Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • anotheruser0000
      Parking Fee Paid But Input Incorrect VRN

      By anotheruser0000 · Posted

      Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • dx100uk
      Parking Fee Paid But Input Incorrect VRN

      By dx100uk · Posted

      you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • anotheruser0000
      Highview/DCB(L) ANPR PCN - Letter of Claim - Now Claimform - overstay - Riverside Retail Park in Norwich, Norfolk.

      By anotheruser0000 · Posted

      Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • lookinforinfo
      Highview/DCB(L) ANPR PCN - Letter of Claim - Now Claimform - overstay - Riverside Retail Park in Norwich, Norfolk.

      By lookinforinfo · Posted

      Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • anotheruser0000
      Highview/DCB(L) ANPR PCN - Letter of Claim - Now Claimform - overstay - Riverside Retail Park in Norwich, Norfolk.

      By anotheruser0000 · Posted

      Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Cabot Court Claim *** Claim Settled ***

Nottsdave

By Nottsdave
in Financial Legal Issues

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4283 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Nottsdave

Nottsdave

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hi

 

Just received a claim form out of Northampton Bulk for CC debt over 11k.

 

 

P.O.C.s are as follows,

 

The claimant is part of the Cabot Financial Group and has purchased the debt(s) scheduled below. Despite request for payment the defendant has failed to pay the sum of £***** in relation to the defendants Abbey National CC account number ********. And the claimant claims the sum of ******* together with interest under section 69 of the County Courts act 1984 and cost.

Morgans Solicitors.

 

My question is can I send off the CPR 31.14 request and if I do what will I ask for as nothing in listed in the P.O.C.s just what Ive typed out above ?

 

Ta

 

Notts

Edited by Nottsdave

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

MARTIN3030

MARTIN3030

Posted
Posted

Ok done

  • Haha 1

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
MARTIN3030

MARTIN3030

Posted
Posted

Pocs are very vague.Have you other threads regarding this will be easier to answer knowing some background info.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nottsdave

Nottsdave

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

 

I rec a few letters from Cabot demanding money but I ignored, next thing claim form from Northampton.

With the P.O.C.s being so vague I am asking what I can ask for in relation to documents.

I was planning to use CPR 31.14 asking for the agreement/DN/NOA what do you think ?

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites
MARTIN3030

MARTIN3030

Posted
Posted

Yes I would say so.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nottsdave

Nottsdave

Posted
  • Author
Posted

OK

 

CPR request going today (recorded) I have also acknowledged service online (Mycol).

 

Will wait to see whats comes from Morgans and then be back for help with defence.

 

cheers

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites
herbie171

herbie171

Posted
Posted

Hi Nottsdave

 

I am expecting a claim from cabot very soon done all the her said ,she said bit and now waiting for the claim to come via Northampton Bulk cc.

I also expect the same P.O.C.s as you and would be interested in what you asked for in the letter sent to Morgan.

 

It also seems like will will both be in the same court I will look out for you

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nottsdave

Nottsdave

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi Herbie

 

This is what I have requested via CPR 31.14 ,

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the originals should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 The Notice of Assignment

3 The default notice

Hope this helps

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites
robcag

robcag

Posted
Posted
Hi Herbie

 

This is what I have requested via CPR 31.14 ,

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the originals should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

 

2 The Notice of Assignment

 

3 The default notice

 

Hope this helps

 

Notts

 

Hi Notts

 

It might be worth asking for proof of registered/recorded delivery and subsequent proof of signed for receipt for the NoA (as required by the LoP Act 1925 ss 136 + 196), that's unless you've acknowledged receiving a NoA.

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nottsdave

Nottsdave

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ok

 

The 7 days are up, what the best thing to do now, I still have to put in a defence but I have one I prepared earlier (so to say).

Is there anyway I can put pressure on them to produce ?

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites
cymruambyth

cymruambyth

Posted
Posted

Hi, just to let you know I didn't go for a SD in the end but filed a longish defence, most of which is on my thread.

I think if you receive no response from Morgan's you can enter an 'embarrassed' defence as you will have no documenation on which to base a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites
cymruambyth

cymruambyth

Posted
Posted

Hi this is the one I was given to work from. If I find mine I'll post it.

 

 

1. I, ********** of ************** make this statement as my defence to the claim brought by **************

 

2. The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR even allowing for the constraints of the bulk issue system

 

3. No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered and despite a request to the claimant for further information via CPR 31.14 dated xx/xx/xxxx sent by recorded delivery none has been forthcoming and as a result I cannot plead in defence to the claim

 

4. Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimants claim appears without merit, the defendant asks to be allowed to submit a fully particularised defence should the claimant provide copies of the original documents he will rely upon.

 

5. Further to that above 4 paragraphs, the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.

 

 

Statement of truth bit here

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Nottsdave

Nottsdave

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So .....

 

I sent in the defence on time had a letter from the court saying that they are forwarding defence to claimant and they have 28 days to decide if they wish to continue.

 

So the CPR 31.14 letter states that they have 7 days to respond, they dont respond. The system is crap why are they allowed to get away with breaking the rules :mad:

 

So I now just have wait for the tos*ers to get off there ass:mad::mad::mad:

 

Rant over.......................

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nottsdave

Nottsdave

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Its still with Northampton Bulk Centre at the moment, can I complain to them ?

And is there a standard form to complain on do you know ?

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...