Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How to find old (over 6 years ago) CCJs?


DarkRain
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks.

 

I got into a lot of debt back in 2000/2001 with various credit card companies. Since then I've pretty much stuck my head in the sand.

 

I now want to try and sort myself out as best I can.

 

I haven't paid any of my creditors a penny in that time, but unfortunately wrote to a few of them a couple of years ago basically telling them I haven't got any money at the moment.

 

I remember getting a couple, possibly three CCJs back in 2001-03. They have now all disappeared off my credit file though.

 

I would now like to try and work out which of my debts will become statute barred in the next couple of years and which have CCJs attached to them, making that not an option.

 

How can I find out about any CCJs against me dating back 6+ years?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest janensteve

Judgments and decrees are reported by credit reference agencies and by Registry Trust Ltd for a period of six years from their date of registration. Judgments and decrees paid within a calendar month can be removed from the Register. Where the judgment or decree was paid outside one calendar month, the judgment will be marked on the register as satisfied but will be reported for the six years.

 

IF Registry Trust hold the data for more than 6 years but do not report them, then they may be able to help. see link below

 

FAQs & Help - Trust Online

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once CCJs are six years old to enable the creditor to take enforcement they must apply to the court for permission & give a very good reason why.

 

If they don't already have a CCJ can they still get one after 6 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't made a payment or acknowledged the debt for a clear period of six years (five in Scotland) it would be Statute Barred & they will be unable to obtain a CCJ.

 

Yes, but I think for a couple of creditors I reset it 2 years ago. :-(

 

So if I can establish which already have judgments and which don't I can try and ignore the ones that don't for another 4 years. Not ideal but...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I paid my £8 with CCJs, court orders & fines - Search yourself and others - Trust Online and it came back with nothing. Not even a CCJ from 2003 that I know fell of my credit file last month.

 

So I have no idea who filed the other couple of CCJs I think I got. I say think because I assume those nasty brown envelopes I got back in 2001/02 went on to become full blown CCJs.

 

No idea how I should proceed now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they start chasing you again the chances are if they have a CCJ they will mention it. However even if they don't there is nothing to stop you sending the Statute Barred letter, the onus then will be on them to prove otherwise. Also, if the original creditor has sold the debt on to a DCA it will be in a portfolio with hundreds if not thousands of others & they very rarely pass the paperwork with them. So it could be that the DCA is unaware of the existence of a CCJ anyway & because they are no longer on your credit file will have no way of finding out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they start chasing you again the chances are if they have a CCJ they will mention it. However even if they don't there is nothing to stop you sending the Statute Barred letter, the onus then will be on them to prove otherwise. Also, if the original creditor has sold the debt on to a DCA it will be in a portfolio with hundreds if not thousands of others & they very rarely pass the paperwork with them. So it could be that the DCA is unaware of the existence of a CCJ anyway & because they are no longer on your credit file will have no way of finding out.

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

I'm worried about sending off a statute barred letter or a CCA request in case it just sets them off in some way and they damage my now clean credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a default or CCJ has dropped off your file it cannot be re-registered.

 

If they are not in contact with you there's no point in contacting them really.

 

Well I do get three or four letters a year from them and one rang my mum at my old address (9 years ago!) last month.

 

She's been through a lot lately with the loss of my dad and I don't want any doing that again. She just said I didn't live there any more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would let sleeping dogs lie & just ignore their letters.

 

The problem with DCAs once they establish initial contact they'll start turning the screws and try and wear you down. You'll end up with endless 'phone calls, text messages & letters.

 

Every now and again they'll pass debts amongst themselves in the hope that different tactics will bear fruit for them, so any initial letters will just be a phishing exercise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would let sleeping dogs lie & just ignore their letters.

 

The problem with DCAs once they establish initial contact they'll start turning the screws and try and wear you down. You'll end up with endless 'phone calls, text messages & letters.

 

Every now and again they'll pass debts amongst themselves in the hope that different tactics will bear fruit for them, so any initial letters will just be a phishing exercise.

 

That sounds like the best idea, providing my mum doesn't get any more calls.

 

I assume once the debts become statute barred it's possible to stop them completely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, when they become Statute Barred if they continue to pursue once you've sent the SB letter & if they continue they will be in breach of OFT guidelines and you can start complaining to the regulatory bodies.

 

 

Right. Thanks again for your (and everyone's) advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hijack your thread but I was searching for some info - hence reading your thread, if there was a CCJ in 2001 and the DCA are now trying to enforce it (by Charging Order) can we apply to have the CCJ set aside or is it too old? I have tried the trust and know there is no record any more of the CCJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...