Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax Bailiffs levied on friends car in my drive while away. **RESOLVED COUNCIL REMOVED FEES AND ACCEPTED £25PCM**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

While I have been away, a bailiff has been to our home re council tax. The council tax bill is in my name.

 

I owe 347.65 and he has added 35 Levy Fee and 110 Attendance van fee.

 

He has left a Notice of Distress and address to me and All Others who it may concern.

 

He has left an Inventory which states my friends car (he left it here as we got a taxi from my house to the air port) and my wifes car. None of these are in my name.

 

It is Rossendales. The Inventory is obviously not signed by me but only the bailiff.

 

Where do I stand please ....

Edited by Isiris

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

You stand in good stead, I believe.

 

They can charge £26 for a first visit, and £18 for a second if they have not obtained a levy, if I understand it correctly.

 

If they are adding extras for stuff that doesn't belong to you etc etc, they can get lost. If they have levy'd incorrectly, and from what you say they have, the expenses are down to them and no one else.

 

There are loads of tricks they might try from here, so I would suggest getting in touch with your Local Authority.

 

THEY (the LA) ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BAILLIFS ACTIONS. They employ them, so they are responsible. If they employed me to do some plumbing in your house, they would be responsible if I messed it up (I am a salesman, so I would cock it up lol).

 

Speak to the Council, point out the errors in their levy's, the inappropriate charges, and see what they say.

 

Nothing you have said surprises me, but what they will try next is anyones guess - but it can be dealt with. Keep on at this place, and you should find the answers.

 

Essentiallly, I think you should make it your first priority to let the Council know they have levy'd on goods that don't belong to you and ask them how to proceed and/or instruct their sub-contractors to act in the correct, legal manner. You will get a load of rubbish back, but come and tell us the rubbish and deal with it from there.

 

You must offer them the opportunity to correct their mistakes. If they don't then it sounds to me like it is getting towards Form 4 time, which potentially invloves the Baillif losing his job (hold back the tears). But I think that is a long way off, and should be sorted long before then.

 

You need to force them (the Council, not their sub-contractors) to give you a legitimate balance, and then pay it or agree to pay it over a period of time that reflects your circumstances.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will be on the phone tomorrow

 

Just a sub note though, is my wife responsible for the debt or just me, as that is all the council tax has ever been in, my name

 

Thanks for the response as well

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think not. If it is in your name, it is down to you I think - I am fairly sure of that but please clarify with others.

 

Do not expect lots of help from the Council, they will give bland answers and dodge the question, but you must speak to them first.

 

Sleep well and come back tomorrow. This can be dealt with, just not in a few minutes, that's all. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only do an inventory if they have been given peaceful access, they cannot levy on your friends car, and you can prove that it is not yours.

 

The Council will advise you to contact the bailiffs as they have referred it on to them to deal with, but you can request a breakdown of the charges etc and what they are for, and also dispute in writing.

 

And if the council tax is in your name - you are the liable party.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff can only apply a levy to goods owned by the person named on the Laibility Order. However there is case law that provides that a bailiff can ASSUME that goods belong to you and the ONUS OF PROOF is on YOU and NOT the bailiff to prove otherwise.

 

You need to WRITE to Rossendales to advise them that the car is not yours and that a simple DVLA search will reveal this.

 

In addition the purpose of the visit was to levy upon goods....NOT to remove and therefore the bailiff should NOT be applying an "attending to remove" fee !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. Am I write in thinking though that he cant levy on anything if I am not there to sign the walking possesion?

 

I have done as you advised by PM too.

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done as you advised by PM too.
:eek:

In addition the purpose of the visit was to levy upon goods....NOT to remove and therefore the bailiff should NOT be applying an "attending to remove" fee !!

:) I like that!

 

Yep they are being unreasonable, you need to get your Council to see this and this should at least put them on the back foot while you address your situation.

 

I should be a bit more pro-active about mine to be honest! But I have been in Hospital, so will be getting a bit more active hence...

 

Keep us posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delayed update

 

Pointed out to the council that:-

1. the bailiff wasnt on the bailiffs register

2. that the goods were not mine

3. that the attendance van was not needed as their was no WP in place.

 

Amzingly, they have called off the bailiff, cancelled any fees and accepted 25 a month

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delayed update

 

Pointed out to the council that:-

1. the bailiff wasnt on the bailiffs register

2. that the goods were not mine

3. that the attendance van was not needed as their was no WP in place.

 

Amzingly, they have called off the bailiff, cancelled any fees and accepted 25 a month

 

well done to you:Dfighting back gives satisfaction dont you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Council Tax Bailiffs levied on friends car in my drive while away. **RESOLVED COUNCIL REMOVED FEES AND ACCEPTED £25PCM**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...