Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Abbey and 1st credit


lindseyb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I hope someone can help I have a bank account with abbey which they have closed for me (after I asked for my charges back) but there is an outstanding overdraft which I've refused to pay as it's fully maded up of charges. I have informed the fos and on numberous occassions have written to abbey to try and sort it and they did agree to repay some of the charges.

 

But after they agreed to this there were more charges about to hit the account so they reversed these. As the charges which were reversed hadn't been added on to the total amount I had asked for back I ended up not being repay ALL the charges. I had a very heated discussion with a guy from Abbey about this and he refussed to add the total charges reversed onto the total I was claiming back, which then ment I still owed Abbey the balance on the overdraft they are chasing me for.

 

Abbey have seens filed a default agaisnt me for said overdraft and have now passed it onto 1st credit. I have writen to 1st credit and told them the account is in dispute and has been for a while. They have now written back to me asking for written proof that there has been a complaint registered with the fos, as Abbey are saying they have no notes on their internal system of my complaint. Do I need to send this? I have on all corespondnace sent them the FOS claim ref number. Also is there anything I can do about the default or them continually chasing me for this debt?

 

I am about to start a claim in the small claims court for the outstanding charges but haven't been able to yet due to not having the cash. I also have copies of letters from Abbey's complaints department that they have writen to me in response to my complaints so have mentioned this in my letter to 1st credit so not sure how Abbey have no record of my complaint.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you prove that the closure of your account was in response to your claim for charges?

 

It is contrary to the banking code and to the current account contract to take this kind of retaliatory action. You can include this as part of a complaint to the ombudsman or better still in your County Court claim.

 

Furthermore the bank is in breach of their duties when they pass on your account to a debt collector when it is in dispute. Since July 2007 all bank charges related debts are in dispute. Abbey should know this because they are one of the litigants. Therefore by handing your file over in this way they are once again in breach of the banking code of conduct and also the account contract.

 

You should start your claim to recover your bank charges straightaway but also in the claim you should ask the court for an order preventing any further debt collection activity on the basis that this activity while the account is in dispute is a breach of contract.

 

You should write to first credit and point out to them that the alleged debt is comprised entirely of bank charges and that all bank charges have been dispute since July 2007 and therefore this matter is automatically in dispute. Tell first credit that if they continue their approaches to you that you will report them to the office of fair trading as they know full well that they should not be pursuing accounts which are in dispute. You can say to first credit that you know that they have already come under scrutiny from the office of fair trading and that they should take care to conduct themselves appropriately.

 

At the same time write a letter to Abbey and put them on notice that they are acting in breach of the banking code and that you wish to complain to the ombudsman and that you may also include a complaint about their behaviour with your bank charges claim to the County Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

PLs can someone advise me on what to do???? I have now recieved an allocation questionnaire from the courts which I have to fill in and send back before the 30th dec but not sure what to put. I have filled out most of it but not sure what to put in on the "other information" now that the high courts have ruled against the bank charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i've i don't think I've had an N1 court claim, no 1st credit haven't started court action I did, haven't heard anything not even had a stay, what does this mean? and what will happen next?

not sure what an aq is?

Edited by lindseyb
didn't answer the full reply
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry you've confussed me with all ya abbreviation, i'm the claiment and it's in my local court and I did start the court action but that was a while ago but didn't hear anything, all it says on the papers is name of court, claim no, date that everything needs to be returned - 30th dec then at the top allocation questionnaire

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's in my local court and I sent the papers to my local court using the info from this site. I think I might have been sent a defence but will have to check as I have another one for HSBC but I got sent a "stay" for that 1 from the courts. Do I still need to send this back before the date even if I haven't had a copy of the defence or do I need to put that in the extra info?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just found the defence filed by abbey, pls can anyone help with what to put on the extras section, I had thought about putting the fact that I'm in finical hardship, and that abbey had initial agreed to refund the charges but then added more charges to the account which is why it is like it is now? Is this along the right lines?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea it's a few pages long, but will have to do it in the morning. How important is their defence? What kind of things is the judge looking for in this questionnaire? Panicking slightly now as not really sure what to do and haven't got much time left, although I was planning on taking to the court rather than posting so I know it's there

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to take the AQ back to the court today really as it has the date of the 30th on it. Should I just put a basic outline of what I have done to try and resolve the situation ie i'm in hardship and the account is only charges and I couldn't pay etc??? Pls can someone help is this along the right lines???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now recieved this letter in the post today, which looks like a standard letter sent out and is very similar to one I've recieved from HSBC for the same thing. Do I need to reply to this or what and here back from the court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I haven't heard or done anything about this still last yr, when I recieved a letter from the courts saying it was "stayed" until June. I then still hadn't heard anything so thought no news was good news! I did however keep getting statements from Abbey every month with £50 worth of charges added on to the debt, which is completly made up of charges.

 

I have now got a letter from Abbey saying they wrote to the court on the 17th Dec requesting an "Unless Order" and has sent me copies of the letter, Copy of the proposed Unless Order, and summary of the supreme courts judgment.

 

I would really like some help because I'm not sure what a Unless Order is? Also if there is anything I can do about it? The balance Abbey say I owe now is well over a £1000 which is purely made up of their charges as I haven't use it for nearly 2 yrs. I am and have been for the last yr in financial hardship and have struggled to pay most of my bills, although setting up payment plans I am still behind on some major bills. Can I write to the court and explain my situation and how unreasonable Abbey have been as I have explain my situation to them in the beginning, and should Abbey have continued to add charges each month even when the case was "stayed"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

sorry to bug guys but I wondered if anyone could help me with the "Unless order" Abbey have now sent to the courts, I only had 6 wks to reply and I'm really struggling, please, please, please could anyone help I only have 2 wks left to reply.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...