Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds


You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds



BankFodder BankFodder


BankFodder BankFodder

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • EU deal replicated 'as far as possible' ... aka less than   "The British Government is continuing to work intensively on securing continuity with other countries. We have secured agreements – either signed or agreed in principle - that account for 64% of the UK’s trade with all the countries with which the UK is seeking continuity, should we leave the EU without a deal."   With what I've seen on that page I linked earlier, that would seem to be decidedly unambitious 'trade deals across the world larger than the EU
    • dx100uk - thank you for your advice.  I will send a SAR to Vanquis and really appreciate all the help on here.   I may have read your last sentence in the way that it was not intended but it has came across very judgmental and not helpful.  I have came on this site for some help, not to be judged.  If that was not your intention then I apologise as I realise text can be read in the way it was not intended.  
    • . I'm sorry but this is not correct. There is a very long established rule that you are required to exercise utmost good faith (uberrima fides) when becoming a party to any kind of insurance contract. This means that you have quite a strict duty to accept responsibility for disclosing any information which a reasonable person in your position might understand could materially affect the risk. I can imagine that the interpretation of this rule would not be applied quite so strictly to a very new and young driver – but the more that one has been driving and the more insurance policies one has held, then I think that the stricter  this rule becomes. It is also well established that one can misrepresent something simply by withholding information – by silence. I'm sorry to say that I think that this rule and the value of it is so self-evident that it is scarcely worth discussing. I wouldn't start raising this issue if I were you with insurers or the courts because you will come away with a bloody nose and loss of credibility
    • @unclebulgaria67 your point is particularly valid especially in regards to loss in the event of a claim. Irrespective of 2x SP30’s or not the vehicle is insured for its full market value. The insurers rating changes based on risk against those endorsements, where said risk calculation isn’t made available.    Also I question the validation of 22% in premium. Is that based on today’s risk profiling, or is that applied retrospectively to day 1 and can that be evidenced.    One thing that is very clear, is that to bring about any degree of misrepresentation the insurer has to have evidence that questions were asked in regards to the endorsements.   This was an auto renewal and when I’ve checked the Brokers electronic Copy on “My Policy’ at renewal, there is no section included relative to accidents in the last 5 yrs or Motoring convictions. Everything else relative to me and the named driver is listed. 
    • Here is what exposes Johnson & Co Commission document, makes for sober reading   Wonder if Snake Oil Singham has read and digested it?   https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/com_2020_324_2_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_0.pdf
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies

Parking Bay query

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3985 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts



I live in a block of apartments in the centre of Sheffield which has no parking facilities for residents so therefore it's a case of park where you can on the streets.

There is a small parking bay at the back of our building which is intended for a possible retail unit on the ground floor (the shop-space has never been developed and is boarded up) so people use that when there is a space free in it. There are no restriction signs in the space except for a blue one saying 'BAY FOR SERVICING RETAIL UNIT ONLY' and signs from UKPC stuck at various places on our building. There are also no markings whatsoever in or around the bay except double yellow lines on the road.


The bay is in the right of the picture below (sorry there's not much of the bay in view, was a picture I took to show the double yellows originally but you get the idea)




We've lived here over 6 months and have never had any issues until recently when I'm guessing the council has employed some over-zealous jobsworth CEO anxious to bump his figures up.

We've had two parking tickets recently, both from the same CEO and both for contravention '01 - parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours'.

I successfully appealed against the first on grounds that the double yellow lines are invalid but want something more to cover my back if they get stroppy with me and reject the next appeal and try and drag the whole thing out.


Basically, what, if any, contraventions can they get me under for parking here?

Would you class it as a private bay/on private property so they actually have no jurisdiction over it?

The street has always had traffic wardens handing out tickets (parking on yellow lines, in a pay-and-dispay without a ticket etc) but never when you parked in this space before, which seems to indicate the rest of them think there's no point trying to do you for anything...


Any help greatly appreciated. Thanks! ;)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry photo shows nothing it just looks like you are parked on the footway in a restricted street?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, will try and get another pic at soon as.

If you look there's a bricked/paved area (where the car is parked in the middle of) that's marked with a series of bollards around the edge; that's the bay. The whole thing is kind of 'D' shape distinguished from the pavement. The pavement runs between the bay and our building (the white building in the top right)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest, on what basis did you say the yellow lines were invalid?


If it were me, I would be talking to the council, not about the PCNs but about the restrictions. What does the Road Traffic Order state? What is the bay for? If it's for parking, why are yellow lines running alongside it? Has there been an amnesty for vehicles parked in the bay and is it still effective?


The more info you can glean, the better placed you'll be to determine whether the PCNs are enforceable, and how to approach your appeal.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The double yellows don't have termination bars, they just run under a speed bump and come out the other side as single yellows.


It looks like the bay was designed to be a parking space for delivery vans etc if there was a shop at the bottom of our building. The shop space is boarded up and has never been developed so the space has never been used for it's original purpose.

In the letter I received from the council in reply to my first appeal they merely stated at the end "The sign clearly states the lay-by is for servicing retail unit only"

Edited by ff81

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the lack of T-bar will win you an appeal by itself. It's fairly widely known that yellow lines should terminate properly, but provided the lines are clear it tends to be treated as trivial and not grounds for cancellation. Not heard of one going under a speed bump before though... wonder what would happen if you parked on the speed bump itself?


I have a hunch that the council letter is partly a fob-off. All lines and restrictions are defined legally in the local Road Traffic Order. Regardless of what the sign says, it is here that the true parking regulations are written, and the council can advise on that.


Is that what the sign says? For "Servicing retail unit only"? Sounds odd to me. Do you have a pic?


Like I say, I would research a little with the council as to why DYL exist alongside a parking bay (if that's what it is). How for example would a Parking Attendant know if a vehicle was there while "servicing a retail unit"? It just sonuds strange.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help, will try and get some more pics when I've got hold of a camera later

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...