Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Council Confirm

 

Origional Debt £110.39

Court Fees: £68.00

Total: £178.39

 

Equita Fees £42.50

Total £220.89

 

No bailiff Vists at all, just this letter sent received via Royal Mail

 

does anyone know anything about the return address on the back of the envelope?

 

Data Services Centre, Department E, Doncaster, DN55 1ES

 

Equita have said to the council that they have made two Bailiff Visits.

 

however i have a recorded call from the Peterboroigh City Council

 

Saying, that equita immediately add an amount of £42.50 to the account

 

then when we visit the council today they say that the two bailiff visits where

 

27th July and 3rd August 2009

 

Yet, i have another recorded telephone call with Equita today confirming that the fees are for

 

a Letter for an amount of about £11.00 and if payment is not made within 7 days of that letter another fee is added to the account making a total of £42.50

 

Equita confirm that NO Bailiff visits have been made, the fees are for letters.

 

This stinks of fraud but the council dont seem to want to help.

 

 

What the council admited today by mistake was

 

they receieved a letter from my sister in-law with an offer of payment, but failed to reply to it. but insted passed the account to the courts and Equita.

 

I think they have really shot them selfs in the foot here

 

I reckon i have a case under Section 2 of the fraud act 1996

 

Section 2 of the act says

 

2 Fraud by false representation

 

(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a)dishonestly makes a false representation, and

(b)intends, by making the representation—

(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

 

 

Equita try to enforce payment of £42.50 which they know they cant legally claim under the Council Tax Administration Act.

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

what i need guys, is your input on this and for any info you may have on

 

Data Services Centre, Department E, Doncaster, DN55 1ES

 

Peterborough City Councils - List of Costs ( This is taken from my archive fileing system when i was personally involved with the same council and Equita.

 

This case is the same as my case over a year ago, which i won.

 

 

costs.jpg

 

 

Oh and i forgot to say, that Peterborough City Council have not done the required actions

 

1. did not send a copy of the Liability Order from the court

2. Reply to offer letter of monthly repayments -

3. did not give 14 days warning letter before transferring the account to Equita.

 

Sister in-law is not working at the moment and is in receipt of ESA, again this was mentioned on the offer of payment letter, which the council today have confirmed they have this on the system from her letter.

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t want to put any recorded telephone calls on here for people to listen too as i got a snotty letter from Equitas solicitors before when i was involved with them last year. but i have sent them off to the council to listen to and hopefully take action.

 

 

Also just played back one of the recordings when Equita say about there charges of £42.50

 

He said they charge about £11 or £12 for the letter and if payment is not made within 7 days then extra fees are added to make it a total of £42.50

 

Well the letter is dated 03/08/09 and received today 10/08/09

so it some how took 7 Days to get to my sister in-law and bang was not able to make a payment offer within the 7 days lol

 

Peterborough Council say to us both, that she needs to make a payment to Equita, i said well Equita allocate the payments towards there fees first before they send any money of the council.

 

The council said, well thats what you must do, pay them direct. i said, that dont make sence, you want her to make payment to a company acting in breach of the law???? they said yes.

 

Why cant the council play fair. i wanted the council to allow us to use there phone while we call Equita and try and dispute the fees and find out what they are for and so the Council could hear what they say on lound Speaker Phone as i knew Equita would say no bailiffs have been around and that its for letters only.

 

- Guess what there response was. Sorry i am not prepaid to witness that, i will make it noted that i denied your request.

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

thats because they hope you you will go away :rolleyes:

 

perhaps you should send them a copy of

 

 

Statutory Instrument 1992 No. 613

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

 

SCHEDULE 5 Regulation 45(2)(b)

 

CHARGES CONNECTED WITH DISTRESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

{Update}

All the telephone recordings and letters have been sent to the Council and the LGO.

 

So for the council have contacted Equita asking for more information.

 

I know whats going to happen.

 

Equita GPS devices are going to do there majic once again, and that is provde a fake print out.

 

Just happens to be on this case. one of the days Equita Claim to have visited was the date on the Letter that was received yesterday which had a date of 03/08/09 - the same day they claim to have visited, however one BIG mistake was this letter arrived in a envelope with a franked stamp on it with a postal Licence number.

 

 

-------------

right i have a copy

 

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 (No. 613) - Statute Law Database

 

 

is there any other provisons within the act that can be used againts the Council?

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter was signed (Bailiff Manager) lol

 

not been able to find out the bailiffs name yet as when we called Equita they said no bailiff had been assiged to the case yet.

 

but there fees of £42.50 have been added to the account

 

even they say they can charge £42.50 for a letter :) :) :)

 

Fraud or what

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

remind them that only a certificated bailiff can add charges not office staff

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/ex345.pdf

 

Certificated bailiffs — enforce a variety of debts on behalf of organisations such as local authorities. They can seize and sell your goods to cover the amount of the debt you owe. They also hold a certificate, which enables them, and them alone, to levy distress for rent, road traffic debts, council tax and non-domestic rates

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an idea, why don't i apply to the county court for an

detailed assessment of the fees charged by Equita this would allow us to actually say to the Judge that no visits where made. He should then ask Equita for evidance. Unless they use photoshop or something like that, there will be no evidence and Equita will be forced to refund the fees to the account.

 

Peterborough City Council would then have no option but to ensure this does not happen again

 

This will then open them to a can of worms. :)

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the info, i am fully aware of the complaints procedure, ive been there before with Equita and Peterborough City Council.

 

Ive made it a simple process of CC the LGO in on any emails to and from the council, and the council have started doing the same.

 

 

This time i'm doing it for my sister in-law

 

Would the Police take the case on as per S2 fraud Act 1996?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the Council make a profit then from the court fee. Surely the fee should be the same with all the courts.

 

I have just sent an email to the court

 

From: Dave

Sent: 11 August 2009 11:15

To: '[email protected]'

Subject: Council Tax

Hi Jen

Could you please advise me of the current court fee that is normally payable when Peterborough City Council file a claim with your self for non-payment of council tax.

I need the information to make sure the Council are not over charging.

Dave

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just checked with one of my previous cases and the court fee was £50

 

so its gone up £18 in two years.

 

If i get a response back from the court, and its proved that the council are making a profit, then i will file a claim for damages.

 

Surely they can only charge for administration costs.

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

{UPDATE}

 

Peterborough City Council has now listened to my recorded telephone calls.

 

 

Outcome

 

  • agreed to remove over £100 from the balance ( compensation)
  • has agreed to take the case back from Equita
  • Do a full investigation into Equita
  • Training given to the individual council employee

 

I asked the manager about the court fees of £68. He confirmed it only costs the council £3.00 for each court order. The rest is the Councils agreed admin fees. However due to the size of the debt £110.39 the court fees will be removed.

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...