Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

looks like welcome have done it again.


screwedbywfs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5345 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello CAG,

 

I have been reading the forum a little with particular interest in welcome and increasingly I think that I have been screwed by these cowboys.

 

in 06 I originally went to carcraft in Sheffield and purchased a car for £5k (financed by 'you know who'), I took out all the insurances as the oh-so-helpful salesman from Ucan said that I would get a better rate of interest if I took them out and pretty much refused to remove PPI from the agreement.

 

I then took out a personal loan for £1000, this time i can't remember which, if any, insurance i took out. in 08 I was struggling to make repayments due to work issues (incidentally not covered by PPI for the car) and continued to scrape payments for the car but stopped paying the personal loan, they then sent both accounts to their collections dept who then began to make threats that they would have to reposess the car even though the car loan was up to date they said that both accfounts were 'linked' and that if one went into arears it affected both. So I ended up making payment on the loan to bring that more up to date at the expense of allowing the car to slip into arrears. they then started to hound me about this so I said I wanted to VT the car loan.

 

I spoke to someone at their office who said I should write with my intent to voluntarily terminate the car loan (i had paid just short of half of the payments) so I did and arranged somewhere for the car to be stored as it would be out of tax. after a couple of weeks i called to ask if the vt had been accepted and when would they be collecting the car, told it had been accepted but could take a month before they could collect. after 5 weeks i called again saying that the person keeping the car wanted rid of it as it was getting in the way so could they collect asap.... response? VT has NOT been accepted as you have arrears! but we can repossess it at a cost of £1200 if you do not want it anymore!!!

 

obviously this was not acceptable so was forced to get the car back on the road to help me find a new job. during this period i had still been struggling to find the money to make full payments so they offered to re-write both the personal loan and the car loan. result? paid over half of the £5k loan on my car and then re-wrote it so now I owe £8k on a 8 year old car and have a further 9 years left to pay for it. again I had paid almost half of my personal loan for 1000 and a year after re-write i owe 2195 with 9 years left to pay it.

 

with regard to the personal loan I am paying about £10 off the capital cum of 2195 and £20 in interest each month!!! they said, when i questioned their statement, that the interest i pay each month will decrease until about half way through the contract when i will be then paying the capital sum completely, doesn't sound 100%.

 

The big thing is, when I went to welcomes office to rewrite the loans I was paying attention to everything I was signing and am sure that all i signed was an application for credit and not an actual cca.

 

furthermore my new car loan does not show on experian although the old loan is showing as satisfied but on my cars HPI report there are 2 hp agreements showing as having an interest in the vehicle!

 

Can anyone suggest a course of action to sort all this rubbish out, where do I stand on these silly rewrites that I could definately have done without. I was more or less forced into rewriting even though I told them i would be able to start making payments again the following month.

 

anyway, apologies for war an peace :-) this is my first post so i thought i would make it count! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Screwed And Welcome

 

Excuse The Pun

 

You Are Among Friends With This Lot

 

What You Would Have Signe Is An Agreement To Modify The First Loan

 

I Say Should Have Signed For Good Reason

 

You Need To Send Welcome A Cca Request, That Will Cost A Quid FOR THE AGREEMENT And An Sar Request

That Will Cost A Tenner

 

They Have To Give You These By Law

 

When We Have These It Will Be Pay Back Time

 

Read The Welcome Thread In Depth

 

Ime Allways On Them And Know Exactly How The Con Works

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should work for yourself as a financial adviser, postggj!!!

 

I want one of cag's legal experts to look into the next big issue. The big issue of contracts like; BT who are allowed to put you on an 18 month contract, you dont pay the bill so they cut you off but still get to charge you for the remaining term of the contract or issue you with a one off charge for early cancellation.

 

to me that is wrong as if they are allowed to have the money for the contract you should be allowed to keep the service. otherwise they get money for nothing, what do we think

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Postggj,

 

Where can I find templates for SAR and CCA request?

 

I have read the welcome thread, (not wholly but i spent a good couple of hours getting the gist of it!) what a read, i want to get sorted before they fall apart completely which i suppose could make things a bit more difficult!

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is the SAR:

 

WELCOME FINANCE LIMITED

KINGSTON HOUSE

CENTRE 27 BUSINESS PARK

WOODHEAD ROAD, BIRSTALL BATLEY

WEST YORKSHIRE

WF17 9TD

 

31/08/2009

 

Data Protection Act disclosure request

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Reference Accounts

 

Formal Request under the Data Protection Act 1984 and 1998, and including the Right of Subject Access

 

I understand that you currently hold details of my personal and financial information within your internal record systems with regards to my Hire Purchase Agreements with your company. I have had 3 agreements with welcome finance Account Nos:*******(your account number or numbers)

 

Please supply me with complete details of all data held by yourselves, in regards to myself within your organization, including, but not limited to:

 

1. Full copies of all contracts that you believe exist or have existed between myself and your organization (the organisations), including true copies of any documents you hold in support of the same.

2. A complete list of all transactions or statements relating to ALL accounts with your organization.

3. Copies of all documents which include any of my personal information including copies of any contracts or invoices, emails or computer records containing my personal information, or any records which pertain to this information.

4. Full copies or transcripts of any computer logs or database records kept in relation to me or in relation to my personal and financial information.

5. Full copies of any and all correspondence in postal, email or any other format that you have entered into with any individual, organization or third party which contains my personal and financial information, or which pertains to me.

6. Where any previous information or records held have been deleted or disposed of, the methods used to do so, including dates, certificates or references confirming details of destruction. Where you are unable to provide such certificates, please provide a declaration, signed by an authorized officer of your company, confirming the dates and methods of destruction of this data

7. Full hard copy print outs of any of my personal and financial information held in a digital, magnetic or any other format which is held in any archives, backups or other storage devices / locations.

8. Please note that information for all of my addresses is required, to clarify these addresses are(your address / addresses)

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10.00 to access ALL data held by Welcome Finance Ltd about myself.

 

You should be fully aware of your statutory obligations under the Data Protection Act and that any failure to comply with this request could result in an investigation by the Information Commissioners Office. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If you are unable to deal with this request, you should immediately forward it to the person within your organization responsible for Data Protection.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in the first instance by acknowledgement of this letter, and a full response with the above designated time scale.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

(print your name do not sign)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the CCA

 

WELCOME FINANCE LIMITED

KINGSTON HOUSE

CENTRE 27 BUSINESS PARK

WOODHEAD ROAD, BIRSTALL BATLEY

WEST YORKSHIRE

WF17 9TD

 

 

31/8/2009

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− accounts *******(your account number or numbers)

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.79(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(6) will apply.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

send both by recorded delivery insure you put any previous addresses on the SAR as if you dont they might not send you the details of course if you have lived at the same address since you took out the agreement then you dont need to worry

 

Hope this helps

 

regards

 

martynandemma

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...