Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

unenforceable agreement in court


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have what I think is a cast-iron case for damages with an unenforceable default notice and termination of contract and non-existent credit agreement.

 

However I know several caggers have gone to court and lost due to biased judges.

 

My question is if I lost under these circumstances could I be forced to pay the remainder of my loan despite no CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

because that is what the law says, try convincing a knob of a judge that they dont understand the law, and see how far that gets you.

 

I went to court in July with a application form for a agreement and no D/N and the judge said as far as he was concerned it looked liked a agreement to him.

 

Result I have now taken legal advice to fight the case.

 

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not on. The law states its unenforceable so thats what it should be. When did the judges get to make up the rules as they go along then?

 

 

It's a good point the law is fairly clear on the point of unenforceable agreements.

 

Where does this end??? Judges deciding rape laws don't apply, anymore.

 

Which judges are guilty of this I think a list needs to made and submitted to the judges governing body explaining these judges need to apply the law not make it up or decide on a different interpretation.

 

I think the word biased is quite interesting here. 'A judge biased' this does not sit well.

 

Any judge favouring a DCA should be struck off or educated on the law because they clearly need help understanding.

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why there are a number of agreements that are undergoing scrutiny in the high court... too many cases are being awarded to the claimants despite the agreements not complying with the law.

 

I have always said from the start that it is easier defending action from a creditor on the basis of an unenforceable agreement than it is trying to seek declarations of unenforceability.

 

Until someone decides to really test their claim and get some case law on the books it will remain that judges may get it wrong. Like football refs, they are only human.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly the bottom line here is don't rely on your credit agreement being unenforceable. It doesn’t matter what the law says, its on the day and the judge.

Looks like illegal charges is the way to go and try to last it out the 6yrs, or pay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so whats the point in sending a CCA request if the creditor can still take you to court with an unenfforceable agreement, surley this thread contradicts this whole forum.

 

Well I always send in the CCA request to see if they actually DO have a CCA. 99% of the DCA's I have fought have never had a CCA and soon disappear under the rock in which they came. The other 1% I then hit with the unlawful charges route and again they disappear.

 

I would always ask for the CCA purely to find out if they have an agreement and if it is enforcable. If its not enforcable and court is on the cards we just pray for a decent judge who knows the law

 

Sploits :p

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note your point regarding the DN

 

I want to take 1st Direct to Court as they never issued a default notice. I called my legal helpline you get with Home Insurance and they have told me only T/S can enforce any breach of the CCA 1974

 

Totally confused now#//

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are high court cases that you should quote in your defence which advise that no court can enforce an unenforceable agreement

 

if a judge ignores this then you have 100% grounds for appeal

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judgment of Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in the case of Wilson v First County Trust Ltd - [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul), paragraph 29.

 

 

'...signature of a document containing all the prescribed terms is an essential prerequisite to the court’s power to make an enforcement order'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your right Zazen, but try telling that to a prat of a Judge, I quoted the above but he wasnt havin any of it.

 

I appreciate you can appeal.

 

Told me to go away get legal advice and adjourned

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...