Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

how to contest a PCN in Oxford pls?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there everyone,

I parked my car on Saturday at the side of the road in an area that was clearly marked as being for parking. There were no yellow lines in the parking area. The parking restrictions detailed on the sign gave the impression that there were no restrictions at that time and that I could park there. When I got back to my car I found a PCN waiting for me! The offence given was a “breach of clearway or red route”. I had another look at the sign and this time I looked at the sign above the one I read which gave different reading!!!!

Of course if I had known there were any parking restrictions other than those on the white sign I would not have parked there!

The sign is very confusing- once I read the white sign I thought it contained all I needed to know!

Another person who hade made the same mistake contacted me and I gave him a witness statement in support of his appeal.

I think I should appeal as it seems to me very unreasonable and that many people are making that mistake and so the sign is not really clear. But if there is no chance of winning it I think I might as well just pay the reduced fine!

Any advice on likelihood of winning and what I should include in my appeal/ how to set it out would be GREATLY appreciated!

Many thanks! :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

You'll need to provide more details.

 

What exactly did the signs say?

 

Where were you parked? (I don't know what is meant by "at the side of the road in an area that was clearly marked for parking" - were you on-street, in a car park, in a parking bay etc.)

 

What was marked on the road at the point where the vehicle was parked?

 

If possible, some photos would help but if not, can you give the location so it can be checked on Google Earth?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) What time did you park and for how long?

 

2)Can you scan, wash and post the PCN please (both sides)?

 

3) Can you provide a picture of the upper sign in its entirety please?

 

As I read that sign, parking is prohibited Monday to Saturday from 7:30 to 9:30 in the morning; parking is then allowed for 30 minutes with no return for 1 hour until 4:00 in the afternoon; parking is then prhibited again until 6:30 in the evening; there is then no restriction until 7:30 the next day - with no restriction at all on Sundays

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

As I read that sign, parking is prohibited Monday to Saturday from 7:30 to 9:30 in the morning; parking is then allowed for 30 minutes with no return for 1 hour until 4:00 in the afternoon; parking is then prhibited again until 6:30 in the evening; there is then no restriction until 7:30 the next day - with no restriction at all on Sundays

 

This is exactly how I read the signs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I parked at 4.30- I had read the white sign thinking that parking restrictions only operated between 9.30-4pm. The ticket was issued at 4.51pm.

 

I do not have a better picture of the sign- I will try to get one.

 

Do you think there is a chance or should I pay the fine? :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I parked at 4.30- I had read the white sign thinking that parking restrictions only operated between 9.30-4pm. The ticket was issued at 4.51pm.

 

I do not have a better picture of the sign- I will try to get one.

 

Do you think there is a chance or should I pay the fine? :(

 

The bright yellow sign saying no stopping 4-6pm should have been a bit of a hint, surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've got nothing to lose by appealing, fragrant verbena (nice name).

 

You can lodge an appeal on the basis that you were genuinely confused by the signage. It's obviously not a legal defence but the local authority can use discretion at this stage. You can try, and see what happens.

 

If you do, make sure you appeal within 14 days of the PCN having been issued.

 

Meantime, if you are able to post the PCN on here, someone can take a look and see if there's anything amiss with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Thank you for your comments- I am trying to upload the images but I do not seem to be able to do them other than as a zip attachment- i hope this works.

 

I have tried to search for the grounds under which I can appeal and a format to structure my appeal but I cannoto seem to find anything...can anyone help please?

 

Many thanks again!

PCN 1.zip

PCN 2.zip

Penalty Notice 1.zip

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see any lines next to the kerb on Google Earth, just a standard parking bay with a broken line outline.

 

What does the upper part of the sign say?

 

It says no stopping but the rest of the street seems to be dyl or zig zags seems a bit of an odd clearway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you see this is some distance away from where I live and I do not really remember what the upper bit of the sign said.

 

Sorry for my ignorance but what is RTO?

 

If I am to appeal- what should my grounds be please?

 

thank you!

 

Its meant to be TRO traffic regulation order, its a document which states the restrictions in place in the street with times and locations. Its available from the Council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I've called the council to enquire about the RTO and they are going to send me a copy.

 

I have drafted the following to send to contest the notice....do you think it is ok please:

 

Dear Sirs,

I am writing to contest the PCN I received on 08/08/2009.

On Saturday, 8 August 2009, I parked my car in St Clements, Oxford. I parked the car at the side of the road in an area that was clearly marked as being for parking. There were no yellow lines in the parking area. Before leaving the vehicle I examined the parking sign, which was a white sign with a white 'P' on a blue background. The parking restrictions detailed on the sign were: Mon-Sat 9.30 am – 4 pm 30 min; no return within 1 hr. Because I was leaving my vehicle after 4:30 p.m. it was clear to me that there were no parking restrictions after that time. When I returned to my car, I found a parking ticket attached to the windscreen, the time of the offence on the ticket was detailed as 4:51 p.m. the offence was given as breach of clearway or red route. The white sign made no reference to there being a clearway or red route in operation.

If I had known there were any parking restrictions within this parking bay, other than those on the white sign I would not have parked there. I did not take any notice of the yellow sign with the white sign, because clearly the parking restrictions were detailed on the white sign as I would have expected.

Thank you all for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The appeal letter has no hope of being successful. You have admitted parking after the permitted time (ie 4.00pm) and have admitted ignoring the yellow No Stopping sign which prohibits any parking between 4pm and 6.30pm.

 

Basically your only hope is that the TRO is faulty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't send a letter just yet. You are waiting on a copy of the RTO. If there's anything untoward in there which renders the bay unenforceable, then you can cite this as the basis of your appeal instead. You've got a couple of weeks yet before you need to have your first appeal in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't send a letter just yet. You are waiting on a copy of the RTO. If there's anything untoward in there which renders the bay unenforceable, then you can cite this as the basis of your appeal instead. You've got a couple of weeks yet before you need to have your first appeal in.

 

TRO, Jamberson.

 

Traffic Regulation Order.

 

Known as a TMO in London; Traffic Management Order

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't send a letter just yet. You are waiting on a copy of the RTO. If there's anything untoward in there which renders the bay unenforceable, then you can cite this as the basis of your appeal instead. You've got a couple of weeks yet before you need to have your first appeal in.

 

In order to qualify for the discounted rate I need to send the appeal by this friday.

 

I've just got the RTO/TRO through...it is quite a long document- what should I be looking for?

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order to qualify for the discounted rate I need to send the appeal by this friday.

 

I've just got the RTO/TRO through...it is quite a long document- what should I be looking for?

 

Many thanks!

 

Look for the restriction that covers the area you parked without looking its hard to be helpful all TROs are laid out differently. If its emailable let me know and I'll give you my address and will look it over for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...