Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help appreciated re deposit being withheld


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I moved out from my rented property 2 weeks ago today. The estate agent came around on the day of the move and said that all was in order and that I will get my deposit back. However, the landlord then came to do an inspection as he was over on a visit from Dubai (where he lives and works at the moment) and has said that he will not authorise release of my deposit due to things he thinks should be rectified ie small marks on walls/carpets ie wear and tear.

 

When I moved in, there were LOADS of marks on the walls and carpets and I documented the major ones in the inventory. Also on the day I moved in, I had to move OUT lots of rubbish/rotten food left behind by the owners (landlord and his family) before I could move in. The estate agent who came on the day of my moving in acknowledged that the place was disgustingly dirty and she had even had to hoover mountains of rabbit hair out of the rooms before she could even show the property to prospective tenants.

 

The estate agents told me that the LL was contesting my deposit and was told to leave it 2 weeks to find out what his issues were and how much he wanted. I've done that and the LL still hasn't said to the estate agent what he wants from my deposit. The estate agent has asked me to leave it another 5 days and then say that my whole deposit is in dispute (it's held by the TDS). However, how long do I have to keep leaving it? I have never had any problems getting my deposit back from rented property and the house was far cleaner when I left than when I moved in. The estate agent thinks the LL is going for betterment, which I know is illegal. Also, the property has now been taken over by a family of 6 (4 kids) so there will already no doubt be extra marks on the carpets and walls since I moved out.

 

What can I do to get my money back? £725 of mine is being held and i want it back. The LL is in Dubai and not responding to emails from the estate agent asking how much he is wanting out of my deposit. I really need the money and the whole issue is getting to me now.

 

Sorry for the long post and I'd really appreciate any advice you can offer.

 

Karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't mention proper checkin inventory signed by you? nor does the agent's cursory inspection amount to a check out.

 

Contact TDS and ask them what is going on - they are very helpful. Do not wait around.

 

Tell the agent that you will resist ALL attempts to retain ANY of the deposit and if necessary will take it to court/arbitration. Judges/arbitrators really don't like landlords who act in this way.

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was given an inventory when I moved in, which I amended with the major marks and carpet damage, signed and handed back to the estate agent within a couple of days of me moving in. Does this constitute a proper check-in inventory?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello, sorry to bump this but i really would appreciate advice on what i do next. The landlord hasn't contacted the estate agent to say exactly how much money he wants to fix the problems he has dreamt up - does he have a certain amount of days to respond? Can I write a letter to the agent citing 'legally, he must respond within x days or I get all my deposit back'??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, i realised that my deposit is with the DPS, not the TDS. I looked on the DPS website and it says that me and the landlord have to fill in a joint form stating the dispute and then they will go from there with the ADS service (I think that's what it's called, its their adjudication service). However, if the landlord isn't responding about the amount he wants to dispute, I don't see him filling in the required forms for the adjudication..

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is that the agent protected this deposit and not the LL.

 

You can go into the DPS site and instigate the return of your deposit yourself.

 

There is something called the single claim route, which I use if tenants do a bunk without informing us.

I've never known this to be used by a tenant but I'm sure it could be in this case.

 

Firstly find out who deposited your bond, agent or LL.

Call the DPS or go online and instigate a repayment.

Check out the single claim route with the DPS and see if it can be used the other way around, i.e. by the tenant.

 

Be interesting to see what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update and further info needed please. I went on the DPS website to request return of my deposit. As the agent protected the deposit, they denied return (via DPS) of said deposit. LL has now said he wants to withold £380 of my deposit for things that the agent classes as 'wear and tear' and they have admitted this to me (unfortunately not in writing). The LL also wants to claim for a new lawn mower, even though this is not on the inventory - is this allowed? I mowed the lawn the day I moved out and it worked then. However, I'm tempted to say I never used their lawnmower but that my dad came and mowed the lawn just so they can't lay the blame on me because I definitely didn't break it!

 

The LL is also claiming for a gardener to come in and put the garden back as was. As was is overgrown! The house was up for rent for months before I moved in so it had long grass and loads of junk in the garden - the estate agent has photographs she took when I moved in to prove this. So..can the LL claim for gardening to be done? And can I legally request all photographs that the agent took for my own use?

 

The agent said that they would try to mediate initially but then it would go to the DPSs arbitration service if we could not reach an amicable agreement. Am I better off going direct to the free arbitration service provided by DPS?

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 12,

Gosh you are in a pickle aren't you.

 

I can't make out whether you've instigated the return of your deposit or not so could you please clarify this.

You say the agent deposited it?? Regardless of who deposited it you should have had written confirmation of this within 14 days of you giving it to them so go to the agent and tell them that you didn't receive this and of course unless ALL your deposit is refunded directly you will take action against them / LL to reclaim 3x the dposit for not correctly instructing you as to it's whereabouts.

 

I don't understand this statement below!! Could you explain it please.

 

"As the agent protected the deposit, they denied return (via DPS) of said deposit"

With regard to the Lawnmower, I wouldn't even enter into this, it wasn't on the inventory to start so regardless of it's condition now there's no proof that there was one left there when you moved in so how can they request a new one?

 

I'm unaware of your agents practice but when we take photographs of properties for check in then the tenant gets a copy of them also on a disc. If the agent has them then request they email them to you. Why shouldn't they? If they refuse just say "ok no worries, I will give all your information to the arbitration service and they can request these from you directly"

If/When you put your case together for arbitration you can put in there that the agent has got photos but has refused to pass them onto you to support your case.

 

And finally, if the answer to the above ? is yes, you HAVE instigated the return of your bond already with the DPS then you have no need to deal with the agents any further and their offer of mediation is a useless one as the process has already started.

If however you HAVEN'T started this then forget the agent and just do it! You're just wasting time batting this back and forth, let the ADR sort it out. Chances are you will win this anyway because remember that it's down to the Landlrod to prove that you have not looked after a property or indeed left it in an undesirable condition, how is this possible if they haven't got a good enough inventory or photos that back up this argument?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for responding, Just4Let. When I say that the agent protected my deposit, I mean that when I paid my deposit they lodged it with the DPS and sent me all the relevant info so they have operated all above board so far. I'm still waiting for the letter from them (the agent) with the exact details of what the landlord wants to withhold the money for as they have only told me verbally so far. I hope to get the letter today and once I have it, I'll start the dispute via DPS and avoid the agents offer of a mediation service because it's pointless really isn't it? Even if they SAY they think the landlord is a nutter and I've been a perfect tenant, it's the LL paying their wages at the end of the day....:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've instigated the full return, the DPS sent me an email saying it has been declined. I then got another email saying that the LL wants to withhold £380 and do I accept or decline this. Of course I've declined. So now I've mailed the DPS, asked for a copy of their JDR form (both me and the LL have to fill this form in pre using their ADR service) so I can start the process.

 

Apols for the wages comment - it's just what the agent keeps telling me...'we work for him, he pays our wages etc etc'. I know you're not all the same, thank goodness

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lia - I doubt it's the same LL - his initials are JK and the property is in W Yorks. It was his own house before he went to work in Dubai which is why is he thinks I'm going to completely redecorate it for him with my deposit. He will have a shock after his new tenants move out - they are a couple with 4 kids!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...