Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Southern Water £1,500 bill arrears....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

My partner moved into a two bedroom flat in October 2003.

The flat is small and the second bedroom is tiny (big enough for his 8 year old when he comes to visit but no good for an adult).

 

The flat is in a block of 9 and was a new build at the time of him moving in.

 

In 2006 we received a bill for £1,500 + from Southern Water.

 

We're now paying £70 a month on these bills and have the balance down now to £700 (as every 3 months we get a further £130 bill or thereabouts).

 

When we received the bill, we asked the water company to check the bill and they supposedly checked the pipes for leaks and and then they checked in the flat. The water man said that there was water leaking down the back of the cistern and over a period of time would account for the level of water usage.

 

A statement from Aug 2007 states that Southern Water introduced a new billing system and they transferred our previous balance to the new statement. We have no statements prior to this.

 

My issues / queries are:-

 

1) We never received a water bill for the first few years of living at this address? Is this not the problem of the water company and not ours?

 

2) our water is metered, the meter being out by the road in a manhole cover that we cannot access and have not been able to see any water readings. how do we know that the water from our meter, was not used by the builders for mixing cement etc.

 

3) the water and other utility companies have a habit of putting people on payment plans and threatening court action for non payment of bills etc - can they really do this (can we question this) if we do not have visibility of the meter and never have..?

 

does anyone know how to tackle this?

Is £130 for 3 months around the national average for a tiny flat? the toilet has no leaks and we do around 3 loads of washing a week. Hardly the biggest users! we shower and turn the tap off when we clean our teeth! we're pretty careful and I can't help but feel that we're being fleeced a bit by Southern Water.

 

Is there a letter template out there I could use? I guess I still want to have all readings from date of moving in to present day.... but I want to tackle specifically the years of no bills and then where the £1500 bill came about (& proof of this)

 

Thanks for any help you can give!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah - interesting.

 

So should I contact with OFWAT do you think? Do they have any power over the water companies or are they a cotton wool organisation that say how things should be, but don't enforce it?

 

Can you send me any further details on where I can find out more about this backdated billing statement from OFWAT?

 

Thank you

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do an internet search on billing code, contact Ofwat or the Campaign for Water Justice, they will give you details of both the billing code and court precedents where it has been enforced against water companies. From my experience, both Ofwat and the Consumer Council for Water are of no use and have no interest in individual problems with the water companies, usually referring the compaint back to the water company to be dealt with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

When we received the bill, we asked the water company to check the bill and they supposedly checked the pipes for leaks and and then they checked in the flat. The water man said that there was water leaking down the back of the cistern and over a period of time would account for the level of water usage.

 

Sounds like rubbish to me. If you had water running down the back of the cistern, wouldn't you have noticed wet floors if this was the case?

 

does anyone know how to tackle this?

Is £130 for 3 months around the national average for a tiny flat? the toilet has no leaks and we do around 3 loads of washing a week. Hardly the biggest users! we shower and turn the tap off when we clean our teeth! we're pretty careful and I can't help but feel that we're being fleeced a bit by Southern Water.

 

I'm with Southern Water & ok unmetered but we have an average-sized 2-bed house, washine machine on nearly every day, dishwasher at least once a day & 3 of us showering every day (in my son's case sometimes twice a day!) as well as toilet flushing, kettle filling etc & my water bill is £28.73 per month so I would say that £130 for 3 months is high for your situation.

 

In my business, I was sent what I felt was a disproportionatly high bill so I rang SW & insisted that they send someone to check the meter cos it was outside & we didn't even know where it was so we couldn't check it even if we wanted to. Had to be very insistant though & when they did come, lo & behold, we were being charged for the shop as well as the 3-bed flat above it that has nothing whatsoever to do with us so I would email them rather than get fobbed off by ringing & request an engineer comes to check the meter & make sure you're there when he comes so that you can see how to access it in future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The Billing Code does not apply to water -only for gas and electricity.

 

You or your partner need to do some checking.

 

Was the meter fitted when he/you moved in. It is not uncommon for water companies to fit meters in retrospect ( it happened in my newbuilt apartment) and then make an estimate of usage prior to the meter fitting that is very much in their favour. (they asked us for £80 more than was reasonable)

 

Has he checked that the meter he thinks is his is actually connected to his flat. It is perfectly possible that the meter said to be his is in fact connected to a larger flat with very high usage. 'Our' meter was supplying another flat.

 

Are there nine meters outside ?! There have been cases where a meter is supplying two or more flats.

 

Utility companies in general bill when they have received a meter reading either from the customer or a meter reader. The fact that they have not sent a bill suggests that they have not read the meter either. They must read it at at least 18 monthly intervals so you can use this as a reason for not paying more than 18 month back.

 

Usually with newbuilds the fault lies between the water company and the builder - the fact that the builder/agent has sold the property on has not been adequately passed on to the water company or the water company has not (if at all!) entered the property correctly in their database. It is almost inconceivable that water was not used in the flat during the selling process by builders,agents and veiwers so do not accept a start meter reading of 0. Argue the point. If they are using 0 ask them when the meter was fitted and compare this to the date your partner moved in.

 

I live in a two bedded apartment with my wife and our yearly bill on a water meter is £270. We wash clothes more often than you do and there are two in the apartment so our toilet and bathing usage will be similar

 

A leak anywhere in your sytem would have to be massive to nearly double your bill and you would very definitely notice it!

 

Note that many utilities are at present having a blitz on their databases in order to drum up cash in hard times. It is quite possible that when they do not have full informaqtion they guess and as most people pay up without checking they get away with it. Check everything and require proof. You will be surprised how quickly they cave in particularly if they know you will complan to the Ombudsman if they do not satisfy you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone.

 

I've written a letter to Southern Water and will send it tomorrow. It's basically asking them to give me a breakdown of all meter readings. It's also requested confirmation on when the meter was fitted, where the meter is connected to - to get them to check that the water meter belongs to our property.

 

I also asked why we did not receive a bill for a few years of living here and that we've paid hundreds to them for a supposed debt, that we have no proof that we owe.

 

I'll take this all the way. Lets see what happens!

 

Thanks for all your help

 

Twinkle

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello everyone

 

Had some success!

Wrote to Southern Water - I stated:

 

We pay £70 a month on water due to not receiving a bill for the first 3 years in the property.

When we received the bill we queried it with southern water but they simply put it down to a leak down the back of the cistern - which we dispute would have been noticed by us if it was bad and we didn't believe accounted for the level of water usage.

That in Aug 2007 they introduced a new billing system & we have no statements prior to this.

 

I then requested:

 

1) why did we never receive a bill for the first few years of living at this address?

2) our water is metered & the meter being out in the road, under a manhole cover that we cannot access & we have never seen any water readings - wanted to know when the water meter was fitted for this date

3) that i was unhappy that as a result of not receiving any statements for years, that we found ourselves in a supposed debt to them and put on a payment plan

4) i had researched and found that our bills were way to high in my opinion for a 3 washes per week and no dishwasher household.

 

Long and short of the matter is - they have shaved off £400 off our bill - which is the outstanding amount from the supposed debt and have offered for the next time a meter reading is taken for us to be present. They do not know how many meters are outside our property and they did send us a statement from 2006 to 2009.

 

Couple of things that I will raise another time (fancy a little break from it and need to research it some more) is that charges from Apr 05 to Mar 06 amounts to £1000 and Apr 06 to Mar 07 comes in at £500. Think they're trying to pull the wool over our eyes, but for the time being, we don't owe Southern Water anything.

 

So - partial success. :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

The utilities have a habit of refunding for water used but not refunding the VAT levied. Check this.

 

They clearly have agreed that there is fault on their side. £400 does not appear to be a great success in these circumstances. Push them for a full account (with readings) from the day you moved in - they must prove the amount they have said you owed them for the first three years and subsequent bills. Ask them to show you how they reached a figure of £400 rebate.

 

Be obsessive and you may well find they owe you a great deal! - and that the £400 is the sum that they think will keep you quiet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Twinkle, well done on your result with southern water, that is really fantastic.

You have inspired me to complain to them about my water bill.

When i have queried things with them before they refer us to South East Water as that is who they say takes the meter readings???

Have they said this to you before ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...