Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard/Mercers shambles


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm new to this site so try to be patient if I seem a bit dim!

 

I was made redundant a few months ago and contacted the Consumer Credit Counselling Service for debt management advice. They gave me template letters to send all of my unsecured creditors all of whom have accepted the terms offered except Barclaycard.

 

I have 2 Barclaycards -one origionally was from Morgan Stanley -which have now passed to Mercers. After numerous phone calls I eventually received a letter from mercers accepting the repayment plan for one of my cards and a separate letter stating that they are taking further action on the other card.

 

I phoned Mercers and was told that the first letter was a mistake and the plan is not acceptable for both accounts. The firm is a complete shambles.

 

I am now thinking that I should see if the CCa's are unenforcable. Is there a standard letter I could send? Do I send it to Mercers, Barclaycard or both?

 

I've been reading posts here for the last 3 hours but am still confused!

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter to Mercers recorded delivery including a £1 postal order & do not sign the request.

 

It would be worthwhile sending it to all your creditors (except overdrafts) to see whether all the agreements are indeed enforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site-will move your thread.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

CCA request letters sent.

 

I also sent a letter asking that all future communication be in writing and that I will not respond to any other form. i.e. telephone text etc. However I am still getting phone calls and threatening texts.

 

The Mercers half wit who called me also claims that credit cards do not require a CCA!

 

Clearly I will not get a copy of the origional CCA. So what is the next step?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also sent a letter asking that all future communication be in writing and that I will not respond to any other form. i.e. telephone text etc. However I am still getting phone calls and threatening texts.

 

Make a complaint to Ofcom Ofcom

And get a copy of Sharklaycards complaints procedure and use it to it's entirety, also consider reporting them to the Police (not 999) for their continued harassment and threats.

 

I would also consider making a complaint to the OFT The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send it to whoever is pursuing you now for money. With regard to the 'phone calls send this;

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Harassment by telephone

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only. [if you Want Them to]

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

Yours faithfully, **Print name do not sign**

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing. let us know if they send anything

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now received the T&C's from BC. with a covering letter stating that

"a copy of your current Credit Agreement will be sent under separate cover" and that they have completed their obligation to me. No signed CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now received the T&C's from BC. with a covering letter stating that

"a copy of your current Credit Agreement will be sent under separate cover" and that they have completed their obligation to me. No signed CCA.

 

Fantastic evidence for court, shooting themselves in the foot!

 

Wait and see what else they might send, account is still in dispute, pay them nowt, up and until they can provide proof of an enforceabe CCA..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have just received a letter from Barclaycard which is a mixture of responses to 2 seperate letters. One was a letter about harrassment by phone, the other a request for a copy of CCA.

 

Barclaycard mention something about minimum payments and that my offer of £5.00 per month is unacceptable (I have never offered £5.00 per month)

 

The letter also says:

"Barclaycard's legal requirement under section 78 of the consumer credit act is to provide your with a copy of your executed agreement along with a statement of your account. This information was provided on the 24th Sept 2009 for both accounts. Therefore we have fulfilled our legal requirements under section 78 and will continue to pursue you for this debt until a suitable agreement has been reached."

 

It then goes on to say I can complain to the financial ombudsman etc. etc.

 

1. All I have received is a copy of T&C's. No statement.

 

What next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've now received a letter from a company called Debt Managers ltd. which states:

 

"Barclaycard has informed us that you have not complied with the default notice recently sent to you. The balance ststed above is now due in full and Barclaycard demands that you pay this amount immediately.

 

Statements will no longer be sent to you and interest will be charged on the oustanding balance at 1% per month.

 

It is Barclaycards policy to pass information on to licensed Credit Reference Agencies when we send you a formal Demand and you donot repay the amount asked for. This may affect your ability to get credit from other lenders..."

 

Should I send a copy of the account in dispute leter to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tried to post a scan of the letter I received from BC but can't seem to manage it. I've looked in FAQ's but I'm still clueless. Am I being really dim? How do I insert a scan?

 

Also I don't think I've received a default notice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Mercers ARE Sharklay card!

 

George, have you tried Photobucket or Tinypic just log into either one create an account, scan your docs using either, then you will have a series of codes that you can link or attach to your post..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...