Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ridgeworth fairmile recoveries [AIC] and old Nationwide loan - new default registered.


chesterbing
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for your reply not sure if Natiowide placed a default on my cra file in 2001 but would assume they did.at the time i grouped several debts into a package with consumer credit councelling service but could not continue paying them due to me losing my job and ill health. I would say its statue barred as i defaulted on the debt in 2001. Ridgeworth has brought the debt in 2006 .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Update

I am wits end with this case so any input would be greatly appreciated after many phonecalls at letters the situation is as follows

The orginal loan was taken out in December 1997 I defaulted on this in 1999 and Grouped all my debts in a debt management plan with Consumer Credit Councelling service.

Again I defaulted on this due to redundancy but paid most creditors off by CCJs which are all now settled except the Nationwide one which has resurfaced from nowhere.

Nationwide confirm that they sold the debt in May 2006 to Redcastle Recoveries which seems to be the same address as ridgeworth fairmile who recorded a default on my Credit Refrence file in June 2006.

I have complained to the ico office about this who say there is little they can do as Ridgeworth Fairmile have recorded non payment in 2006.

i have had no letters for ridgeworth Fairmile or Nationwide between 2001 and 2009. So the debt is statue barred but still shows on my credit file. Neither have I had any contact with Ridgeworth Fairmile by phone or letter entering into a repayment plan with them.

Any idea anyone how or where do I go from here in removing the default from credit refrence file

Edited by chesterbing
spelling errors
Link to post
Share on other sites

well thats what i would have thought when i spoke to natiowide and asked them when they sent me the default notice or that they was selling the debt they said they did not have that information as it was long ago. Although they cpuld tell me date loan was taken out and when they sold the debt . Very strange indeed

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my understanding of CRA's and files, these also only have a shelf life of 6 years from time of entry, namely when the account went into default.

 

The selling and passing on of alleged debts to new owners, should not alter the date of the default or entry date on the file, all that simply happens is that the new owner will put their name on your file against the debt showing that they are now pursuing, or are the owners of the debt.

 

It MUST drop off your file after six years, and in any case cannot show on your file as a default. If this is the case then again it is a case for the ICO to deal with.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is excatly what I thought but Redcastle Recovieries is using Ridgeworth Fairmile Recoveries who is using Response Credit Management all companies under one umbrella but giving Experian and the ISO misleading information and basilcally taking the p..s. This is despite me having proof in writing that I entered into a debt Managment plan in 1999.

Time I think to get a solictor involved to try and unravel whats been going on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, personally I would go back to the ICO, and ask them to clarify their position on this.

If they still give you the same response, I would lodge a formal complaint with them because this is exactly what they are in the business of sorting out.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to ridgeworth fairmile recoveries [AIC] and old Nationwide loan - new default registered.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...