Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

County Court Claim by Housing Management Company,


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4697 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon All,

 

I have recently been issued with a Court Claim, see links below.

 

Basically there is a management company set up for the owners of our flats, and we appoint a company to manage the communal areas. It is that company that we have appointed that have unilaterally decided to take me to court.

 

POC 2 picture by BlurredFX - Photobucket

 

POC 2 picture by BlurredFX - Photobucket

 

I am proposing the send the below letter, and would appreciate any comments. This is very hard and solitary, and I have been in hospital, so would be grateful for some advice.

 

I am not disputing the money I owe to the company (my neighbours essentially), but I am disputing their (the company that has taken initiated the action without consulting the shareholders) right to take the course of action they have sent. As such I need copies of documentation, and also to place points on the record.

 

In the XXX County Court

Claimant -v- BlurredFX

Claim Number: (CLAIM NUMBER)

 

 

Dear XXX

 

CPR 18 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

I have received a recent court claim from your organisation.

 

As far as I am aware your organisation has no right to pursue me in this matter. I am a shareholder of XXXX Management Company, and have no knowledge of your right to pursue me in such a manner.

 

I have spoken with other shareholders of the company and they also are unaware of your right to pursue me in such a manner. They have also expressed their dis-approval at your course of action.

 

I have spoken with the Director of the company of which I am a shareholder (his details here, he lives in the flat next door) and he is also unaware of any mandate you may have to take this course of action. He has asked for copies of such from you, verbally, and I understand none have been forthcoming. He has also expressed his concern at your course of action, and that he does not wish this matter to proceed through the Courts.

 

I have been in Hospital recently and am currently signed off from work.

 

In order to file a defence and counter claim I require some information. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below.

 

The information must be furnished within fourteen days of the receipt of this letter. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the all the documents you intend to rely upon in Court.

 

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

 

a. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company.

 

b. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account.

 

c. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

 

 

d. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

 

 

f. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

 

g. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

 

h. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

i. Copies of statements for the entire duration of your claim.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

 

 

I will require this information within the next fourteen days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

They are claiming for less than £5k, but does this have implications for their claim under s69 of the County Courts Act? Can they apply for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This would appear to be a service charge dispute.

 

What exactly does the POC say ? (I can't read it clearly).

 

Who owns the freehold ? (The land the flats reside on)

 

Have you a copy of your lease ?

 

Have you a breakdown of the costs that you allegedly owe. (P.S. It is important at this stage that you DO NOT formally admit that you owe the amount).

 

I'm assuming the management company concerned is a RTM company that you have jointly set up.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I owe the money, and want to pay it, I just do not want a CCJ to match, so want it forced down the SC track, or thrown out if possible. I have admited nothing as yet, I want the documents they intend to rely upon.

 

They have not sent me an LBA. Is this a legal requirement do you know?

 

The documents have a breakdown on them, but I have rubbed some of them out.

 

The freehold is held by someone else, but they are not concerned with this issue.

 

I do not have a copy of the lease. The aim of my letter it to get them to produce one and all other documents to prove they are eligible to take me to Court - which I suspect they will not.

Edited by BlurredFX
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Several things:

 

The stuff in the letter about manual intervention is not relevant - that is for bank charge claims and is to do with how much it costs them to, say, not pay a direct debit

 

It is probable that the company can take you to court without approval of the other residents as I suspect that the contractual arrangements are that you pay them these service charges

 

There is no need to let them take you to court - if you agree that you owe the money, talk to them and agree a settelement out of court. THey will then discontinue the claim.

 

Yes, s69 would apply and, if a court found in their favour, they wold be awarded 8% interest from the date of default (ie when you should have paid th echarges) until the date of judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are refusing to stop the action, but have stated that if the Director of the residents company asks them to stop, then they will. He is reluctant to get involed but now he may have to.

 

In the mean time I am going to get the letter off to them and also the court, with the bits removed about the manual intervention. See if we can keep this thing in obeyance for a while until I get sorted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I owe the money, and want to pay it, I just do not want a CCJ to match, so want it forced down the SC track, or thrown out if possible. I have admited nothing as yet, I want the documents they intend to rely upon.

 

They have not sent me an LBA. Is this a legal requirement do you know?

 

The documents have a breakdown on them, but I have rubbed some of them out.

 

The freehold is held by someone else, but they are not concerned with this issue.

 

I do not have a copy of the lease. The aim of my letter it to get them to produce one and all other documents to prove they are eligible to take me to Court - which I suspect they will not.

 

I said about not admitting you owe the money because disputes like this are decided by land tribunal courts (LVT), (County Courts will send landlord/service charge related disputes to an LVT court and when decided it will then pass back to the county court ) BUT if you have at all admitted to any monies owing then you will automatically be liable for it. This is laid down in The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

 

(2C) No application under subsection (2A) or (2B) may be made in respect of a matter which—

(a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant,

 

Getting a copy of the lease is most important it will show what, how much , to whom amounts are payable. If yours is lost you can get another from the Land Registry.

 

I'm a bit confused about this, what exactly are you disputing, If you are willing to pay the amount owing then why don't you just pay ?

 

Generally speaking amounts payable for common areas, etc are payable to the freeholder/landlord, they may in turn have passed the day to day running over to a management company, it sounds in your case that you and your fellow flat owners took control of the management side of things via a RTM company, I'm a little unsure if it is then down to the management company or the freeholder/landlord to chase any overdue debts. The usual process is to send you a LBA letters often mentioning serving a section 146 notice (this is the start of repossion proceedings, although in 99.9% of cases it never gets that far, its just a threat).

 

You may like to try The Leasehold Advisory Service - Homepage and Long Leasehold Questions - LandlordZONE Forums

 

Both offer quite in depth info.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys,

 

I will look at the above and doubtless be back with more questions or queries.

 

The money is owed, and I intend to pay it. The Director the our company has been aware of my situation and said not to worry.

 

But now the company we employ has decided to issue Court proceedings. I am trying to get the Director of our company to tell them to stop the Court action. That is the smiplest way forward I believe.

 

When I spoke to the company that has instigated the proceedings, I told the snotty girl I would be in with a letter to deliver in person due to postal issues and time constraints.

 

I turned up and was greeted my the MD, and this company is a large one! Clearly rattled, he was looking to deal with it himself. He was actually a nice guy once we got down to it. But I do not think he has ever been challenged. This site is a life saver!

 

The easiest thing for me is to get the Director of our company to tell them to stop action, which I am hoping to do.

 

All I want is to make arrangements to pay, and avoid a CCJ. The money is essentially owed to my neighbours and is quite embarassing.

 

I will work on what has been suggested in case I have to go down that route.

 

Thanks guys :):)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys,

 

I will look at the above and doubtless be back with more questions or queries.

 

The money is owed, and I intend to pay it. The Director the our company has been aware of my situation and said not to worry.

 

But now the company we employ has decided to issue Court proceedings. I am trying to get the Director of our company to tell them to stop the Court action. That is the smiplest way forward I believe.

 

When I spoke to the company that has instigated the proceedings, I told the snotty girl I would be in with a letter to deliver in person due to postal issues and time constraints.

 

I turned up and was greeted my the MD, and this company is a large one! Clearly rattled, he was looking to deal with it himself. He was actually a nice guy once we got down to it. But I do not think he has ever been challenged. This site is a life saver!

 

The easiest thing for me is to get the Director of our company to tell them to stop action, which I am hoping to do.

 

All I want is to make arrangements to pay, and avoid a CCJ. The money is essentially owed to my neighbours and is quite embarassing.

 

I will work on what has been suggested in case I have to go down that route.

 

Thanks guys :):)

 

Ok..The bits I was refering to are more to do when you dispute large bills, Im in this situation with my landlord/freeholder.

You wouldnt be given a CCJ just like that anyway, before it got to that you'd have the opurtunity to question it in court, pay it off (maybe even in installments). Your case does seem a bit strange and isnt something ive come across in my trawl of LVT court case reports.

 

Good luck

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

Well, I have received nothing from the management company we employ, and the Director of the company set up for the residents hasn't received anything either. He really doesn't want to get involved, he is only the Director because someone had to do it. I don't want to have to force his hand as he is a spot on guy. I suppose if it comes to it, I will have to do my best to persuade him, but right now I prefer not to.

 

What is the best course of action?

 

Do I apply to the Court asking for an Order for them to comply with my CPR request?

 

I do I start to make representations along the line of an Embarrased Defence?

 

Or is there another course of action that would be appropriate?

 

All comments and thoughts welcome, naturally!!

 

FX ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Well, I have received nothing from the management company we employ, and the Director of the company set up for the residents hasn't received anything either. He really doesn't want to get involved, he is only the Director because someone had to do it. I don't want to have to force his hand as he is a spot on guy. I suppose if it comes to it, I will have to do my best to persuade him, but right now I prefer not to.

 

What is the best course of action?

 

Do I apply to the Court asking for an Order for them to comply with my CPR request?

 

I do I start to make representations along the line of an Embarrased Defence?

 

Or is there another course of action that would be appropriate?

 

All comments and thoughts welcome, naturally!!

 

FX ;-)

 

Im a bit confused here.

If you dont dispute the amounts owing then why dont you just pay ?

 

The way it works is that CC will pass the details onto an LVT court, they will decide if you do indeedy owe the amounts and if they are valid, they have no actual powers to force you to pay so it will then be passed back to the CC for that side of things.

 

Basically you either dispute you owe the money or not, the confusion seems to be that you admit you do owe the money, if you have formally admitted this then its game over.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Andy,

 

I have admitted nothing in writing. I want to avoid a CCJ. Are you saying that if I make an agreement to pay then I will not get the CCJ? I would pay if I had the money, but I do not, but I do want to pay it, over a period of time.

 

Otherwise, I intend to thwart them due to their lack of paperwork. It's about avoiding the CCJ, not the money I actually owe.

 

Thanks for you interest.

 

FX

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Blurred FX, this sounds very similar to my situation with a management company.

I have disputed their calculations, but Ive issued a CPR 31 request before it got to court applications.

Theyve basically refused to give details of charges and how they arrived at them.

You need to look through your documents, is there a Deed of Covenant which gives details of what they are allowed to charge?

They cant just issue an invoice with no proof of how that invoice is calculated.

For instance, the Gates they charged you for. You need an original invoice for the Gates, this will show what profit they are making. Are they allowed to make such profits? There must be a document somewhere and it should have been signed in front of witnesses.

The service charges, what are they for? How much have they paid to secure the services against what they are invoicing for? Are they allowed to make a profit on this?

These are all questions / requests you should make in your own CPR request.

Break it down, request original documentation, IE, if they used a contractor to do work, wheres the invoice from the contractor? Did they make profit.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to look through your documents, is there a Deed of Covenant which gives details of what they are allowed to charge?

 

I have no documents what so ever! I may have had some through when I took out the mortgage, but certainly do not have them to hand. This is why i have requested the documents in my CPR letter above.

 

They cant just issue an invoice with no proof of how that invoice is calculated.

 

Nor without the documents to back it up if they want to go to Court.

 

For instance, the Gates they charged you for. You need an original invoice for the Gates, this will show what profit they are making. Are they allowed to make such profits? There must be a document somewhere and it should have been signed in front of witnesses.

 

This could be an interesting avenue.Will look at that as things proceed.

 

These are all questions / requests you should make in your own CPR request.

 

I have already maed a CPR request. Can you make an additional one?

 

I have disputed their calculations, but Ive issued a CPR 31 request before it got to court applications.

 

I though CPR only applied once things were subject to Court proceedings???:-|

 

Do we know if, generally, they are allowed to make a profit?

Edited by BlurredFX
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 31.14 is request for documentation referred to in statement of case.

CPR 31.16 is request before proceedings.

As far as making profits generally, I would have thought there is at the very least a contract governing this set up somewhere. Maybe the Director of your group has a copy.

Even then, they still have to provide proof of their costs.

Then youd be able to see what youve signed up for. This'll give you a much better idea of where you stand in this.

On another note, what are you time limits for submitting any defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Andy,

 

I have admitted nothing in writing. I want to avoid a CCJ. Are you saying that if I make an agreement to pay then I will not get the CCJ? I would pay if I had the money, but I do not, but I do want to pay it, over a period of time.

 

Otherwise, I intend to thwart them due to their lack of paperwork. It's about avoiding the CCJ, not the money I actually owe.

 

Thanks for you interest.

 

FX

 

A CCJ would be quite a way off, actually normally landlords would normally threaten you with a section 146 notice which is basically the beginingings of the repossion of your property (although this is very rare), I dont think this would apply in your case though.

 

Of course if you pay there will be no CCJ as there will be no money owing !

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

My CPR was under section 18. Not sure of the differences, I just adjusted a template from the site.

 

The point I am at is that I have made the CPR 18 request to them, just over two weeks ago, and nothing had been heard from them since.

 

How is best to proceed? The point above are very welcome and useful at the next stage, potentially, but what do i do NOW???

 

When I spoke to the Management Company (the ones we employ for the communal areas) he mentioned something that sounded similar to the s146 you mention above Andy, so it might be relevant.

 

As I said, it is all about avoiding the CCJ. I have put in a CPR 18 request and had nothing back whatsoever. How do I approach the Court now? Embarrased defence? Seek an order forcing the compliance with teh CPR request? Any other course of action?

 

Thanks in advance...

 

FX

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so what time limit did you give them to respond?

Maybe a CPR31.14 will help but state that as the case is trackless, they are still obligated to supply the documents requested. You can add the stuff I suggested, (this'll probably put the wind up them). In your letters you can put that you intend to highlight to the court their failure to supply requested documentation and ask the court to order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delay

 

I gave them 12 days which has well and truly expired, and still nothing from them.

 

Sounds to me bazaar that you are quite a bit further with this than I am. I wzs just hoping to have it thrown out when they failed to produce the documents.

 

They have launched a claim, I have asked for the info in order that I can defend the claim. They have not provided it. I have had no communication from the Court.

 

Are you suggesting I submit a further CPR request under 31.14?

 

Mine was under CPR 18

 

Obtaining further information

 

18.1

 

(1) The court may at any time order a party to –

(a) clarify any matter which is in dispute in the proceedings; or

 

(b) give additional information in relation to any such matter,

 

whether or not the matter is contained or referred to in a statement of case.

 

Basically I am requesting the info they refer to. And disputing their eligibility entirely. Simple as. Provide the documents please. I know nothing of this is. That is the essence of my request

 

What benefit would a CPR 31.14 request bring at this stage? Or is it essentially looking at the same thing, but from a different angle?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am thinking that in my circumstances, the CPR31 and CPR18 would achieve the same thing.

 

Is it time to go ro an embarrased defence or seek an order from the Court, or make a new CPR 31 request?

 

I am thinking asking the Court to order them to show the docs, and if they do not, then Embarased Defence it is.

 

Thoughts anyone??:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...