Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds


You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds



BankFodder BankFodder


BankFodder BankFodder

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks D.   This has got me all of a dither   I feel very naive,  I thought common sense would rule the day!  CST LAW.pdf Smart Parking Rejection.pdf POPLA_Rejection.pdf
    • yes I have used a pay as you go card and my bank card. I have to sent them my banks statements to show them?  And when you say "to show them some financial reason " you mean my part-time job salary?  
    • Okay, that will suffice as a letter of rejection – although I don't understand why you have to write pages and pages of everything instead of simply making the point that you need to make. The same with your claim form. It's a great shame that you haven't actually stated your your main cause of action on your claim form which is that you asserted your statutory right to reject and that the dealer breach their statutory duty by not accepting the rejection and refusing to refund. This is a glaring omission and at some point you have to remedy it. If you haven't actually claimed that then you haven't given the dealer an opportunity to defend on that particular point – and of course by not bringing it up now, in principle you are not asking the court to address that point. You should amend the claim. Once you sue on the basis that you have asserted your right to reject and that the dealer refuses to comply, then you have pretty well 100% chance of winning. However, you are not exploiting this because you have not raised this in your particulars of claim. Strictly speaking you should amend the claim and then the dealer should have a further right to put in a defence. Of course I may have missed it in your nine page particulars of claim so please will you confirm that you did not raise the issue of rejection in your claim form.
    • Thanks - I got this off ABTA website   If there are significant changes to the main characteristics of the holiday that mean a significant change to the holiday as whole you are entitled to an offer of an alternative holiday, or a refund of your holiday cost. ABTA cannot determine what is and isn’t a significant change to your particular package holiday, however a general overview of what might be a significant change is below:   a change of resort;  a change of accommodation to that of a lower category and/or price;  a change of flight time or delay of flight of more than 12 hours (in respect of a 14-day duration.  A change of flight time less than 12 hours may still be regarded as a significant change in respect of a lesser duration) or involving a reduction in time spent at the resort which is significant in relation to the length of the holiday;  a change of airport that's inconvenient to you.  If the holiday or trip can’t actually be provided due to closures and limitations, then you have a right to a refund.   On Jet 2 T & C's it does say a change of accommodation is a minor change,   however,  I think that is subjective as what is minor to one person is possible significant to another and to me it is significant that the hotel is closed.   They have not even said what they would offer me so I agree I don't think we should pay any balance until this is at least discussed.   There are only 2 other hotels in Punta Prima which offer all inclusive and both get poorer reviews that the one we booked.   I know this won't make a difference to Jet2, however one of them is also 1.5km from the beach! Our booked accommodation was actually on the beach.   I am so frustrated with Jet 2 and unsure where to turn now.
    • Well you need to show some financial reason for the temp lapse in reasoning..   And it would help to mention and send proof that since the event in January...you have used and purchased your own passes regularly so have learnt from your mistake   I would get this in today Time is tight to court case
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies

Deed of Assignment

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3987 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if this is in the correct place.


Can someone please explain a deed of assignment,should a DCA be able to provide one if requested,to varify that they have the right to collect a debt.


I'm a bit confused as to what this is and what it means.:confused:


Sorry in advance if it seems a daft question.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Deed of Assignment is a list of business transactions between buyers and sellers of credit agreements and only a court is entitled to have access to it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you pinky,that cleared up my confusion.


How do you find out if a DCA has the right to collect a debt.Do you just ask in writing if they have purchased the debt,and are they obliged to tell you.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should receive a Notice of Assignment from the original creditor telling you that they have sold the debt on and to whom. If you didn't get one, you can send a letter asking the DCA to prove the debt they are trying to collect is yours:


Dear Sir/Madam


You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.


I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).


I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.


I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.


Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.


I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.


I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.


I/we look forward to your reply.


Yours faithfully

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the one i meant,Notice of assignment,i was getting it confused with the deed.I have never received this.



Thank you so much for straightening that out for me, i'll send the letter you posted up.


Many thanks pinky

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just somthing i found i really should get out more


Assigning A Debt Or Benefit Of Contract?


6 December 2005




Assigning A Debt Or Benefit Of Contract?


It is important to first provide the debtor with a notice of the assignment!


Other points and issues that should be borne in mind:


· In principle, the benefit of a contract can be legally assigned without consent,

provided there is no express prohibition on assignment or, for example, a requirement that consent

is obtained.


· Where there is no restriction on assignment, the usual way of assigning the benefit of

contractual rights is by statutory assignment. The assignment must be in writing, signed by the

assignor, absolute (not purporting to be by way of charge only) and notice in writing must be

given to the other contracting party (section 136, Law of Property Act 1925).


· If a contract is not effectively assigned under statute, it may still be assigned under

common law by an equitable assignment. An equitable assignment may exist where the requirements

for a statutory assignment are not satisfied. The main practical consequence of an equitable

assignment is that the assignee cannot bring an action in its own name against the third party,

but must fall back on the rules governing equitable assignments and join the assignor as a party

to the action.


It is, in any event, desirable for notice of an assignment to be given to the third party because

the third party will otherwise be entitled to continue to make payments to the assignor. Notice

will give the assignee priority over any other assignee that has failed to give notice, provided

there is no knowledge of such prior assignment.


Id quot circumiret, circumveniat.


please do not take my word for anything please do your own research All that i make comments on are done in good faith and to the best of my knowledge

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did i understand that correctly,if i received no notice,they cannot assign to a third party, ie a DCA.

I'm trying to understand but i'm having a hard time grasping this stuff:-(


Thank you lilly for your post,saved for future reference.I will keep reading it untill i understand it correctly.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This might help I got this from here;


The assignment under is subject to certain conditions all of which must be met in order for the assignment to be effectual in law.

The conditions which must be met are as follows:


Treitel (The Law of Contract 11th Edition) defines "assignment" as the process under which the benefit of a contract may be transferred to a third party without the consent of the party liable under the contract (see pages 701 to 702).

For an assignment to be valid, the following requirements must be satisfied (see Treitel pages 678-682):

1) the assignment must be in writing under the hand of the assignor (s.136 Law of Property Act 1925)

2) there must be an intention to assign

3) the assignment must be communicated to the assignee by the assignor

4) notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

If these conditions are not met, then the assignment is not valid in Law and the title, benefits and burden of the account rest with the assignor.

The status of data controller also only passes to the assignee upon lawful perfection of the assignment.

A notice served by the postal service is only deemed served if it complies with the requirements set out in Sec 196 of the Law of Property Act 1925 Ie. recorded or registered delivery.

If the date on the notice is innacurate then the notice is invalid.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you,that was very helpful,things are alot clearer now.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Did i understand that correctly,if i received no notice,they cannot assign to a third party, ie a DCA.

I'm trying to understand but i'm having a hard time grasping this stuff:-(


Thank you lilly for your post,saved for future reference.I will keep reading it untill i understand it correctly.




this is correct


if you do not receive a valid Notice Of Assignment then the debt buyer has no right to collect


eveyone should ask for a valid NOA, especially if they are being taken to court


if no valid NOA exists, the case should be thrown out, as the debt buyer has no right to collect ;)

post office WON 12/11/06


abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON


2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08


alliance and Leicester.WON

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...