Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi there. Unfortunately not. Apparently the incident was supposed to have happened on 4th Feb 2021 at 6 something in the morning. I was probably asleep at that time. Card transactions are on the statement on the 4th Feb but are from 3rd of Feb when the transactions took place. Nothing on the 4th of Feb. Although I had another car hire during that time so it would be absurd to even claim that anyone would rent multiple cars concurrently for months at a time. On top of that, whilst going through my statements, there was no payment to these guys so there is no way they'd rent a car to someone without paying a deposit or the rental fee. It's nonsense.       Hi there pal. Will check to see if they have a website now. Not sure but worried that if they'd go to the lengths of lying to the police they'd try to forge hire agreements with myself based on an old on. What they won't be able to do is provide any evidence that they took any deposit or payment from me for that vehicle or any vehicle for that matter in the time leading up to the incident. I will see about sending the SAR to them.   For the Claim form, I didn't know how to turn it into a pdf using my phone so I've taken photos of it and removed my identifying information.                 Total costs for the Claim are 10110 including 410 for Court Fees, so not sure if it's really considered as 10k or not With regards to time, I will start a list now on notes. Thanks.   I have attached the document they sent me regarding the other driver. I have removed some of his identifying info as well as he may be just another victim of these guys. The document isn't signed by anyone.   Basically when the police letter came I phone the son who's number I had multiple times and he told me it's ok, don't worry, he will sort it etc. Eventually he stopped answering my calls, so I sent him so many texts telling him to answer etc. Eventually he answered I yelled at him for using my details like that then told him I'd report him to the police if he didn't fix this. He said there must have been a mistake and that he knows someone else was hiring the vehicle. He then sent me a message on my phone with the details of the person who he claims was driving but does not put anything else in writing regarding this. I then use this to submit the information to the police regarding the incident.   I don't know what the police are doing about this. I attached the document they sent me regarding the driver (albeit it is something with no signiture that they could have put together themselves) as well as another attachment with a hand written letter explaining the fraud I believe they are committing on me as I did not rent that car from them. Might have to just go to a local police station and file an official report on these guys and their bogus response to the police fingering me out and using that to send me a Claim form. How can they do this if I did not go into their office since my last rental from the more than 6 months ago, I didn't sign any hire agreement (unless they forged one, which I wouldn't put past them), I didn't pay them a deposit or rental fee? There is no reasonable explanation how they can claim they gave a car to someone with none of the above. It's absurd.   thanks for the responses everyone.  
    • That's whet the yhellow card is for, they need anything that "Might" be linked to vaccine reporting in.
    • Many thanks @dx100uk I'll head over to the site and keep you posted. 
    • yes dx  the same one and 14 years on still paying    UB... thks have filled in online sar request to halifax  what happens if the halifax can not produce evidence of every payment made over the last 20 years off the original balance    i still have the original typed breakdown of the charges and amount house was sold for etc and the original balance  sent by the halifax 20 odd years ago
    • Yes send an SAR to Halifax.   If you have been making payments, Halifax should have full records available.   Halifax have been known to stop collection activity, if there is any doubt about the outstanding amount or if people stop paying after a number of years of making payments.  Payments made towards a shortfall debt are almost seen as a bonus, as they would not have expected payment to be received in many cases.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

Egg are so far 43 days late with my CCA request


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I CCA'ed Egg on the 9th of July but to this day I have not received anything, that's 43 days since my request.

 

I sent the Letter 1st class recorded but via Royal Mail tracking, no information indicating the letter was delivered so I put in a claim with Royal Mail for a refund.

 

They have returned to me with proof that the Postal Order which was sent with the CCA request, has been Banked!.

 

Please can some one update what to do next.

 

Many Thanks

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites
I CCA'ed Egg on the 9th of July but to this day I have not received anything, that's 43 days since my request.

 

I sent the Letter 1st class recorded but via Royal Mail tracking, no information indicating the letter was delivered so I put in a claim with Royal Mail for a refund.

 

They have returned to me with proof that the Postal Order which was sent with the CCA request, has been Banked!.

 

Please can some one update what to do next.

 

Many Thanks

 

Mark

 

Well Egg have now broken the law because:

 

a) they've not responded to your CCA request

 

b) have cashed a postal order which was not meant for payment on the account

 

c) have not supplied a signed CCA which means the debt is not enforceable so they should never have cashed the postal order.

 

I think these is a follow up letter you can use?

:!: Activ Kapital 2009 - £316 debt cancelled due to no credit agreement

 

:!: TNC Legal Collections (Swinton) - £61 written off due to complaint being upheld with the FOS

 

:D Be Happy and treat people exactly how you would like to be treated

 

:mad: Don't let people take advantage of you and stand up for your rights and beliefs

 

:p You only live once so don't take things so seriously

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to do anything unless they or some other lowlife tries to pursue.

 

But you can send them this; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

I'm still waiting for my CCA request to be honoured, the follow up letter time scale of 14 working days has once again expired on the 12th Sept 09. The follow up letter was also not showing as delivered on Royal Mail track and Trace, but the orginal request was not showing as delivered either but royal mail confirmed postal order was banked so I have made a compensation claim with royal mail to see what they say about the delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well Egg have now broken the law because:

 

a) they've not responded to your CCA request

 

b) have cashed a postal order which was not meant for payment on the account

 

c) have not supplied a signed CCA which means the debt is not enforceable so they should never have cashed the postal order.

 

I think these is a follow up letter you can use?

 

 

Incorrect, Incorrect, Incorrect.

 

There is no law that has been broken.

They have simply failed to produce a valid CCA in reply to your request within the time limits.

 

A simple Letter that cerbs has posted you, should be sent to them via recorded delivery, this then places the account in dispute and demands that they do not pursue any futher collection activity on your 'alleged' account, including marking your credit file adversley.

 

Katpuss, not responding to a CCA request is not against the law, who has said the postal order was cashed against the account?? Even if it was, again this is not against the law, and cashing a postal order and failing to supply a CCA is still not against the law!

 

I trust you mean well, but there are those who might take your advice as gospel and end up in a worse position through bad advice, unless of course you have documented evidence and links to your advice??

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm still waiting for my CCA request to be honoured, the follow up letter time scale of 14 working days has once again expired on the 12th Sept 09. The follow up letter was also not showing as delivered on Royal Mail track and Trace, but the orginal request was not showing as delivered either but royal mail confirmed postal order was banked so I have made a compensation claim with royal mail to see what they say about the delivery.

 

So long as you have sent them the Account in dispute letter that Cerbs linked above then you do not have to do anything further.

 

The fact that you have sent all your correspondence via RD, whether it shows up or not is proof of sending, so do not worry, this is thirty more times DCA's go to tthe trouble of sending out their threatogrammes.

 

You've sent them correspondence via RD, got proof, and I assume you have a copy of what you have sent them?

 

Place the account in dispute, and wait until they either provide you with a 'legally valid CCA' or close their files.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Send the letter in post #4 again, some idiot has pressed the wrong button on their drivel machine & sent you the wrong template letter. :rolleyes:

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 8 years later...

Please can someone give me some advice.

 

Received "Letter Of Claim" from Howard Cohen Solicitors today who have been instructed by Hoist Portfolio Holding Ltd, who purchased an ex Barclaycard acc.

 

Im sure this account is Statute Barred as no payments have been made to the account or acknowledgement of the debt in the last 8 years.

 

Only problem I had was about 2 years ago when Barclays took out £700 from another account and applied it to this account, but I got them to overturn this and move the funds back to the original account.

 

I dont know what to do, pls can anyone help

 

many thanks in advance

 

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

10/10 for getting that money back!!!

 

If its now sb'd (as that payment/reversal doesn't count) send our SB letter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this was just for your ref in case it does end up in a formal claim

is the 'letter of claim' you mention a formal pap?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

had to remove your images

can yo pop your images into one pdf please and attach them.

read upload

 

posting images from hosting sites directly viewable in the msg box forces people that do not have fast internet to slow

and those on mobiles to p'haps waste their bandwidth and money.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great thanks

yes that's a PAP letter

 

when was you last payment?

 

this is what you do

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

particularly the last posts

 

obv don't request docs they have already supplied

 

reviewing the old merged thread here

I suspect this is now statute barred

you can send them our statute barred letter

in the debt collection section of our library.

 

as for your response form:

 

tick d

I dispute this debt because ...it is statute barred,

 

tick box 8

 

I have enclosed the following documents.. FCA Conc Statute barred letter

 

do not sign the letter print your name only

 

you don't need to provide proof of SB, that's upto them to disprove.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

nope

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can someone give me some advice.

 

Received "letter of claim" from Howard Cohen Solicitors today who have been instructed by Hoist Portfolio Holding Ltd, who purchased an ex Egg/Barclaycard acc.

 

History...

16/6/2009 Received “Default Notice”

7/7/2009 I sent letter to Egg requesting the CCA

8/8/2009 I sent letter to Egg requesting if I could make token payments to the account and they accepted

20/8/2009 I sent letter to Egg informing them they have entered default for not providing CCA, I sent another letter stating this on 6/10/2009, a follow up letter on 19/10/2009 as no response.

15/10/2009 Letter from Egg stating what they sent constituted as a copy of the executed agreement (which I never received)

1//2/2010 Received another “Default Notice”

2/3/2010 Egg card terminated

4/4/2010 Finally received a response for the CCA request but only received, which seems to be an agreement/terms of conditions with my name and address printed on and pages of terms and conditions. The signed agreement was not included.

4/2/2012 Received letter from Barclaycard stating they are taking over Egg

22/7/2013 Received letter from Barclaycard informing they have passed acc to Robinson Way for collection

26/7/2013 Received letter from Robinson Way requesting payment

29/7/2013 Sent letter to Robinson Way requesting the account be returned to Barclays for resolution

25/2/2015 Barclays transferred £700 from another account to this account to set off against the balance but after speaking to them on phone they reversed the payment.

9/8/17 Received letter from Barclaycard informing me the acc has been transferred to Hoist Portfolio Holding Ltd who are the new owners

10/8/17 letter from Robinson Way stating their client (Hoist Portfolio) have instructed them to agree with me a payment plan

25/9/17 Letter (Pre-Legal) from Robinson Way stating the acc meets their criteria to be considered legal account and if no payment plan is agreed they will instruct Howard Cohen & Co Solicitors.

28/11/17 “Letter of Claim” received from Howard Cohen & Co Solicitors informing me their intention to issue proceedings in the County Court

 

Should I send the PAP form from this group stating acc in dispute as no signed agreement has been received when the CCA was originally requested?

 

many thanks in advance

 

Mark

 

(sorry for the confusion with the other thread)

jpg2pdf.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...