Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear All,   So Sorry we have been extremely busy with my work and family emergencies as my outlaws, who are in their mid and late eighties are very ill and they needed medical attention at hospitals.    Andy - Case plan is simply a sheet issued by the court to confirm who will be attending for the both parties and at what time the people will each arrive -  apparently, attendies from either side may no arrive together at the court due to Covid.   BN - The Court has not confirmed the discontinuance. A Judge at the Court has to agree to the Discontinuance but that has not yet taken place. We have 28 days to submit a stay to this notice.    FTMDave – I have always followed CAG advice since the first day I spotted the site and joined. CAG has helped me on numerous occasions. My wife did not want to drop the Counter Claim so it was essential I support her and try and talk her out of it gently.   The PCN should never have been issued in the first place because my wife’s parking area is on a private piece of land. A company leased that area of land (Call it Area A) from the main owner. The buildings in Area A is sub-let out to various tenants with Parking facilities; of which, the company my wife worked for is one such tenant.    To reach Area A, my wife has to drive through the main car park (Area B) of the main owner. It is only Area B which Claimants are authorised to police. Area A is NOT under their jurisdiction so they cannot police there. This is still the case to this day and more specifically, this is something which they are fully aware. There is an agreement between the lessors of Area A and the main owner of Area B. This owner would instruct the Claimant not to police Area A.   After the Claimant issued the PCN to my wife, the solicitors of the Lessors of Area A, issued a cease and desist order to them and notified the solicitors of the owner of Area B.. So all they had to do was to cancel the PCN. We have a copy of this letter and so we can substantiate it.   BN + FTMDave – So, there you have it. This is the explanation you wanted. They were told to stop the case and drop it.    But instead, the Claimant pursued the PCN relentlessly even after my wife pleaded with them (before the case) to stop the matter and cancel the PCN and explained the situation with copies of the cease and desist  letter.    We are following CAG’s advice and to do that we need to notify the Court  where: a.       We will apply to the court to have the Notice of Discontinuance set aside. b.       We will also apply to the court to add an additional case against the Claimants for obtaining data on my wife falsely. c.       We will also apply to the Court to add an additional Defendant to our counter claim – that being the bosses of the Claimant – the owner of Area B   After submission of these applications, along the lines suggested by CAG, we will negotiate a settlement with the Claimants   Any further advice from CAG on (b) and (c) above will be very helpful and very welcome.   Thank you BF    
    • scan up the agreement to PDF  read upload carefully please   easy peasy if you have that   dx  
    • Understood. Maybe as a first step it would be a good idea to write to Amazon and tell them that I would have selected the prepaid hermes drop-off option, like I always do, but I wasn't able to as that option wasn't available for the laptop. Additionally, after Hermes not collecting the item on two consecutive times with the Hermes home pick-up option, I was advised by a customer service assistant to organize the return myself as there is no point in choosing the home pick-up service for the third time. Following his advice and returning the laptop myself being the only available option to send it back to Amazon, I have decided to organize the return myself. I was told that I can use any of the shipping services. To quote I was told: "I could only find the pickup option. So you could arrange your own return using parcel monkey: www.parcelmonkey.com or any similar service. Keep the receipt and send it to: ...url... And we will refund you the postage fees". I didn't get any other instructions and I did what I was told by the assistant to the letter.  What else should I add? Should I mention anything else?   I understand that. I am not afraid of that, I do think that nothing protects them from having to compensate a consumer where they have failed to take reasonable care in performing the contracted service. They have a general duty of care, and they have also failed to provide the service paid for. I really hope that the judge sees it that way too. But maybe Amazon realize the mistake they made and I won't have to sue Hermes. To be honest I think it is disgusting what they do... There is no way to lose a package of 70X40X15. It is way too big. And what are the chances that they lose another package of mine that I send with the laptop at the same time? Obviously someone stole them. What else could have happened? How can they not find the driver who was responsible for the package at the time of moving it from the ParcelShop to the sorting warehouse? And if something happened to the car/driver, it must be logged somewhere. And I would like to see that log (I actually asked them to provide that in my last letter). The whole thing is just unbeliavable.
    • if other details match and this is as a result of say a marriage then yes. CCJ's are not against an address.    
    • Thanks DX and BN.   He did keep saying he’s done loads of parking cases in the past, over the 10 years he’d been doing it, so as you say he’s bound to have come across VCS stuff before isn’t he.   hopefully that’s the case then he just wants to go through it in a bit more detail. Either way you have given me a lot more confidence again now thanks.
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4058 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Equita were passed my council tax arrears. They have added almost £184 to the debt of £300. The bailiff would had to have called at my property at least 6 times for those fees to have been incurred and I know he has not. I have paid £126 to Equita and have since been paying the Council direct as I wrote to Equita in May asking for a breakdown of their fees and informing them I would pay the council until they complied with the request. I told the council I was doing this and why. I had no response other than a visit from the bailiff a week ago telling me he was coming back with a van. I wrote to Equita by return with a copy of my letter of 28 May reiterating that I want a breakdown of their costs and that I would continue to pay the council whilst I wait for them to comply. I got a letter from the yesterday saying the bailiff will be turning up this week with the van and will take my goods whether or not I let them in. I won't let them in and I haven't signed a walking possession notice and all my windows and doors will be locked. I am about to call them today to remind them that it is a legal requirement that they provide the breakdown of costs within 14 days and that I will continue to pay the council as they are in breach of their legal requirement. Will contact council and complain about Equita while I am at it.

I take it as long as I pay the council direct and Equita are in breach of their requirement to give me a breakdown they can't do much about it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You MUST pursue this and the local authority are obliged to demand that THEIR AGENT provides this information !!


It would appear that YET AGAIN Equita have applied an "enforcement fee" to your account and on first glance this would appear to be for £160. It is simply staggering the amount of cases where this is happening.


The purpose of a bailiff visit is the "levy upon goods" and a bailiff can charge a fee of £24.50 for "attending to levy where no levy takes place" (ie: where nobody was at home when he called). He may apply a 2nd such visit fee of £18.00 if a further visit is required and the charge for this can ONLY be £18.00.


UNLESS the bailiff has either been into your premises and levied upon goods indoors which he will record on a Walking Possession or he has levied upon goods outside (ie: a motor vehicle) then he CANNOT CHARGE ANY FURTHER AMOUNTS.


The Statutory Regulations DO NOT provide for a bailiff to be able to charge an "enforcement fee" . In reality this charge is really an "attending to remove" fee!!


The regulations provide that such a charge can ONLY be applied if a bailiff has PREVIOUSLY levied upon goods. If this is the case then the bailiff by law must have provided documentary evidence of such a levy.


You need to request a copy of the SCREEN SHOT of your account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi can I ask has a bailiff ever been in your home also what area do you live in im sure you are aware if no bailiff has ever been in your property and has not levied on a car outside then all they can charge is first and second visit fee witch amounts to £42.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tomtubby and bailiffbasher69. Just put the phone down on Equita. Firstly they said I had to speak to the bailiff which I refused to do because I found him too aggressive and intimidating when I asked him for a breakdown of costs. I told them I have written to them twice for this breakdown and reminded them that I was aware of what they could legally charge me. Spoke to someone else who said that they had received the second letter request yesterday but not the first one which of course they had. I have been visited 3 times that I am aware of and at no time was entry gained nor did I sign anything and I do not have a car so a levy could not be made. Therefore the fees for 3 visits should be £60 although I believe that one of these visits was unnecessary. I have been told the breakdown of charges will be sent out to me so I look forward to receiving this. I have no argument about paying the outstanding council tax but there is no way I am paying excessive and unfair charges. I live in Northamptonshire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Therefore the fees for 3 visits should be £60

bailiffs collecting council tax can only charge for 2 visits no matter how many times the come to your house


£24.50 1st visit £18 2nd visit because they have no levy your total for bailiffs fees should be £42.50

Link to post
Share on other sites



As you do not own a vehicle the bailiff cannot of levied upon your goods and therefore the ONLY charges that can have been applied are £24.50 for "attending to levy where no levy was made" and a further charge of £18.00 can be applied for the second visit. There is NO provision within the statutory fee scale laid down by Parliament for any other visit fees to be applied UNLESS a bailiff has previosuly levied upon goods.


Please do ensure that you post back here with any repsonse that you receive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I will post back here as soon as I have had their response which they assure me will be within the next couple of days. Thanks to you all for your advice and support.

Link to post
Share on other sites



I promised that I would post back once I had heard from Equita with a breakdown of charges and I have now received this and guess what? my bill has miraculously shrunk. The opening balance was orginally according to Equita £586 but the breakdown shows the opening balance as £426 which is made up of £384 Council Tax arrears plus £24 plus £18. It then goes on to list the payments I have made and the outstanding balance. So the £160 levy charge you said you thought they had added even though no goods were levied was correct. Outrageous behaviour.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...