Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

welcome finance - problems !


pinklily0105
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

been reading up o the OFT website, and it doesn't seem to look good for the cooling of period. It does say that if on trade premises then the cooling of period doesn't apply:confused:

 

whether this is different for a secured loan i don't know

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

waiting for my SAR but really wanting to get my complaint in with welcome, in case they go under first.

 

but if i complain now and mention this before they have sent out my SAR, will i be giving them a heads up on what im up to ? They might doctor their records ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

rung rang a few places today, spoke to consumer direct and national debtline.

 

There is no cooling off period if signed on trade premises. However, we should have been given an advanced copy of the agreement 7 days prior, of which time welcome should not have any contact. Unless we request to them, that this period be made shorter.

 

The problem is that this would not definatly make this agreement unenforcable. It would have to go to court and it would be up to the judge on the day. And although the agreement wasn't exceuted properly, if the judge didn't think this would change the outcome; being that even if we had of received the contract 7 days prior we still would have still taken out the loan. Then they will go in welcome's favour an enforce the loan. Meaning that we could then be made liable for all costs including welcomes.

 

They seemed to think that this was a very risky angle to take, and we would just be better to persue missold ppi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just received back my sar from welcome. It includes the details from the secured loan, plus one personal loan not the any off the others.

 

There is a letter in it that says that we have the advanced copy of the loan and the charge agreement to look over. There is no copy of the advanced agreement just this letter, but we have never seen it before. But then how would we prove we never got that ?

 

The ppi is on both loans, so we can go after that because on all the loans we were sold we were told that it would have to be taken out in order for us to get the credit.

 

On their loans figures on the personal loan, it does look like they have applied a credit for insurance becuase we have paid it off early, but I can't see a credit for the loan being paid off early. In fact it looks like we have been charged an interest amount for paying it off early.

 

Not sure what else im looking for on this, is there anything else i should be looking for ?

 

Any help would be much appreciated, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you specifically ask for screen shots? I'd have thought thae info on that would be pretty much covered under their Customer Notes dump from the files anyways. I have a few pages of those.

 

Need to look at early settlement penalties, as I have likewise been charged. Not sure of the legalities, but certainly no mention of it in any of the terms and conditions so far. And I would have thought it would need to be in there, otherwise, you haven't agreed to that. Maybe.

 

Great fun this, innit? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

been looking through the t&c's on the personal loan, no mention of early settlement penalties ! No surprises there then hey ?!

 

anyway as regards my SAR wondering if another letter should be sent in that they have failed to give all info ? The other loans are with the 6 year period so am I right, it is the law they have to provide that ?

 

Also as regards to my secured loan, I have a list of times when welcome have accessed my account for example :

 

04/04/2008 arrangement made

02/10/2008 check account

05/12/2008 outbound call

 

is this satisfactory info, or should each entry have more details, such as a telephone transcript, or a computer shot ? Wouldn't have a clue what "arrangement made" would mean. Account has never been in arrears. Just wondering if I could get more information, rather than just a list.

Edited by pinklily0105
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry still not great with photobucket !

 

Anyway for really hoping Post could look at this. This is the personal loan we had with welcome before taking out our secued loan, which in turn paid this above off early.

 

You had previously said to me to check the correct rebates had been applied. It looks like we have been charged to pay this off early in the terms of "settlement penalty interest "

 

I can't find anything in the t&c"s off the loan reagrding this, can they do this ?

 

Just wanted any clarification on this because the end figure has then been transferred onto my secured loan with the cash advance we had, just wanted to make sure all figures we're as they should be !

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you have your answer to begin with

 

no, welcome can not charge early settlement interest unless its on the agreement under the termination rights or in the t&c

 

this will call the secured loan into question

 

 

now dont quote me on this, strictly off the cuff

why do you think this happens

 

its because things like commission payments etc. the welcome staff get will have to be paid back by the staff member

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...