Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard/Mercers - CCA/Application Form


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5315 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Just god rid of Cohens (strike out) and time for a new battle with these lot. Balance about £400, had card for about 3 years. I have been ignoring Mercers for a couple of weeks and received letter from them Friday. Answered my mobile to them in error tonight!

 

Told the woman that I would be requesting CCA (she tried to convince me I wanted the application form). Told her that under CCA 1974 that I was entitled to a full copy of the original agreement. She said send to Barclaycard and she would diary for a week.

 

She did contradict herself by saying that they themselves should provide when i questioned her.

I plan on sending request to Mercers

 

Any thoughts out there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shadow

 

I sent £1 P/O to B/Cd with letter requesting cca for my barclaycard and they cashed P/O but only sent me current T/C.

What shall I do now, send them account in dispute letter, deadline was 1st August 2009.

 

 

Ang

 

Ok you have a couple of options...

 

Either issue a CPR 31.16 letter for the CCA and send to mercers, its likely they'll ignore but you never know.

 

Write back stating thats not enforceable and you'll not pay until they show the actual executed agreement. I'll look for a template letter thats used often on here......

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok this one would fit the bill...

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/582-possible-letter-when-a-questionable-agreementapplication-is-sent

 

 

But also this one (this is the one I'd send personally)...

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account Number: XXX

 

Re; your recent reply to my request under section 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

I note that you have replied to the above by sending a copy of your companies current Terms and conditions I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

This breach of the agreement can be demonstrated as follows;

 

As you will know section 180(1) (b) authorises, “the omission from a copy of certain material from the original, or the inclusion of certain material in condensed form.” This refers to statutory instruments made under the heading Copies of document regulations and in this care in particular to SI 1983/1557.

 

Before leaving section 180 there are two other sections that should be remembered these are:

 

Section 2(2) (a) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not satisfied unless the copy supplied is in the prescribed form and conforms to the prescribed requirements;

 

And more importantly

 

Section 2(b) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not infringed by the omission of any material, or its inclusion in condensed form, if that is authorised by regulations.

 

You will see that this quite clearly states that whilst certain items may be left out of the copy document the rest of the document must be in the form and contain all items as prescribed by the regulations.

 

Turning to the regulations regarding what may be omitted from these copies these are contained with SI 1983/1557.

 

The regulations state:

(2) There may be omitted from any such copy-

(a) any information included in an executed agreement, security instrument or other document relating to the debtor, hirer or surety or included for the use of the creditor or owner only which is not required to be included therein by the Act or any Regulations thereunder as to the form and content of the document of which it is a copy;

(b) any signature box, signature or date of signature (other than, in the case of a copy of a cancelable executed agreement delivered to the debtor under section 63(1) of the Act, the date of signature by the debtor of an agreement to which section 68(b) of the Act applies);

 

It is quite clear what can be omitted from the copy document, this again asserts that all other details of the agreement should presented in form and content as required by the regulations.

 

The requirements of the Agreement regulations 1983/1553 are very explicit in describing the form and content of an agreement and this as I have demonstrated also applies to the copy of any such agreement with the above mentioned proviso.

 

Nowhere within these regulations does it state that part of the agreement can be presented on a separate document headed terms and conditions.

It does state that all terms and conditions should be within the agreement document and is explicit of the form in which it is presented.

 

I hope this explains why your reply was unacceptable I await a True copy of my agreement and would remind you again that whilst the request has not been complied with the default continues

 

Yours faithfully

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mercers will send you T&C's even if you do use CPR. They will then pass it to the next desk in the BC office (Calders) and then eventually will sell it to a DCA.

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rusty

 

Yes that's the address I have used.

 

Big Andy - what is the final ouitcome usually on these, are they enforceable?

 

Barclaycard are famous for using application forms as if they were the real deal. So no, highly unlikely to be enforcable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been there and done it with Barclaycard, all they could provide me with was an application form, went to court requested the original credit agreement which they could not produce only the application form, It was thrown out, so stick with it they have to prove they can enforce the debt and they will have to provide the correct documents to do so, which i doubt they can do. Just stick with it.

 

PECKY1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all

 

Well I have received a document titled 'These are the terms and conditions of an agreement between us" A second page is a photocoped terms and conditions document from 2005 (my card taken out in 2006).

 

Made the mistake of answering a Mercers call last weekend and told they do not have to supply a copy of the agreement as doesn't apply to credit cards. She put my account on hold for 7 days as I had received their 'CCA' the same day!

 

I have just sent the dispute letter.

 

Lets see what Mercers have to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all

 

Two letters from BC this week. The first offering me 'free money' If I make payment of £43 they will credit account with additional £27 and one or two other cominations. I will ignore at present.

 

They have responded to my dispute letter with a 3 pager as to why they complied with my CCA request - seen it before on some of the other threads.

 

Wat is the next step? BC say they will continue with collection proceedures. Mercers have been ringing my mobile but I just ignore them.

 

Di I need to respond or just sit back and wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All

 

I must be one of those rare ones that received a doorstep visit - from Scotcall of all people.

 

Anyway she parked in my spot just as I was coming down the road. I parked behind her and went in ignoring her. Not my fault she can't get out. ;)

 

I did eventually open the door, took a brown envelope off her and told her I would read and be back out after I had considered the content. Fifteen minutes later opened the door and said in writing only as I don't conduct my business at the door.:D I did agree to move my car though. She had been there 40 minutes by this time.

 

Followed up with letter telling them the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...