Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

O2 & Wescot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5208 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I wonder if anyone out there can help me with a problem I have with O2?

 

In May 2008 I was made redundant from my job and I advised O2 of the situation and that I may have difficulties maintaining payment of my contract (18 Months due to end June 09), At first O2 were sympathetic and helpful, but when I missed a coulpe of payments their attitute changed and this eventually resulted in them terminating the contract and adding a punitive charge of £80 to the account.

 

In March 09 I sent to them a bank cheque for £100 ( £163 claimed by O2) and in my covering letter I made it quite clear that if they accepted payment then it was in full and final settlement of all money owed to them. I also requested that they send the payment back if this offer was not accepted,

 

To cut a long story short, O2 cashed the cheque but did not reply to me. I heard nothing further for a couple of months and then started receiving demands for payment of the balance from Wescot Credit Services Ltd. I advised Westcot of the situation and after much correspondance they have stated as follows "...our client (O2) have advised they did not agree a settlement of £100 on this account. The reason the payment was cashed is because O2 accept payments that they receive towards the balance owing. The balance is correct and due".

 

Is this just a "try on" by Wescot or am I correct in my assumption that a valid binding agreement has been entered into by virtue of the fact that there has been an offer, acceptance and consideration paid?

 

What do you recommend that I do next? is it worth applying for a SAR? Your advice will be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st Welcome to CAG

 

It's always better to deal with the original creditor (o2). Write to westcot telling them you refuse to deal with them as you have a dispute over this with o2. Modify this letter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/574-letter-when-account-has-been-passed-on-whilst-agreement-request-is-in-dispute (take out the CCA stuff as it's not applicable on mobile contracts) and send it to Westcot

 

Your issues with them accepting the payment of £100 should be raised with o2.

 

Now you say they added a "punitive charge". Was that to pay for the remainder of a minimum term?

 

In my experience the worst they will do is send DCA's after you and threaten court action (and trash your credit rating for the 6 years after your last bill). I trust that you have a copy of the letter you sent with the £100 cheque, just in case they do take it to court. I'm not sure how binding your agreement is with them cashing the cheque but on the £63 I can't see them doing anything other than blowing hot air.

 

Just my thoughts and a bump to the top of the forum.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx lucutus,

 

Luckily, I kept a copy of my offer letter enclosing £100. the "punitive charge" relates to a sum added to the contract by O2 on termination. They said that they would credit my a/c with this sum on payment of balance!

 

I will send the suggested letter to O2 and will post an update in due course. I also believe that Wescot are "blowing hot air"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Following advice from lucutus I sent the amended "account in dispute" letter to both O2 and Wescott. Surprise, surprise, I did not receive a reply from O2 and Westcott sent me a "Final Notice " letter in red ink demanding payment of £63.48!!

 

I subsequently sent Wescott a letter reminding them of their breach of the OFT debt collection guidelines on unfair business practices July 2003 (updated December 2006) and insisting that they stop all enfocement action.

 

I then received a letter in reply from their "compliance" team advising me that instructions were being sought from O2 and and a subsequent letter stating that although O2 received my offer letter and payment they "accept any payment towards the debt where there is a balance owing"!!!

 

Quite clearly they have been caught out as they did not read my letter and by accepting my offer and not returning the payment to me they have created a legally binding contract. I have today written to Wescott to advise them of this fact and remind them of their obligations under s.28 of OFT guidelines.

 

Will update again when I receive the next letter!!!!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Look forward to it being in your favor!

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their action ()2) is par for the course. They are of course quite correct, the payment methods are separated and processed, which is a massive inconvenecne to them - especially as they haven't a legt to stand on.

 

Whilst you are waiting for a response, this is a good time to check your credit file to see if there is anying untowars showing - like saying there is still a final balance due when your F&F cheque should have cleared it. It is important you to this as you have their attention and THIS is the time to ensure they resolve any issues outstanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks locutus and buzby,

 

I expect to receive yet another letter from Wescott stating that O2 accepted the payment but deny it was in full and final settlement and again threatening bailiff action. When this happens, I will lodge a complaint with OFT.

 

I have suggested to O2 that they take legal action against me so that the County court can decide on this matter. For some reason, O2 don't want to follow this course of action. I wonder if they are affraid of losing and setting a precedent!!!!!!

 

Anyway, I will follow buzby's advice a check my credit file and send the appropriate CAG letter to remove any incorrect entries.

 

Will let you know what happens. Thanks everyone for all the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some misconceptions - the OFT do not deal with individuals. In your case, if they do not agree to your version of events, they take you to court and you provide evidence of their bad faith. They'll lose.

 

Any contact from a DCA should be countered with the 'account is in dispute'. They may not take you to court, which is why you must ensure they do not lodge adverse data - if they do, you may have to take THEM to court to enforce removal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

buzby,

 

Thanks for your advice. I have already sent the CAG template letter for "account in dispute" to Wescott. and have asked them for a full explanation as to why they are attempting to collect on a disputed debt. I have also made a complaint to them as I believe they have breached the OFT guidelines on debt collection and asked for details of their complaint resolution proceedure.

 

Am I right that if this situation continues, I can refer them to Trading Standards for breach of the OFT guidelines, and CPUTR?

 

Sorry for asking so many questions!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could indeed, but this relies on your local council TS, remembering to take this up as an issue for referral to the TS management meetings to raise the matter with the OFT. I take the view 'why bother'? I'd have better thing to do with my time. Keep your actions short and sharp, and protect your interests above all else. At the end of the day, when all a firms has to do is apologise for a 'staff error' and then get away with it, makes a mockery of the time and effort in pursuing it. (So I don't bother!) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE - have today received another "standard" letter from Wescot in reply to my CAG "account in dispute" letter. Instead of providing a copy of their complaints procedure as requested, Wescot have provided me with a copy of the Banking Code.

 

Before I email the FOS, can anyone confirm whether DCA's are covered by the Banking Code or some other regulatory body?

 

Also, Wescot have not provided a timescale to deal with my complaint and have stated that they will contact me in "due course" Am I right in my belief that without a timescale Wescot have only 8 weeks to reply before I can lodge a formal complaint with the FOS?

 

Any advice will be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just spoken with the consumer advice line at the Financial Ombudsman Service. They have advised me that DCA's chasing telecommunications debts are NOT covered by the ombudsman service.

 

So, it would appear as though Wescot have lied to me again and have failed to comply with the CAG "acount in dispute" letter by not supplying details of their complaints procedure. I think it is time to write them another letter!!!

 

By the way, all complaints have to be feferred to OFCOM or OTELO and not FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that's refering to complaints about the mobile provider, not the DCA.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/195265-complaining-oft.html

If it's from a financial insitution the FOS do take the complaint I believe, which is probably what is confusing the westcot brain cell.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE - I have today received a reply from Office of Fair Trading. As expected, they are unable to deal with my complaint. However, they have stated that they will "consider my complaint alongside other complaints that they have or will received with regard to any consumer credit licensing or other action we may decide to take"

 

In view of this I would strongly recommend that anyone facing poblems with Wescot should download the OFT complaint form from CAG and complete and submit it to the OFT asap. The more complaints they receive, the more chance that action will be taken against this DCA.

 

In the meantime, Westcot have been surprisingly quiet since my last correspondance to them!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have today received the standard "we are looking into your complaint" letter from Westcot. This is now the 4th letter I have received from them in the last couple of months saying the same thing!!! I wonder why they are finding it so difficult to contact O2 to obtain instructions!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Result - Yesterday I received a really grovelling letter from Wescot in reply to my numerous letters pointing out to them the breach of contract law carried out by O2. Basically Wescot have said that they were only following instructions from O2 in pursuing this matter! (I recall from my history lessons at school that Nazi war criminals said much the same thing at the Nuremberg trials about exterminating jews!!!!).

 

Wescot have stated that they will not take any further action, have closed their file stating that I contact O2 in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...