Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • not sure about 8, cpr is not compulsory to reply within 7 days cpr is a request, p'haps might be better to refer to the CCA request ...which you seem to have totally omitted..   I have had ****** Loans in the past - i would stick to financial dealings, this i nothing to do with loans.   generally it needs fluffing out a bit, a WS should not simple be a page pulled from a diary.   dx  
    • Fraudsters are using the details of firms we authorise to try to convince people that they work for a genuine, authorised firm. Find out more about this ‘clone firm’. View the full article
    • Hello   I wonder if someone might be able to clarify a problem for me.   I have an old problem raise its head again with cabot finance.   There were 2 bank debts that occurred at the same time that I was unaware off. My Ex wife continued to use a bank account and 2 the debts occurred.   I successfully defended a claim from cabot via MCOL regarding a SB debt 6 years ago. This debt had no previous recovery action on it and therefore SB defence was successful.   It looks like of their parent/sister company (Mortimer Clarke) company issued a CCJ for the other debt in 2011 but the court documents were sent to an address that I no longer lived at and had left 2 years previously so I was unaware of them until I checked my credit report and saw a CCJ on my file. The next time I checked back the CCJ was not showing. I did however manage to obtain a backdated report showing the CCJ recorded.   The CCJ is no longer on my file and no adverse information is showing.   I wrote to Cabot back in 2019 to say that I believed this debt to be statute barred and they wrote to say that as they had obtained a CCJ in 2011 that this was not the case.   The CCJ is no longer showing on my file and calculating that it would have dropped off around 2017 so is it in my interest to try and get this removed from old records? Is it a defence that the court proceedings were sent to an address that I had moved away from 2 years previously or would entering into any such action reignite the CCJ/debt.   I have looked at various comments on the Internet and from what I gather cabot may need to return and get permission to chase the debt ? Is this correct.   I no longer own any assets (other than a car) in the uk as  they are writing to my partners address as she still owns a property there.   Many thanks for reading my post, if anyone has any suggestions to point me in the right direction or confirm my thinking that they are just hoping that I will pay,it would be much appreciated.   do I just ignore them ?    Thanks Dave
    • Hi... well I was a idiot and got a log book loan from car cash point.... if only I knew how underhand and disgusting this company was I would never have done it.  They haven’t been very flexible considering it’s been a global pandemic and I’m a hairdresser so have been off 9 month more or less. So many things they have done must be illegal. They made a arrangement with me on the 20th December 2020 if I paid 300 and then my monthly 110 it would stop repossession, which I did, I had correspondence with them on the 11th say my full balance due on the 18th Feb was £1875.29 even though in earlier correspondence we had changed payment dates to 28th as that’s when I get paid . In the email on the 11th nothing is mentioned about a 3rd party or repossession. On 23rd Feb 2021 8”I get an alert through my insurance my car is moving, I’m in the house , nobody knocked nothing they took my car with all my possessions without the keys and didn’t let me know, if they had I would of been able to try get the funds. 2-3 days I have been arguing with them and the repossession company. They took my car over 40 mins away with my bankcard, shop keys everything in. I managed to borrow the 2000 pound as it had shot up to 2274.29 within days. I went to collect my vehicle yesterday which was another nightmare trying to tell me to wait another 24 hours which I wasn’t they had the money I wanted my car. On getting my vehicle on inspection they have damaged my car, it had a knock above the wheel arch I have proof of it before as I done it getting into work but they have took my paint work down to the metal.you can see it’s where they must of tied it to tow truck. I’m not letting this lie Everything they do is so corrupt me and my solicitor friend are going through everything with a fine tooth comb I’m going to ombudsman and I’ve also wrote to watchdog. I feel very strongly as this  company are nothing but criminals through legal loopholes. Has anyone had any similar experiences with this company and had damage to their vehicle? I think if enough people complain they will get investigated. I feel it was bully boy tactics as I said I would be able to pay hence the arrangement they made with me. 
    • We believe this firm has been providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation. Find out why to be especially wary of dealing with this unauthorised firm and how to protect yourself from scammers. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Help please,howard cohen cpr response, are their documents fraudulent as different to my originals


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4210 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Help urgently needed, following on from another thread as these are cpr and document related and thought it might be better with its own thread

 

Briefly im in court with these clowns of Friday for a case management hearing, the judge had ordered they respond to my AQ and lack of non cpr by 28th july ready for the case management hearing ,

Of course howard cohen didnt comply by the court deadline, but today i have just received a large parcel from them which leaves me hardly any time to prepare.

 

Firstly i still have the original DN from ge money,

the one cohens have just sent me is in my name and everything with correct account numner but is dated a day later than my original,it is also set out slightly different and the arears total is over £100 higher on their version? is this a fraudulent reconstructed document they have supplied, its on GE headed notepaper?

 

The total amount they are claiming for is over £5000, but they are saying they want it heard in the smalls claims court as there are no points of law to adresss?

I thought all claims over 5k couldnt be heard in the small claims court anyway and went to fast or multi track , in any event i want fast track , not small claims .

 

Thay have supplied what they say is a deed of assignment,(there are no actual figures on it )but is signed by the same person for both ge capital and cl finance,says hes a partner in Ozannes

 

Thay are now requesting i now file and serve a fully pleaded defence,and if i dont they request that my defence is struck out and permission be awarded for them to enter judgement accordingly,

 

Theres no way i can get a new defence knocked up before the case management hearing,what do i do now,

 

 

Ps the DN is invalid as no actual date to rectify, jusy withing 14 days of letter etc, and the cca is an application form with no prescribed terms,

 

Any help much appreciated, especially on the dn they have supplied which doesnt match my original

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perverting the course of justice is a pretty serious offence.....I would in the conference firstly ask the person from Cohens to state that the one they sent is an ogirinal of the copy and can they confirm that ??!! Then as if by magic hey presto....you have the original one (was that compliant ?)

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what is stated is my own opinion and from what I have learnt from this forum and my own experiences.

 

DEBT COLLECTION LETTER/SAR/AGREEMENT TEMPLATES ARE HERE - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?65-legislation

 

IF WE HAVE BEEN HELPFUL -PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE A DONATION TO HELP US TO CONTINUE HELPING YOU

 

I AM HAPPY TO RECEIVE PM's AND I WILL RESPOND IF I FEEL I CAN ASSIST BUT WHEN YOU DO CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO COMMENT - THANK YOU

 

IMPORTANT - If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.

Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.

If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon.

 

Forum rules - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 man, no the first one also just said within 21 days to remedy,no actual date ,

 

I guess its a pretty serious offence if its a forged Dn, Its certainly not the same one as my original, fortunately i also have the sars for this account so will dig out the relevant paperwork/entry from the sars too,

 

Hopefully the judge will take this very seriously, and wont be impressed with these 2 different dn"s , if cohens representative says its a copy of the original, where will that leave them seeing as it should be easy enough for me to prove otherwise.

Edited by mak71
Link to post
Share on other sites

The key here is to ask if it is a direct photocopy of the original.....get them to confirm....that it is, then produce the one you've got

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what is stated is my own opinion and from what I have learnt from this forum and my own experiences.

 

DEBT COLLECTION LETTER/SAR/AGREEMENT TEMPLATES ARE HERE - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?65-legislation

 

IF WE HAVE BEEN HELPFUL -PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE A DONATION TO HELP US TO CONTINUE HELPING YOU

 

I AM HAPPY TO RECEIVE PM's AND I WILL RESPOND IF I FEEL I CAN ASSIST BUT WHEN YOU DO CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO COMMENT - THANK YOU

 

IMPORTANT - If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.

Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.

If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon.

 

Forum rules - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 man, yes i will play it very shrewd,and get them to commit before the judge and then show him the original,

 

What could the judge do from there?

also can i insist it doesnt go to small claims as amount is over 5k,

obviuosly howard cohan would prefer smalls claims as they arent as strict on the actual points of law.

 

can the deed of assignement be signed by the same person for both ge money and howard cohen?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Postggj,in their covering letter says " a copy of the relevant extract of the said deed of assignement,

 

Can anyone please help me knock up a new basic defence fro the case management hearing ,or should i just ask the judge for an ajournment seeing as Cohens so rudely ignored the initial deadlines set by the judge and have left me short for time..

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would think with the docs they have it would be quiet easy to get a fast track as the judge is likely to agree with u PF

If I have been of help to you please feel free to click my scales to the left Thanks.:)

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is what I have learnt here and offered as a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

 

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 

CARTER V Co-Op

BANK CHARGES

REFUNDED £3567

 

POMPEYFAITH V Co-Op PPI

OFFER MADE BUT REFUSED

ONGOING AND STILL ONGOING

NOW WITH THE OMBUDSMAN

 

R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just going through all my paper work from cohens, a few weeks ago they sent me a howard cohen headed covering letter about the DN, interestingly they said it was for a different amount than the amount on this knocked up DN they have just sent me, so in total they have sent me 2 different amounts to the original arrears on my original DN,

 

 

How bizzare

Edited by mak71
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all getting very iffy now,something not quiet right,

 

Last night i went through my sars from original cerditor, there was no dn in there,ive just rung up the original creditor who has confirmed in a recorded phone call that they dont keep copies of dn notices on customer files hence the reason it wasnt in the sars.

 

The one cohens have sent me which is different to the original is on ge headed paper dated 2008,with a ge address po box leeds,

 

But the woman from ge has just confirmed ge dont keep copies just dates sent etc ,so this has to be a reconstructed one,but who reconstructed it,ge or cohens?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mak going through the same process as you.

 

I do remember receiving a letter from Santander saying they have taken over GE Money but cant remember when.

 

If we can find that out - I thought it was before your DN but can't be too sure then your DN should be headed Santander not GE Money - in which case Howard Cohens have certainly been economical with the truth here.

 

Can anyone clarify when Santander took over.

 

If it was after your DN then ignore me completely but I have a DN on another account dated 2nd November 2008 from Santander!!!!

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

From GE Money website:

 

On 7th January 2009 GE Capital Bank Limited, which provides GE Money credit cards as well as store finance and auto business, was acquired by Banco Santander SA. As a result GE Capital Bank Limited will be part of the Santander group. This will not affect your account, so please continue to deal with us in exactly the same way.

 

Santander is one of the ten largest banks in the world by market capitalisation with 65 million customers worldwide. In the UK, Santander owns Abbey, Alliance and Leicester and Bradford & Bingley's retail deposit business. GE Money's credit cards, storecard and auto finance business complement Santander's existing Cards and Consumer Finance businesses.

 

GE Money Mortgages & Secured Loans are still managed by GE Money and are not included in the acquisition.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...