Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft full postal address???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5312 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Also try 192.com. Normally will have the "real address" listed.

I now use email most of the time, as my correspndence now is telling them to get lost and complaining about harrassment! I Normally copy to the OFT as well. (Use the cc box)

Seems to do the trick most of the time. The emails/letters from DCA'S then mostly change tone, to almost apologetic and then they go quiet.

Very rarely get any post anymore. When they know everything is being copied to the OFT.

Oh should say I found Moorcroft very easily despatched. They just rolled over and didn't want to play!

If only i'd found this site 3 4 years ago my debts would be 3 years closer to being statute barred.

Until I found this site I really was considering Bankruptcy or an IVA as I could see no other way out.

 

If only the so called debt consellors gave you the real answer which should be check the debt is legally enforceable before doing anything else.

Edited by jon888999
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone!

 

The reason why I am writing to Moorcroft is they have sent me a letter for an allege debt of £576.32. To cut a long story short I took Virgin Media to court last week and won. The District Judge (very nice man) agreed that the Defendant will discontinue the telephone and broadband and TV box services i.e total cancellation of contract between myself and VM with immediate effect. The defendant agrees to write off the remaining balance due from the Claimant (that's me). My court date was 25 Aug 09 and the letter from Moorcroft is dated 27 Aug 09 (oh dear) so now I am also emailing legal affairs at VM to ask why they have instructed Moorcroft to chase a written off debt.

 

As we all know on here letters from debt agencies are all the same threatening warrant of execution, application for attachment of earnings and application for a charging order on property blah bloody blah. So I have written a lovely letter to Moorcroft enclosing my letter from Court telling them to bog off, there is no debt end of........

Edited by idon'towemoney
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone!

 

The reason why I am writing to Moorcroft is they have sent me a letter for an allege debt of £576.32. To cut a long story short I took Virgin Media to court last week and won. The District Judge (very nice man) agreed that the Defendant will discontinue the telephone and broadband and TV box services i.e total cancellation of contract between myself and VM with immediate effect. The defendant agrees to write off the remaining balance due from the Claimant (that's me). My court date was 25 Aug 09 and the letter from Moorcroft is dated 27 Aug 09 (oh dear) so now I am also emailing legal affairs at VM to ask why they have instructed Moorcroft to chase a written off debt.

 

As we all know on here letters from debt agencies are all the same threatening warrant of execution, application for attachment of earnings and application for a charging order on property blah bloody blah. So I have written a lovely letter to Moorcroft enclosing my letter from Court telling them to bog off, there is no debt end of........

Probably just a last try before they get the Written directions from the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes babybear I was also wondering that. Well the letter I have written is a very strong worded letter so that should make them crawl back under their stone, but ultimately no DCA can ever chase this written off debt unless they want to take the law into their own hands and go against a judge's decision and luckily I have the Courts confirmation letter outlining the outcome of last weeks case.

Edited by idon'towemoney
spelling mistake
Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received a lovely yellow envelope from Moorcroft from their Pr-Court Division with a notice of intended Litigation putting charges on a written off debt with VM. They have put extra charges for Solicitors cost at £70, Court Fees £70 and another Solicitors costs for entering Judgement £25 (they really are a joke)

 

I know everybody on here advises not to call them but I had to (for a laugh), well I was very surprised by their response I was expected to be bullied on the phone (had my fisty cuffs ready) and I was dissapointed indeed. The lady I spoke to asked for my ref no then for my address and then asked me my DOB I said "no not giving you that" then she said can i have your telephone no, I said "no not giving you that" then I proceed to tell her about the letter I wrote with the confirmation from the courts and she said we have put your account on hold while we investigate so I said "i do not have an account with you" and if i hear from you again I will be the one taking you to court and she said "ok then and hung up".......well that was easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was tempted to, but you know when you have one up on them i just wanted to exercise my authority over them knowing full well they cannot override a judges decision.

 

I must admit this site is so informative and has helped me a great deal, so when you know your rights you can't help but bait with them a little.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was tempted to, but you know when you have one up on them i just wanted to exercise my authority over them knowing full well they cannot override a judges decision.

 

I must admit this site is so informative and has helped me a great deal, so when you know your rights you can't help but bait with them a little.

 

It's becoming a little hobby of mine..winding them up and then trying to get them wound up for good :D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Today I receive another letter from Moorcroft (notice of intended Litigation, i'm scared) saying that I owe £372.16, where on earth do they get there figures from?

 

I have written to them saying that I can prove I don't owe them money, sent the relevant docs and yes, go on take me to court as I have no problem taking on a multinational company like Virgin Media and winning.

 

Moorcroft are a bunch off idiots!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh tell me about it, theyve done similar to me. i finally sent them a recorded letter of complaint pointing out what laws they are breaking (with help from the people of CAG). I received a letter back informing me they are investigating and sent me a copy of their official complaints procedure..

 

they really are dim at Moorcroft

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...