing them to provide you with all paperwork they would require to enforce this debt,loan agreement, default notices...They have 7 days to respond.

 

Good Luck

 

CPR 31.14 can only be used when already in proceedings. if that is not the case CPR 31.16 would be the better option:

 

THREADS:

 

31.14:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/159445-getting-them-reveal-their.html

 

31.16:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

 

should the £10 fee not be a problem i would also suggest a SAR to the original creditors regstd address, sent recd del with printed or disguised signature. however, this will only be of use should the case go further as they get 40 days in which to reply, outside your time to apply to set aside.

 

you really need to answer FGs questions in order to see if u have grounds to set aside this judgment.

CPR part 13 deals with this:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/parts/part13.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow guys thanks for the advice, howdens is a kitchin company its a trade account, the main problems was i was thye asked for me to pay the balance to quickly ie 4 months 600 a month

 

they had a court date and i recieved the papers

 

i then contacted them and agreed to pay the 600 and made the first payment

 

i could not make the second payment as it was not a fair payment and left me a risk of not paying the mortgage

 

I recieved the CCJ a month later in default

 

i never recieved a new court date with the new balance owed and so did not put in a defence or set up monthly payments

 

I am putting in a set aside to agree payments that are reasonable and fiar based on my income / exp and other debters

 

Plus i am stating the court procedure were not followed correctly

 

cheers james

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am putting in a set aside to agree payments that are reasonable and fiar based on my income / exp and other debters

 

Plus i am stating the court procedure were not followed correctly

 

 

IMO this won't get you your set aside.

 

Can you answer the questions in post 3 & post up details of the POC & the judgment (minus personal details)?

 

Also did you acknowledge the claim to the court i.e. send back the form that came with the POC? And did you submit a defence? Or did you just phone Howdens & come to an 'agreement'?

  • Haha 1

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as foolishgirl has already advised, the reason you propose for a set aside is not valid.

 

have a look at these links for info -

 

Setting aside the original CCJ of your CCA

 

CCJ removal inc. step by step guide

 

As advised, do post up the Particulars of Claim (POC) and the Judgment Order.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You had a court date and didn't realise that it was still on because you thought you were still in negotiation with the creditor. This might, at a push, be a good enough reason to get a set-aside. But even if it is then, as I have already said, you still have to face a full hearing. As you don't have any defence this would seem rather pointless - and will mean you will incur extra costs when you lose (which you will).

 

Would I be right in thinking that your main concern is that you are unable to pay the judgment debt within 14 days? If that is the case then I think your best bet is to apply for a variation order - where the court can order that you pay the debt off in instalments rather than all at once.

 

Debbbbsy: I wasn't suggesting that the claimants shouldn't follow the proper procedure - but it seems from what James has said, that they have followed the correct procedure and have left their court date (which he was aware of) open and then turned up when he defaulted again. This is all within the proper procedure. Moreover, if the proper procedure hasn't been followed then the court have to allow the set-aside (they don't have any discretion). But my point is that the set-aside is not an outcome - in this case it is, at best, a delay of the inevitable (and an increase in costs).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I wasn't suggesting that the claimants shouldn't follow the proper procedure - but it seems from what James has said, that they have followed the correct procedure and have left their court date (which he was aware of) open and then turned up when he defaulted again. This is all within the proper procedure.

 

That was my thought too chauvesouris - all legal just not above board. :-|

 

If the assumption is correct, chauvesouris is right fiscal, you would be throwing good money after bad to look for a set aside. Go for the variation & move on with your life.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardon me for poking my nose in, and I may be talking out of my hat here..but..

 

How long ago did you apply for the set aside... is there any way you can contact the court and stop it??

 

'As an LIP you made an error in the procedure and it was a Variation order you wanted and not a set aside'.. maybe if it hasn't gone to far you may be able to withdraw it... just a thought..:cool:

 

I'll stand back now while I'm pelted with rotten tomatoes by the 'informed' caggers...:oops:

 

Spam. :)

  • Haha 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point spam.

 

Phone the court fiscal & see if it has been processed, they may take pity on you & it would save you another fee.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...