Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax CCA - is this enforceable please ? They have passed to solictors!


time35run
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I hope you can see my scans below of the CCA that halifax have sent to me. It contains my current address (where I have blacked out) but no dates or signatures at all.

 

I CCA's them back in May, rec'd this a couple of weeks ago and they are claiming they have done enough ! They passed it to Westcott, so I wrote to Westcott and told them it was in dispute, they then asked for details which I ignored (as Halifax have all the details). Westcott have now passed the debt on to Nelson Guest and Partners who are threatening me.

 

I would be grateful if someone could tell me if this is enforceable and what I now do abot halifax/westcott and nelson guest.

 

Oh and I have applied for a SAR but not received it as yet.

 

Thanks

 

CCA1.jpg

 

CCA2.jpg

 

CCA3.jpg

 

CCA4.jpg

 

CCA5.jpg

 

CCA6.jpg

 

CCA7.jpg

 

CCA8.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

COU2.jpg

 

COU3.jpg

 

COU4.jpg

 

COU5.jpg

 

COU6.jpg

 

COU7.jpg

Edited by time35run
remove personal info!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Try editing the picture after you've scanned it in with Paint (just right click the picture wherever it's been saved and go to "Open With" and then "Paint").You can then use the paintbrush or eraser tool over the personal bits.Save it and upload it, you should be hot to trot ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you take out the card??? :)

9-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent:o !! Lloyds and Halifax!

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Capital One

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax Card Services

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Marbles

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax (Birchave0's sis)

8-3-07 PPI refund Lloyds TSB Loan £1200 + £2900 off loan balance

22-5-07 Halifax *Won* £1025

23-9-07 Goldfish 8k balance written off, £2300 PPI + charges returned, no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a COPY of the agreemnet, but not the original if that makes sense!

What they do is send you a template agreement and type your details in, address, account no., balance, etc.

The original agreement would have been signed by you and Halifax, it would have the perscribed terms.

 

This is just a statement of account really.

I would go back and ask for a copy of the original "signed" agreement. Chances are all they will have will be an application form of sorts.

 

PS they also have two different default rates, the new ones (£12) came into force in 2006 so have no connection to an account taken out over 6 years ago :)

  • Haha 1

9-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent:o !! Lloyds and Halifax!

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Capital One

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax Card Services

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Marbles

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax (Birchave0's sis)

8-3-07 PPI refund Lloyds TSB Loan £1200 + £2900 off loan balance

22-5-07 Halifax *Won* £1025

23-9-07 Goldfish 8k balance written off, £2300 PPI + charges returned, no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, that is what I thought too and I responded when I got this stuff some weeks ago saying it was un-enforceable and i heard nothing further from them until i then got a letter from Westcott. I wrote to Westcott advising them it was in dispute and they responded asking for deatils of the dispute and asking me to pay the amount that wasn't in dispute. I ignored that letter (maybe not the best move?!)

 

Westcott have now passed it on to Nelson Guest and Partners.

 

Please could you advise me what letter I need to send to fend off Westcott and Nelson as I think Halifax had no right to pass it on while it was in dispute anyway ??

 

Thanks for your help.

Edited by time35run
spelling!
Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a template letter that I've used on many occasions, I just change the names, etc :D

 

Miss birchave

 

DCA/Solictor/etc

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

date

 

Dear sir/madam

 

Re: − Account/Reference Number xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated (date) ; sadly I feel that you are not in possession of all of the facts surrounding this account.

 

In January of last year I made two requests for information to Halifax Plc.

 

First was a full Subject Access Request under s7 of the Data Protection Act 1998.

The second was a request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

They were sent recorded delivery on 20-1-07 and contained the required fees.

 

To Date Halifax has NOT complied with either of my requests, and since such time - Halifax plc are in default, and the account remains in dispute.

 

They have failed to supply ALL of the information on the account.

They have also failed to provide a true copy of any “Executed Credit Agreement” for the account. An unexecuted agreement containing none of the prescribed terms and conditions or the cancellation details is neither acceptable nor enforceable - even with a court order.

 

This account and Halifax plc are/remain in default of these requests, and whilst they remain in default - they are barred under legislation from attempting to enforce any such alleged agreement.

I am sure you will be aware; enforcement under a contract includes requests/demands for payment, and/or performing any alleged term or condition of said agreement.

 

If you or Halifax process any data, or harass me for payment you are in breach of the CCA 1974, I will take court action for all breaches of the Act.

 

Following on from this, I would now confirm that whilst this account is in dispute, I expressly withdraw, and do not consent to any data processing regarding me - under any implied authority or otherwise; this is supported under s10 of the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

I would now instruct you to remove my telephone number from your records; if you are to contact me it must be in writing. You are not permitted to pass any information onto any third party.

 

I would also ask for a true copy of the authority, deed or notice of assignment allowing you to take action in regard to this account. Failure to provide this will be a breach of the OFT guidelines on debt collection.

 

I also intend to report Halifax and you to both the FOS and the OFT for your failings.

 

I would also like to inform you that both EOS and Blair, Oliver, Scott have returned this account to Halifax in the past seven months, I think you will find this is due to lack of information regarding this account.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

 

birchave (Miss)

 

just change things around to suit!!! ;)

9-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent:o !! Lloyds and Halifax!

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Capital One

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax Card Services

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Marbles

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax (Birchave0's sis)

8-3-07 PPI refund Lloyds TSB Loan £1200 + £2900 off loan balance

22-5-07 Halifax *Won* £1025

23-9-07 Goldfish 8k balance written off, £2300 PPI + charges returned, no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

simples!!!! ;):D:p

9-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent:o !! Lloyds and Halifax!

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Capital One

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax Card Services

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Marbles

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax (Birchave0's sis)

8-3-07 PPI refund Lloyds TSB Loan £1200 + £2900 off loan balance

22-5-07 Halifax *Won* £1025

23-9-07 Goldfish 8k balance written off, £2300 PPI + charges returned, no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...