Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cap quest - stat demand


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have just recieved a letter from cap quest for a sum of £1146.50 the debt relates to an unpaid balance due under the credit agreement dated 01 oct 98, the rights and duties were passed to the creditor on 29th sept 06. included in the letter is a stat demand for bankruptcy petiton.

 

I last made a payment in 2001 to littlewoods. I have had a couple of letters from capquest but never acknowledged them. I am worried about losing my home as i am unable to pay this amount as i am a single mother 0f 2 young children and money is tight. Am i right in thinking if i reply with in the 18 days the following letter it will go away as they are just using bully boy tactics

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

I have never acknowledged the debt so unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me to recover the alleged amount claimed.

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statue barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the letter. Report them to the OFT and TS as soon as possible. Do not phone these losers and never sign your name.

Try not to panic. You won't lose your home and after that letter they should crawl under a rock.

Andy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have received a stat demand then you must apply for it to be set aside to do this you will need forms 6.4 and 6.5 from here Forms

 

This needs to be done at the nearest county court that deals with bankruptcy to find your nearest one have a look here Her Majesty's Courts Service - Court Information and Addresses

 

 

Also have a read of this thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/205487-capquest-statutory-demand-urgent-2.html#post2241838

 

saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the treads as advice down load the forms need any help with them shout

Also we are aware how you feel, however be assured that we will help you to get through this.

So take control take action,

The temerity of these people (DCA), they just send out SD them and hope that you will not take action

TOTHEM IT IS THE NUMBER GAMES DO NOT PLAY THIS GAME.

Please sleep well you are in safe hands

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it me or are we seeing a rash of Stat demands from this lowlife company again, one would have thought they would have learnt by now, it's time that the OFT got involved

They do seem to come in batches

 

Rather like buses you dont see one for a while then they all come at once

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi i have sent my letter to capquest as above asking them to prove it, i'm now looking at doing the 6.4 and 6.5 form to have it set aside. The forms are asking for dates and times of hearings etc. my letter from capquest only gives the name of the court nothing else, also the letter was sent by normal post so how can they prove when the 18 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LL....apologies as I hadn't seen this before....firstly if you haven't already PLEASE report this to the OFT...you will need to set this aside at the nearest county court to you that handle bankruptcies...please note that you should ring the court named on the demand to check they handle bankruptcies, if it isn't then it could possibly be an abuse of the process, you've got 18 days from the date you received it to set it aside, and you'll need to submit forms 6.4 (set aside) and 6.5 (affadavit).....they are trying to collect on a debt that is statute barred !!! set this aside !!! Using the Insolvency Service to collect debts is generally frowned on by the judiciary.....(let alone the debt being statute barred).....

 

You will get a date once you take the forms 6.4 and 6.5 to the court (along with the original sat demand) - take copies of everything....Capquest will NOT turn up to court !!! Another debt collection agency had requirements placed on them earlier this year for doing JUST this - The Office of Fair Trading: OFT imposes requirements on 1st Credit over debt collection practices

 

you can find the forms electronically here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/86067-getting-statutory-demand-set.html

 

And you will find PLENTY of examples of affadavits in here - DCA Legal Successes - The Consumer Forums

 

If you aren't sure of what to do then please shout...you MUST report this to the OFT....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...