Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax - dodgy default - agreement now terninated, help!


mikexlr8
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 227
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Having refused to speak to Wescot about my Halifax account for the past few weeks I today received an official-looking letter from 'Nelson Guest & Partners, Solicitors' saying they've been instructed by Wescot who are 'considering legal action'. "We have suggested to our client that they should consider a settlement from you", which is very nice of them.

 

While googling Nelson Guest I came across this entertaining comment, apparently from a Wescot employee:

 

i think your ALL full of BULL S*IT, you all know you owe this money but refuse to part with any money you recieve from state benefits which HONEST people like wescot employees pay you through there tax. Pay up and stop being old moaning Women you stingy twats - you had the credit and deserve companies like wescot on you fat backsides

 

-- wescot wonder boy ([email protected]), January 14, 2004.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE: Letter today from Halifax.

 

The letter is regarding my query of the £7.05 they claim I agreed to pay Blair, Oliver and Scott plus my assertation that the account no longer exists as they terminated the agreement following a dodgy default.

 

They say the £7.05 figure was based on the same amount they claim was my last payment on June 22, 2009 -- Will check my records later today but I do not recall ever making this payment, especially a bizarre random amount like that.

 

Blair, Oliver and Scott claim they have recevied no response to four letters they have sent-- even though all responses were sent recorded and signed for by people at their office. And the fact they have wrote to me today-- Morons.

 

They claim the account does exist because I signed the original agreement in June, 2005. Huh?

 

They recommend I make payments to avoid further collection activity.

 

Any thoughts/ideas?

 

Thanks... Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE: Letter today from Blair, Oliver & Scott containing "notice of intended court action" -- States: "Formal notuce is hereby given that our client has instructed us to commence court proceedings against you without further delay. Papers are now being prepared for commencement of action through your local court to seek a judgement against you... blah blah if your a home owner blah blah..."

 

"Pay now," or else etc.. etc... blah blah...

 

Is this another standard threat-O-gram?

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE: Letter today from Blair, Oliver & Scott containing "notice of intended court action" -- States: "Formal notuce is hereby given that our client has instructed us to commence court proceedings against you without further delay. Papers are now being prepared for commencement of action through your local court to seek a judgement against you... blah blah if your a home owner blah blah..."

 

"Pay now," or else etc.. etc... blah blah...

 

Is this another standard threat-O-gram?

 

It's a template letter. The muppets at blair oliver send that exact same letter out to everyone. LoL. It is a standard threat-O-gram.

]

Link to post
Share on other sites

They ignore all my letters sent recorded 1st class, claim I never respond, phone me and hit a brick wall, and keep sending these legal threats.

 

I would love to go to court.

 

1. Dodgy defaults

 

2. Breach of CCA

 

3. Suspension of interest and penalties even if a judgement does go against me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its a letter before action and needs a response

 

something like this

 

Request for copies of documents- (Civil Procedure Rules 1998: Pre-Action Protocols)

 

Your letter dated XXXX 2010 says that you intend to commence court proceedings against me within 7 days, and that you will issue a claim in my local county court to seek a judgement against me

 

For your assistance, my local county court is XXXXXXXXXXXXX

.

 

IYou have made plain your client’s intention to begin legal proceedings against me. Consequently this matter is now

subject to the*Civil Procedure *Rules as your letter appears to be intended as a “letter before claim”.

 

Therefore take notice that, I request you supply to me within 14 days true copies of the following documents:

 

1) The executed credit agreement incorporating prescribed notices, terms and conditions applicable at the time the agreement was executed, and

 

2) any further or subsequent notices, terms and conditions relied on.

 

If you are unable to supply these documents please confirm discontinuance of your client’s claim.

 

Take note that this request is not made under either CCA 74 or Data Protection Act 98. It is under Annex A paragraph 4.2(7) of the CPR Pre-Action Conduct protocol, for a copy of alleged documents which I believe are relevant but do not have.

 

Should you ignore this request, I shall in due course make another under CPR 27 or 31.14, as appropriate. If you fail to comply with that request, I will ask the court to strike out your client's claim as an abuse of process due to lack of reasonable grounds, or at least order proceedings be stayed pending provision of the requisite documents. The application will refer to this and previous document requests, and apply for costs.

 

FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT, THE ABOVE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS ADMITTING THE EXISTENCE OR VALIDITY OF AN AGREEMENT WITH OR DEBT TO YOU OR ANYONE YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT.

__________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

DiddyDicky -- do BOS or the bank usually respond to these letters?

 

I also have a recent letter from the bank from it's complaints dept. explaining why the are chasing the debt claiming that I have failed to respond to numerous Blair, Oliver & Scott letters -- obviously a nonsence as they wouldn't be contacting me in response to a letter from Blair if Blair had not received any letters from me in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, the value of the letter to you will be later at court if/when they try to apply for costs

 

it's like a game of chess- planning moves in advance!!

 

to expand a little more........

 

lets say that this went to court and you lost

 

the creditor applies for costs

 

you show the judge this correspondence and the judge will say to the creditor

 

"you could have shown the agreement to the defendant months ago when he asked to see it and avoided your costs" - get lost (or words to that effect)

Edited by diddydicky
Link to post
Share on other sites

DiddyDicky -- do BOS or the bank usually respond to these letters?

 

I also have a recent letter from the bank from it's complaints dept. explaining why the are chasing the debt claiming that I have failed to respond to numerous Blair, Oliver & Scott letters -- obviously a nonsence as they wouldn't be contacting me in response to a letter from Blair if Blair had not received any letters from me in the first place.

 

Mikexlr8,

I've sent the same letter to Robbers way, we've now rec'd a letter from Halifax saying their Customer services are looking into it and will get in touch soon?

 

I recommend you send the letter at least if it goes to court you can show that you have acted correctly and they just ignore you;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

TWO UPDATEs:

 

Firstly I got a letter today from iQor Recovery services on behalf of CAPITAL BANK?!?!?!

 

No word from Halifax that they sold the debt. Should I send them the 'do not acknowledge letter' as I have never had any deelings with Capital. the muppets at iQor may have put the wrong bank on the letter.

 

Second, response from Halifax in relation to sending letter sent, "Request for copies of documents- (Civil Procedure Rules 1998: Pre-Action Protocols"

 

They state, "I am sorry to advise you that I am declining your complaint.... I can confirm a copy of the document has been requested and will be sent to you under different cover, however for the avoidence of doubt, failure to supply this document does not warrant the cessation of legal action. Indeed, if the document is not provided it is up to the courts to decide whether the claim can be pursued."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikexlr8,

 

just bumping this for you. OH rec'd a response from Helifax and I will be posting it later on my thread, can't really work out if they are going to be seeking legal action or if they're just going to continue chasing and marking CRF.

 

Anyway, hope someone comes along soon to give you some advise.

Joemay:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Halifax thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/222366-halifax-another-dodgy-dn.html

 

Today I today received "a formal notice of court action" from Robinson Way Ltd "authorised by HBOS". Unless I pay in full within ten days they "may take action".

 

Don' want to hi-jack your thread mikexlr8, so nks22 will post on your thread.

Edited by joemay
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

UPDATE: New letter from iQOR.

 

They're offering me a great discount to clear the debt butr I have to call them to find out what it is. If I don't call within 72 hours they are sending the boys round to discuss full payment.

 

*gulp*

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was that sound the thud of your jaw hitting the floor, and your pants filling with liquid fear?

 

If they're coming round, ask them to bring the paperwork which shows a legally enforceable debt - it will save them the postage!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...