Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problems with Cabot Financial & The Funding Corperation


mbar6844
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am new to this site and am looking for some help.

 

Some time ago I had a letter from Cabot Financial saying they had purchased my loan with The Funding Corperation,

(I was up to date with the payments).

 

I continued making my payments to Cabot by DD.

6 months ago I received a phone call from them for a "review" of my financial situation,

as my wife had just given birth to twins they asked if it would help to reduce my payments for a period, to which I agreed.

 

I continued to make the payments by DD, and heard nothing else until

 

last night when they called me stating that although they were happy with the payments I had been making,

there had been a change in the law and as the payments I made were less than the original agreement

the differance was now being classed as arrears.

 

The upshot being that I had to now pay this whole amount in full or they would register a default on my account.

 

If I thought that reducing the payments would put me in arrears I would never have agreed to this.

 

Please advise. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, typical sort of nasty trick from this company. If they play rough then so should you.

 

CRA them in the first instance and post up their reply minus any personal details.

 

Either now or if they can produce an enforecable agreement, send them a Subject Access Rights notification. In particular you should be looking for a statement of account to check whether they've been adding charges and interest onto your account.

 

Before deciding what to do about the 'arrears' you should do a quick calculation of the total repayments due on the loan against what you've paid in total. In doing so ignore any figures that Cabot have given you. If there is still a balance to pay then you may wish to do so (subject to the response to the CRA and how much you want to avoid a default on the account). If the balance is negative then don't pay them anything for the time being as you're paying charges etc that Cabot have lumped onto the account.

 

Cabot are using the threat of a default to blackmail you. They can't place a default on the account without sending you a properly worded default notice first- if they send you one post it here for checking. They also can't do so if they don't have a valid credit agreement.

 

One final point, don't discuss things on the phone with them unless you're very confident and you record the call. Putting everything in writing is the only way to deal with companies like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just had another phone call from them after I argued the point last night.

 

They are now saying that they have not followed due procedures with my account, and failed to send out any of the letters they should have done, they have now passed it to their legal team?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just had another phone call from them after I argued the point last night.

 

They are now saying that they have not followed due procedures with my account, and failed to send out any of the letters they should have done, they have now passed it to their legal team?

 

Rubbish. It's all bluster designed to confuse and bully you.

 

CRA and possible SARN them. If they call you again go through security and tell them that you want all further communications from them to be in writing. Once you've done this, if they call refuse to go through security and put the phone down.

 

You have to wonder where this company finds the cretins it employs. They had a perfectly performing debt and they've completely messed it up for themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have rung again, and admitted they have made a mistake and they are happy for me to keep making my reduced payments for the next 12 months. They said there had been a clerical error and my account should never have fallen into the "pre-default category".

 

Should I still send the information requests?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's up to you. I suggested earlier that you did a back of a fag packet calculation to see whether you might have already paid off the debt. Did you do this?

 

Cabot buy debts for less than their face value and try to collect the full nominal value. Over and above this they tend to add spurious charges and sometimes extra-contractual interest. It's a horribly exploitative business model. My inclination would be to insist on receiving a full statement of account (using the SARN if necessary to check what, if anything, they've done.

 

The CRA is a bit more controversial as it suggests that you may be seeking to avoid the debt (in their view) but, given how they operate, I would encourage anyone dealing with Cabot to make them jump through every hoop imaginable. The country would be a better place if the likes of this company went to the wall.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can Cabot threaten a default?, If this account was sold by the Funding Corporation as a debt account, surely it must have already been defaulted before the sale. Therefore Cabot can't issue a second default?

 

Can someone explain if I've got this wrong, as my OH has a sort of similiar issue going on with Cabot over a default notice they've issued.

 

I'd still send off that SAR and CCA request as advised, Cabot are well known for alleged dubious tactics.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can Cabot threaten a default?, If this account was sold by the Funding Corporation as a debt account, surely it must have already been defaulted before the sale. Therefore Cabot can't issue a second default?

 

Can someone explain if I've got this wrong, as my OH has a sort of similiar issue going on with Cabot over a default notice they've issued.

 

I'd still send off that SAR and CCA request as advised, Cabot are well known for alleged dubious tactics.:)

 

Yes, you're correct that you can't have more than default for a single account although it doesn't stop some DCAs from threatening and even placing one. In doing so and with the connivance of the credit reference agencies they can sometimes quite unlawfully blight someone's credit record.

 

In this case however, I don't think the account was already defaulted. The poster said that he had been making full payments until recently and had only then reduced them.

 

Debt Buyers can purchase everything from perfectly performing debt to stuff that is almost statute barred. They can also purchase multiple accounts at the same time containing a complete mix of performance. When this was done between banks it was the sort of thing that led to their near collapse last year and noone really knew what they were getting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There,

 

Sorry to hear your issues with these muppets. I had a bad car accident a few years ago and lost my job and house as I had 2 years off work and did not have adequate protection.

 

I have been paying Cabot £120 a month for 4 years until recently when I found this forum, I have sent them CCA letters and the account will soon be in dispute. I look forward to them phoning me, I tell them their calls are being recorded and start asking them questions about CCA requests, definition of Statute Barred etc and usually respond with "were not sure about that" Then fly in with the how can you demand money from me when you know nothing about debt law or where I stand legally, they usually hang up and give me a day or 2 then we repeat the procedure!

 

Stuff them, CCA them and put up on this forum and then some one (not me as do not know enough really!) will tell you if enforceable.

 

Do not worry these people are idiots! I just wish I knew this 4 years ago as I nearly had a nervous breakdown due to their harassment.

 

Regards and good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...