Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS and wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided?. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

King vs Egg Credit Card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4983 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm in the process of trying to reclaim credit card charges from Egg and have been helped by this thread.

 

The bigger issue for me (as the account balance is in the 10k range) is whether the CCA is enforceable and if not what I can do about. I gather from my reading on the forum that it might well be a dud. It looks quite like the document in this guy's thread.

 

Do we think this is unenforceable? If it's not what would a reasonable outcome be?

 

th_EggCCAp1anon.jpg

 

th_EggCCAp2anon.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've sent Egg what should be the final letter about charges (based on this) and had a charming reply saying they won't budge and that I am entitled to complain to the FSO. The key paragraph is:

 

"In line with the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) investigation into default charges the charges incurred are a genuine pre-estimate of the loss caused to Egg when a customer breaks the terms of their agreement".

 

My letter to them had already stated:

 

"If your charges are indeed a genuine pre-estimate of the administrative costs likely to be incurred by you in dealing with defaults then in order to reassure me that your penalties really do reflect your costs, I request that you provide me with a breakdown and proof of all costs involved with regard to your actual or liquidated losses involved in any breach of contract to which these charges relate with yourselves and that these charges reflect your true costs in relation to the said charges and are proportionate to the charges levied on my account as defined in Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 Schedule 2 (e). "

 

so my guess is that they didn't actually read my letter nor do they have any intention of refunding me.

 

Did anyone look at my CCA and do they think it's enforceable or not? (I know these are seperate issues, but if I'm not getting any joy with regard to bank charges I need to try a different tactic!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS It's interesting that they're treating this as "Your complaint" whereas in fact it's a claim based on a point of law :/ I'm not complaining, I'm telling them they owe me money and asking them to pay it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Egg managers know the Moc1982 template letter by heart after receiving it for 2.5 years -- Egg paid out without exception, to some immediately, to others with more delay not unrelated to the wooliness of the text they received. When you rephrased it the crispness was lost, and it looked like a new letter.

 

The letter you received was not composed by a human and does not reflect a human decision, but just another one of the standard templates printed off the computer in volume whenever specified by a clerk for one of their 2 million cardholders.

 

Check back in the Egg Forum -- another person received an identical text. Ignoring Egg's "Final" position he reiterated his own final position, namely to see you in court, with legal papers to be served in one week and the extra cost to be reclaimed from you. Egg paid in full. It is your case to run as you choose.

 

Good luck.

Edited by Mistermind

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mistermind! I only rephrased it to reflect my circumstances, i.e. they have offered me nothing whereas the person who wrote the letter had been offered a partial refund. I suspect they didn't read past the first paragraph anyway ;)

 

I'll have to think about your advice as we're talking "only" £200 out of a 10k account and I'm not sure it's worth going to court over. If I threaten to see them in court I have to mean it, of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Chris. I've spent most of the weekend reading the forum and whilst I can find lots of debate about whether Egg agreements are enforceable or not (thanks for the links btw) I don't see many examples of people being successful against Egg and to be honest I haven't a clue what I should do next :(

 

The situation in brief:

I've been making token payments for over a year. CCA was received early in 09. Case is being handled by a DCA. Charges reclaim has been fruitless.

 

I'm thinking my options are to sit tight and continue with the the token payments for now, or make a (low) F&F offer. Otherwise if I don't get some of these bigger debts cleared soon I might have to consider bankruptcy.

 

Any thoughts or advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we're saying it's unenforceable because of those issues, right?

 

If it were me, I'd concentrate on the enforceable debts, as those come above this.

 

Paul is more over these Egg agreements than I - I'll see if I can grab his attention.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is the DCA?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Tried making a low F&F with money from a relative but all its done is woken DLC up and now they're hassling me again. I'm just gonna sit tight for a while and make my agreed payments while I decide what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

DLC wrote to me in November saying that they "need" me to increase my payments and threatening to withdraw my "instalment rights". I haven't paid them since November, so they wrote again in December saying I'm behind with my payments. They've also asked several times for an SOA. This is pretty much routine now, a letter per month.

 

Should I just sit tight? Should I send an SOA? Should I make an payment? Is there anything else I can do? The debt is nearly 10k and is 20% of what I owe. I know the CCA may be dodgy but I don't feel at all comfortable about challenging it in the current climate.

Edited by king123
Addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Account got passed to ARC and I've been receiving threatening letters from Trevor Munn. Have made a token payment, but really don't know what to do now. Is there any mileage in challenging the CCA or would it be better to just carry on making token payments and hope they go away/get bored?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

The latest on this is that ARC are collecting for Egg, and they've offered me a 40% discount. They are offering on behalf of Egg to mark the account partially settled and with a balance of nil and to not pursue me any further.

 

Just posting this an update for anyone who subbed, don't really need any advice on it.

 

Would be tempting if this were my only debt to borrow the money off my parents. As it currently stands I owe Egg 10k out of a total debt of 42k. I can't lay out nearly 6k and still have 36k debt left, would be better to go bust! However I think I'll bring forward my plan to write again to all creditors offering say 20%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The amount you can hope to settle for is going to depend on all sorts of factors such as the age and size of the debt, your current income, how many DCAs it has to been to etc. I don't want to reveal the specific percentage I paid at this point but I will say it was well below 50%. If you need more help please start your own thread and post a link to it here :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...