Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax Benefit Visits


Trudy B
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Apparently the council want to come along and visit me instead of sending a renewal form for my council tax benefit. Lucky old me!

 

However, I do not want strange people in my house (and especially not men) and it is not a council house or rented. It is a private property.

 

Do I have to agree to this and does anyone know what legislation says I do?

 

I have no problem sending info, I do not want strange people snooping round my house!

 

I have no idea what my rights are here.

 

Any ideas????

 

T :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea of the regulations, but someone will no doubt come along soon and let you know, all I do know is a friend of mine had this visit to her own home, ie, not rented or council, it was the verification officer, so if yours is that then they are entitled to "verify"! They probably just want to make sure what you are declaring is true and there are no issues they should be aware of.

 

If you are vulnerable, can you ask someone to be there with you to help/witness what goes on?

 

Good kuck.

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JQ

 

Sorry, perhaps I phrased that all wrongly.

 

I have no problem sending them accounts, bank statements, documents etc for income verifcation / council tax benefit renewal purposes ..... what I do not want grubby council people snooping round my house!

 

The tone and attitude of their letter, all fait au compli, all "this is what we are doing, you make sure you are in and waiting for 3 1/2 hours", is not acceptable.

 

Therefore I am trying to find out what my rights are and what rights of entry they have etc etc.

 

T :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trudy

 

Are you working or do they expect you to be there? I am sure if you closed all doors and took whoever arrives straight to one room, they would not have the opportunity to snoop.

 

I believe the laws have changed but, over 12 years ago I had the same issue, but they turned up unannounced, I was just leaving for the school run. They demanded that I let them in. I refused due to school run, they then said they had called before and I was not in, and why not? I wasn't working so why wasn't I in? We all know that when we are not working, we have nothing better to do than sit on our bums and do nothing, don't we?

 

In fact, I was running a charity, and helping several disadvanteged people deal with various things that they would otherwise be unable to deal with, as well as doing some business deals for a friend who was not capable herself (gratis), caring for my brother who is a mental health patient and packing up my mum's house because she had just died due to negligent mis-diagnosis! The council officer did come back and insisted that they go in every room, including the bathroom to check how many toothbrushes there were etc (I was a lone parent) and I was mortified. I had bags and boxes of stuff piled everywhere from my mum's, we could hardly move! I was so embarrassed and she treated me appallingly. I was already distraught at having lost my mum, I had to keep up with everything I had undertaken prior to that and now I was being treated like a ****** council tax benefit cheat!! I did complain and nothing happened. So, I can sympathise, but I hope with the Human Rights Act giving one the right to quiet enjoyment of one's home and family etc, that it is better now! After all, we are innocent until proven guilty and I had done nothing wrong!

 

Have a look on "useful links" thread it may have some gov't legislation that you can read.

 

I wish you well.

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends what you signed to in agreement when you completed the application form.

 

I know the application forms here have a phrase in the declaration along the lines of "This is my application for council tax benefit. I declare the information I have given is correct and complete" it goes on about understanding the right to preosecute if the information is false and then there is another paragraph which states that you agree to council employees visiting your home to verify your claim.

 

If you have signed to it, then they can some. But aside from that, with any claim to benefit, if a claimant refuses to comply with "reasonable request" then benefit can be suspended, sanctioned or terminated, so in view of that I would be careful about refusal.

 

Sometimes it is to look for signs of fraud - for example with a single person claim, to look for signs of a partner living there.

 

I am single but don't claim benefit however I often wonder what would happen if I did and they visited my home. My father is getting on a bit and my mum has severe alcoholism, and obvious mental health issues (undiagnosed as she refuses to seek help but isn't bad enough to be sectioned). Sometimes my dad will come here (I live away from family) whilst my brothers look in on my mother, just so he can get some respite for a weekend. It's only about once every few months but he has his razors and toothbrush and his other bits and bobs here, though no clothes as yet.

Edited by ErikaPNP

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had visits to verify my details have not changed for a number of years now. The lady asks to check your latest bank statement and the latest letter from DWP to state that you are still claiming benefits and then asks you to sign to state this is true.

 

At no time have they 'snooped around my home. They have always been extremely polite and respectful towards me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends what you signed to in agreement when you completed the application form.

 

I disagree; entitlement is set by legislation not by contract law. They have no power to set additional conditions.

 

They do have the power to investigate claims and can draw an adverse inference and in some case to terminate benefit if information requested is not provided. In this commissioner's decision the power is discussed from paragraph 45 onwards and it is clear that there must be a genuine doubt over entitlement, or a reaonable need for the information.

 

However I also agree with Jailbird that these visits are nothing to worry about and they don't snoop.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Quick update here

 

Complete utter and total waste of time and space. Yes, it was nothing more than a fishing expedition to snoop round my house.

 

So they came round and I gave them all the info they asked for – I even photocopied it for them. Then I got their life story and although they had only ever worked for the council and only for a few years, with no degrees or professional qualification may I please add, they then started trying to dole out careers advice!

 

Off they go then they write back with more stupid questions, want more info and looks like they have made a whole host of wholly unjustified and unverified assumptions, all in their favour of course, and now want me to cough up money when I know full well that my income levels are below that which are needed to be entitled to full benefits.

 

I went through all of this hassle last year and here we go again!

 

Have asked them for shed loads of documents and information under Freedom of Information and also Data Protection Act – guess what – not so forthcoming – zero reply!

 

So instead of trying to help people, especially those in financial difficulty in this recession, it seems they are targeted on whom they can get away with bullying and getting money out of and not helping you and treat everyone like some benefits cheat.

 

Not happy.

 

T :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it's tempting to perceive that you're being singled out, but I think they do visit everyone. It's all very well saying just target the fraudsters, but how are they supposed to find out who that is except by checking claims?

 

Can you be a bit more specific about what they have got wrong? If you provided specific inforamtion about your circumstances there should not be any assumptions to make.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zamzara

 

They don't target fraudsters, they treat everyone as benefit cheats and you have to prove otherwise or they get the bailiffs in!

 

Well exactly. That's my point. They have made various very incorrect assumptions regrding my income and have totally disregarded my accounts which include the business expenses. I went through all my bank statements and income and everything with the person they sent. Complete and utter waste of time.

 

It also looks like they are also trying to treat the money my mum gives me so that i can actually survive as income and my brithday money and I have had this checked and no way can it be classed as earned income or benefits - i get working tax credit.

 

I went all through this hassel last year and in the end it turns out that what they forced me to pay I was not due to and they had to give me a refund plus full benefits. It only got sorted cos i made a massive complaint when they sent the bailiffs letters etc.

 

Funny they demand this and that and the other but when you ask for copies of thier calculations and assumtions and various other awkard information under Data protection and Freedom of Information they go very very quiet!

 

They can't say they have not had my letter and thus info requests cos they returned the original documentation I sent them with proof of stuff they have asked for.

 

T :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The correct course of action is to appeal to a tribunal, not wait until they send bailiffs and then complain. If you don't appeal it's then very difficult to get the decision changed later, which I fully admit is not ideal. Unfortunately due to the messed up council tax system you always have an underlying obligation to pay, and claim back via CTB .

 

Generally most income is counted apart from some types of benefit, but charitable and voluntary income should be disregarded and you could argue that money paid from family to help you out fits this category.

 

There is no need to claim under data protection, as when you appeal they include all this information in the submission. The problem is you seem to be using the complaints system instead of appealing.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zamzara

 

This year I have not got to any of those stages yet - they came round and got all the info they requested, they made whatever assumptions they did and sent a new assessment asking for money

 

With this new assessment the letter also said

a) please send us more info, they did a list. I sent this all to them and they have returned the originals.

b) if you don't agree with the figures let us know.

 

Therefore I sent the info above and I said no their assessment was wrong and here's the info to justify it.

 

Due to the hell they put me through last year I also requested various info and details of their asessment and calculations in advance.

 

Not a peep since.

 

If I request info I am entitled to under Data Protection Act there is zero reason why they should not supply it or are they above and exempt form this Act? I want that info now becasue i want to know what the hell they are up to and that's no way unreasonable.

 

Why should they wish to withhold information requsts regarding generic information under the Freedom of Information Act? What are they hiding here then?

 

What reason would they withhold information regarding calculations, assessments and assumptions if they are so sure they are correct?

 

Money from my mum and other help from my family is defo not income. If I earned enough income they would not have to send me charity money. It is a gift not income.

 

Anyhow, looks like I need to send them a polite reminder!

 

T :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to be pedantic for the sake of it, but I fear if you tell them it's not income it will confuse their limited minds as there is no provision for money you get to not be income; it's either income from earnings or income not from earnings.

 

However, some income is disregarded under Schedule 5 of the regulations, and you can definitely argue that a gift is voluntary income and therefore should be disregarded.

 

And the information about the decision should definitely be included with the decision, and at any appeal stage. And you can request general inforamtion under freedom of information as long as no exemption applies.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zamzara

 

Great - That's very handy, I would very much like to read all about that - how do I get the information about the rules and regs Schedule 5?

 

Are there any links you can help me out with perhaps or is it available on the web or do I also need to write to them and ask them for this information too?

 

T :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original is here:

 

The Housing Benefit Regulations 2006

 

I can't find a version as amended, but the main change to the issue in question is that child benefit is now also disregarded.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trudy B

 

Just a wee note, you could try getting hold of a copy of the Welfare Benefits and Tax Credits Handbook! It is from CPAG (Child Poverty Action Group), it should be in the local reference library and it has a telephone number in it where you can order a copy. Benefit claimants get it at a reduced rate of approx £8-9.00? It has lots of useful information, especially on earnings disregards! Also, if you feel you can't afford it, then if you get a member of your family to pay for it directly for you, it will be a third party payment and not a receipt of income!!

 

Good luck!

 

JQ

Edited by jqinfo
Spelling! Doh!
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...