Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • nothing new always been that way for 25+yrs now i had voip lines with NTL back in the late 90's which is why a real trucall box or a handset with real truecall software in it is SO good.   on average i get about 25-35 of these calls a month NONE get thru  the ones that spoof UK or mobile numbers are still screened are easily dealt with the truecall system   if they are real, the only thing they have to do is speak and you get an alert ring to listen to whom call with the option to accept or ZZapp them. once zapped that number never gets thru again.   its worthy to note that the scammers only ever use disconnected numbers, or fake numbers after a known local UK dialling code well the truecall software already knows these numbers as it gets the same databases the scammers use. if the number doesnt come up on the fake/disconnected list, it also then checks if the UK number is listed active UK and will auto put people thru   very clever little device worth every penny and mine is from 2006 when i joined CAG.
    • No the info on comms log isn't quite right,   I hadn't worked since Xmas due to bereavement but I wasn't staying in Somerset since the Xmas. The comms log is very deceitful indeed and after I had finished evaluating it fully I came to the conclusion MB are very manipulative, they lie, cheat and twist the truth, but it only takes the slightest slip up and everything crumbles.   You see in order for MB to have taken any further steps they have to be entitled to take them. So when they lie and try to deceive the truth prevails 😊, so to send a copy of a Default Sums Notice dated 15/1/17 that doesn't exist on the log anywhere and Ive never had the original and then fail to include one in the SAR that is listed on the log as generated on 18/1/17 (not had this one either)  doesn't the consequence of that 1 act prevent them from any further action until the notices are served    86 (e) Notice of default sums (5)If the creditor or owner fails to give the debtor or hirer the notice under this section within the period mentioned in subsection (2), he shall not be entitled to enforce the agreement until the notice is given to the debtor or hirer.       But I am reducing the complaint and sticking to basics
    • keep to recent threads/ifo.   things have changed since the new Conc rules replaced the old rubbish a debt owner must either put up or shut up did you not read the SB letter yourself?      
    • cnt see any indication of what the devil the IVa company were upto in court just because the IVA failed. i can see it was done thru PayPlan, bit it wouldn't have been payplan that did it some fleecing mob like Harrington Brooks or alike.  
    • threads merged  reading up now.   dx  
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

** Help Needed Re : Court And Incasso


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4020 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello,

. I am 40 years old. Myself and my wife have been on a debt management plan for a year now with payplan.We have 15 creditors and and all are ok so far. The only exception is Tesco loan.

They have chased us mercilessly via Incasso solicitors. They took me to court for a CCJ in may, this was granted and the payment figure was £26.60 the same amount as My plan with payplan.

They took me back to court in July to ask for permission to apply for a charging order, the judge did give them permission but would not be enforceable as long as payments were kept up. In that hearing incasso said I never made correct payments, but at the the time I didn’t take that in. The fact is they have always had the correct payments. So incasso are again taking me to court in September for an interim charging order.

The only problem I can see with payments is the CCJ was for £26.60 that was against me, but the loan is a joint loan with my wife, Payplan split the payment and sent £13.30 to Incasso( solicitors) and £13.30 direct to Tesco. Payplan said that in the future incasso could then take my wife to court and get a further £26.60 from her. So doubling the payments. Payplan have now changed there payments and sent the full amount to incasso( Tesco solicitors)

The house is in negative equity, we have young children, my wife has a disability, all other creditors are fine Is there any other defence I could make.

Thankyou Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

You'll need to oppose the Interim Charging Order by getting statements from Payplan showing these payments to Incasso and Tesco and highlighting them for a Judge to see.

As you will be able to demonstrate that Payplan caused the problem by messing up the payments, a Judge should dismiss the Interim Charging Order.

 

Have a look at these links for more info on opposing Charging Orders -

 

 

Insolvency Helpline

National Debtline

 

Help us to keep on helping.

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums.

This site is run solely on donations.

 

You can make a donation

HERE. Thank you.

 

Any advice & opinions given by supasnooper are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't wish to get the CCJ set aside the the following information is for opposing a Charging Order.

 

 

You'll need to get together a Witness Statement to oppose the Charging Order and submit a copy to the court and also send Incasso a copy at least 7 days before the hearing.

 

In your Witness Statement you'll need to list your points of opposition and highlight the problem being caused by Payplan's mistake.

 

May I suggest that you look into getting the CCJ set aside -

 

here's a few links to look at -

 

Setting aside the original CCJ of your CCA

CCJ removal inc. step by step guide

 

Help us to keep on helping.

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums.

This site is run solely on donations.

 

You can make a donation

HERE. Thank you.

 

Any advice & opinions given by supasnooper are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Help us to keep on helping.

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums.

This site is run solely on donations.

 

You can make a donation

HERE. Thank you.

 

Any advice & opinions given by supasnooper are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would strongly advise that you do attend the hearing regarding the Charging Order and oppose the application.

 

If you do not, then the Charging Order would be granted.

 

If granted and you did not keep up the payment of £26.80 then Incasso could possibly enforce a sale order on your house.

 

I see you have read sequenci's sticky on Charging Orders and added a link to this thread.

 

I would seriously consider looking into getting the CCJ set aside as you were badly advised by Payplan into accepting the CCJ.

 

Help us to keep on helping.

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums.

This site is run solely on donations.

 

You can make a donation

HERE. Thank you.

 

Any advice & opinions given by supasnooper are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you in arrears on the judgment order?

 

Have you made a CCA request?

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Yes, I agree you should arrange to attend the hearing in September to tell your side of the story. However, I suggest you should provide the judge with documents from Payplan to show you have been paying £26.60 per month as required under the court order. You will need to send a witness statement to court in order to produce any such documents. I also suggest you let the court have a copy of the letters from Payplan showing they split the amounts to Incasso and Tesco. If you haven’t got this information in writing, I think your first job is to ask Payplan for something in writing.

 

Next job is for you to write up your side of the case in your own words and post it on this thread so that Caggers can help to turn your story into a witness statement.

 

Finally, although you have been paying, there is no guarantee that Tesco have a valid agreement. This is the CCA that Paul mentioned above. Did you get one from Incasso with the original claim form (N1) from the Court or do you have the original? If so, can you post up a copy after blocking out your personal information?

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the reply's, Tesco did produce a true CCA.Im not sure incasso have acted within the law though.I will post the full story and hopefully get a witness srarement put together,thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

HOW DO I WRITE A WITNESS STATEMENT PLEASE

I contacted Payplan in August 2008, as we were experiencing financial difficulties. I and payplan wrote to Tesco and explained the situation, with an offer of payment of payment we could afford.

03/10/2008 Tesco wrote to me and to my wife separately and accepted the offer of reduced payments. Tesco and incasso denied these letters

24/10/2008 Tesco wrote ant told us the account was being held with credit management services and they would periodically review it.

24/11/2008 another letter to each of us accepting our reduced offer.

29/11/2008 Letter from Triton credit services, saying pay in full or CCJ, Attacement of earnings or take our possessions. Also said our client request agents to visit you personally.

16/12/2008 Letter from Incasso solicitors request the full amount in 7 days, or legal action.

07/01/2009 Court hearing in Northampton County court, payplan filled in my paperwork, judgement came back with CCJ for exactly the same amount as my offer.

20/05/2009 Letter from Incasso Tesco solicitors, we enclose by way of service upon you , filed at court. Had the hearing moved to my local court?

11/06/2009 In court, I was very nervous and a bit confused as to what was going on. But basically the judge gave them permission to apply for a charging order, but it must not be enforced. They solicitor mentioned that correct payments had not bee received (but I was slow on the uptake and was to nervous).

11/08/2009 new letter from Incasso, basically going back to court for an interim charging order. That date is set for 25 sept.

When all this began payplan said, because it is a joint loan and only myself was in court the payment should be split, £13.30 to incasso, and £13.30 to Tesco. They said incasso could then take my wife to court and get a further £26.60 from her.

Payment Tesco have received since Jan 09.

13/01/2009 £26.60 via incasso

18/02/2009 £13.30 via incasso + 25/02/2009 £13.30 Via RBS(Tesco) so £26.60 in total.

12/03/2009 £13.30 via incasso + 18/03/2009 £13.30 Via RBS(Tesco) so £26.60 in total

15/04/2009 £13.30 via incasso + 16/04/2009 £13.30 Via RBS(Tesco) so £26.60 in total

18/05/2009 £13.30 via incasso + 22/05/2009 £13.30 Via RBS(Tesco) so £26.60 in total

16/06/2009 £13.30 via incasso + 16/06/2009 £13.30 Via RBS(Tesco) so £26.60 in total

10/07/2009 I told Payplan all £26.60 must go to Incasso so it did this month.

I also in June + July Paid the full £26.60 via bank transfer to incasso. So in June + July they got £53.20 double what they should Have.

  • So to add they have never not received the correct amount .
  • There is no arrears
  • The house has little or no equity
  • It is our children’s home
  • All other 12 creditors are great
  • Payplan made errors in the payments
  • It’s a joint loan and a joint owned house, but they are only chasing 1 of us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please look again at the links provided in post #8 ;)

 

Your opposition does not particularly need to be a witness statement but a structured statement that include your major points of opposition.

 

Help us to keep on helping.

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums.

This site is run solely on donations.

 

You can make a donation

HERE. Thank you.

 

Any advice & opinions given by supasnooper are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 weeks later...

Just come back from court, all the great advice was to no avail.The judge made her mind up before i spoke.I gave really good points in defence,but it was granted.

 

They only thing she put on it was, there will be no order for sale granted.

 

Thanks for the reply's to my original post.Life moves on.So onto the next battle.

 

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...