Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • EU deal replicated 'as far as possible' ... aka less than   "The British Government is continuing to work intensively on securing continuity with other countries. We have secured agreements – either signed or agreed in principle - that account for 64% of the UK’s trade with all the countries with which the UK is seeking continuity, should we leave the EU without a deal."   With what I've seen on that page I linked earlier, that would seem to be decidedly unambitious 'trade deals across the world larger than the EU
    • dx100uk - thank you for your advice.  I will send a SAR to Vanquis and really appreciate all the help on here.   I may have read your last sentence in the way that it was not intended but it has came across very judgmental and not helpful.  I have came on this site for some help, not to be judged.  If that was not your intention then I apologise as I realise text can be read in the way it was not intended.  
    • . I'm sorry but this is not correct. There is a very long established rule that you are required to exercise utmost good faith (uberrima fides) when becoming a party to any kind of insurance contract. This means that you have quite a strict duty to accept responsibility for disclosing any information which a reasonable person in your position might understand could materially affect the risk. I can imagine that the interpretation of this rule would not be applied quite so strictly to a very new and young driver – but the more that one has been driving and the more insurance policies one has held, then I think that the stricter  this rule becomes. It is also well established that one can misrepresent something simply by withholding information – by silence. I'm sorry to say that I think that this rule and the value of it is so self-evident that it is scarcely worth discussing. I wouldn't start raising this issue if I were you with insurers or the courts because you will come away with a bloody nose and loss of credibility
    • @unclebulgaria67 your point is particularly valid especially in regards to loss in the event of a claim. Irrespective of 2x SP30’s or not the vehicle is insured for its full market value. The insurers rating changes based on risk against those endorsements, where said risk calculation isn’t made available.    Also I question the validation of 22% in premium. Is that based on today’s risk profiling, or is that applied retrospectively to day 1 and can that be evidenced.    One thing that is very clear, is that to bring about any degree of misrepresentation the insurer has to have evidence that questions were asked in regards to the endorsements.   This was an auto renewal and when I’ve checked the Brokers electronic Copy on “My Policy’ at renewal, there is no section included relative to accidents in the last 5 yrs or Motoring convictions. Everything else relative to me and the named driver is listed. 
    • Here is what exposes Johnson & Co Commission document, makes for sober reading   Wonder if Snake Oil Singham has read and digested it?   https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/com_2020_324_2_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_0.pdf
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
Misteeq

First Plus - Lumping Interest Up Front on Settlement

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3973 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm new on here after being recommended by a friend.

 

Just wondering if anyone has had dealings with First Plus?

 

Its a long story, but basically, I took out a loan with them in 2006, and then after 24 months settled it early and my settlement figure was nearly £2,000.00 MORE than the initial loan that I took out. I had repaid them over £3,000.00 during the 24 months that I had the loan, which they seemed to have failed to take into account when calculating my settlement figure.

 

I have been fighting with them for over eight months and every letter they send back to me quotes different figures to what I actually signed up for.

 

Has anyone else had dealings with First Plus? They really are an absolute nightmare and I would advise anyone to stay well clear of them.

 

What are the chances of getting my money back?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of info will be found by googling firstpluscomplaints

 

If they used the Rule of 78, which they should not have then it is likely you were penalised too heavily.

 

Ask them for full disclosure on the s/f charge.

 

There are a lot of issues out there with FP and they are trading with difficulty at the moment so every penny gained from a customer is a penny less that they have lost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark for your reply.

 

I will try what you have suggested as I am determined to try to get back some of my money. The initial loan was for £12,000.00 and I repaid over £3,000.00 over 24 months. When I asked for a copy of my settlement figure, they had lumped almost £39,000.00 up front for the interest! God knows where they had plucked this figure from as it is certainly not mentioned anywhere in my credit agreement.

 

They also fail to take into account my repayments of over £3,000.00 in their settlment figure.

 

I would never ever go near First Plus again and would advise anyone who is thinking of taking out a loan with them to think twice.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

How can I find out if my First Plus Loan was settled using the Rule 78?

 

I've checked all my paperwork, and the Agreement that was dated January 2006 (the date that I initially took out the loan) states that if I settle early then they will settle under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

However, when I received a letter last week asking how my settlement figure was calculated in February 2008, it stated they had calculated it based on the Consumer Credit Act (Early Settlement Figure) 2004.

 

Which one is correct? Does anyone know?

 

This is such a frustrating situation as from what I have read on this forum and other forums, First Plus really do like to rip people off. As stated above in my previous post, surely it is not correct that my settlement figure, after paying over £3,000.00 back to them over 24 months, was almost £2,000.00 MORE than the initial loan.

 

Where do I go from here? First Plus seem to have backed me into a corner with this one.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First Plus are no longer offering loans, they are only surviving due to support from Barclays and are being investigated on many fronts ranging from the misselling of PPI to the fairness (or not ) of their interest rate clause. They have a provision of £8m in their accounts that they expect to have to pay to successful PPI complainees.

 

Re settlements, you are lucky in that your loan was regulated so they cannot do anything other than follow specific guidelines for settlement. Standard calculations would show ALL the interest due to the end of the loan then rebate what is allowable under the caluclation.

 

As you were relatively early in your loan in terms of settlement then it is standard in how interest is apportioned that you would not have cleared off that much capital in 2 yrs. That said, the settlement figure quoted does seem excessive. Have you spoken directly to them? Louisa Jane Hart is one of their remaining people and whilst she obviously tows the party line, it does not detract from her being able to help 02920905507 is her number. Ask for full statement and breakdown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

I have no direct involvement with FP but check out my thread called Swift advances PLC and in terms of nightmare early settlement calculations Swift make FP look like pussycats!

Swift do use the Rule of 78 ( I took my loan out in 2003) but this is being removed in May 2010 as part of an overhaul of the regulations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...