Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Loan signed month after funds released HSBC is this loan invalid? PLEASE HELP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can someone please help me, i was told back in 2005 that regardless of the faact that i only wanted to extend my overdraft by £50 my only option was to consolidate so i agreed a loan as i was backed into a corner with HSBC 22/09/05 and signed a very small document in the branch with no t & c's, the funds were released to me on 26/09/09 i then recieved a letter in the post with new t&c's and a new cca and was told that if i didn't sign the funds would be withdrawn (so of course i signed) fast forward 4 years later, i hear about unenforceable loan agreements so ask the bank for original signed agreement, the only record they have is a cca signed by me one month after the funds were released into my account, what options do i have could this potentially make the loan invalid and what should i do next as HSBC went into lock down when i pointed this out and passed it over to their legal department to "investigate" i have never missed a payment or tried to stop payments? I would really appreciate some advice, have been told i may get all money back and loan written off could this be true?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please help me, i was told back in 2005 that regardless of the faact that i only wanted to extend my overdraft by £50 my only option was to consolidate so i agreed a loan as i was backed into a corner with HSBC 22/09/05 and signed a very small document in the branch with no t & c's, the funds were released to me on 26/09/09 i then recieved a letter in the post with new t&c's and a new cca and was told that if i didn't sign the funds would be withdrawn (so of course i signed) fast forward 4 years later, i hear about unenforceable loan agreements so ask the bank for original signed agreement, the only record they have is a cca signed by me one month after the funds were released into my account, what options do i have could this potentially make the loan invalid and what should i do next as HSBC went into lock down when i pointed this out and passed it over to their legal department to "investigate" i have never missed a payment or tried to stop payments? I would really appreciate some advice, have been told i may get all money back and loan written off could this be true?

 

Hi Sarah,

 

I am going to play the role of the other sides defence at first. Sorry to have to do this but it is reality.

 

On this point.

i was told back in 2005 that regardless of the faact that i only wanted to extend my overdraft by £50 my only option was to consolidate so i agreed a loan as i was backed into a corner with HSBC 22/09/05 and signed a very small document in the branch with no t & c's,

 

Can you prove this in any way shape or form??

 

If HSBC does not have the original document you signed and you don't have a copy then there is no proof it ever existed in front of a Judge. I know that may sound harsh but looking at it objectively that would be the case sorry.

 

The best way forward I can see for you is getting a copy of the CCA that HSBC do have on record. Then take that and sit down with someone at the Citizens Advice Bureau.

 

Sorry it's not much help for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your reply, i cannot prove this as neither the bank or myself have a copy, however they released the funds to me on 26/09/05 which if they or myself cannot find the agreement, and the only ones they can find is one which was signed 1 month after the funds were released then it means they released a substantial amount into my account without me signing anything to agree to them doing so? surely this (under the terms of the consumer act at this time) was not correct practice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...