Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Buildings Insurance Nightmare - Help Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I really, really need some help with a buildings insurance claim/mortgage company mis-selling the policy but it refers to my home in Spain rather than Britain. I have tried and tried to get information regarding regulation here in Spain but just can't get anywhere at all.

 

Please don't let my location put you off helping me because I'm hoping someone can tell me what my position would be in Britain and then I can maybe find out if the same applies here (Are all EU countries the same regulations?).

 

OK - I was visiting family in the UK for Christmas/New Year 2007 when I received a phone call from my neighbour to tell me the firebrigade had been called to remove what was left of my roof, from the street, after it collapsed in a heavy rain/thunderstorm.

 

I immediately contact my insurance company and they arranged for an assessor to look at the damage - huge mess inside the house because the roof had just caved in and then it had continued to rain which did even more damage!

 

Long story short - insurance refuse to pay for the buildings or contents insurance because they say there wasn't enough rain and the roof wasn't maintained (?)

 

Since then we've had to rent and struggled to keep paying the mortgage too while we try to save the money to do the work ourselves. We don't have the money to pay a lawyer because they've advised us that it will cost €2000 for our own report and another €5000 up front to take the insurance company to court. (there's no citizen's advice bureau here).

 

The bank won't help with our claim against the insurance but they're the ones that sold us the policy which they insisted we had to have to protect their investment in the property.

 

My question is do we have a case against the bank mis-selling us a policy that we thought covered us and them but it quite clearly doesn't - the house is a wreck after 18 months without a roof?!

 

To add insult to injury the bank renewed the insurance policy for another year, last October!! We insisted that it isn't insurable without a roof but they insisted we had to have the buildings cover (?!) We've repeatedly asked both the bank and insurance company for a copy of the new policy to show exactly what is covered but we never get any replies.

 

We've now got some money together to put a new roof on the house and can pay a lawyer to look at our case so I would really like to know where we'd stand in the UK just so I can at least have some information to ask the lawyer questions here to see if the same regulations/laws apply - or at least similar ones.

 

Many, many thanks for anyone that replies to help me with this. It's been a nightmare 19 months for my family (we have young children who lost most of their toys and games when the roof collapsed over their bedroom). Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I freely admit I have no idea of the Spanish system, but can say the following for the British system.

 

Regarding the roof caving in. You advise it was as a result of rain / thunderstorm. These should not cause damage to a good roof. The Insurance company would class this as wear and tear.

 

However, the resultant damage would be covered under the accidental damage section of the policy.

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I freely admit I have no idea of the Spanish system, but can say the following for the British system.

 

Regarding the roof caving in. You advise it was as a result of rain / thunderstorm. These should not cause damage to a good roof. The Insurance company would class this as wear and tear.

 

However, the resultant damage would be covered under the accidental damage section of the policy.

 

Thank you so much for your reply. That's pretty much what we'd thought too but they have refused to pay for anything at all, even the contents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...