Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

gross misconduct appeal on thurs the 13th please HELP advice needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5365 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi l wonder if anybody can give me advice on gross misconduct l have been dismissed and have got a appeal on thurs 13th aug l was on a final written for sick for six months still had about 3 months to go but was seen smoking shelter 6 mins before lunch thinking it was my lunch or near as. they say this is gross misconduct in there eyes breach of rules.It is gross misconduct to smoke outside of break and was dismissed appealing on thurs. In my appeal letter l stated l thought i was break and some of the clocks read different in factory anyway. And have been there 10 years. There were other people 2 mins before there break aswell but they just got a verbal warning.this happened on the 22nd of july and they didnt dismiss till the 3rd august l went to Citizens advice and they think l should have been suspended if they consider it that serious but there were 13 days before l got dismissed l also said l feel this is discriminated against as there were others there aswell. what do l say as l have not got myself a union rep. please any advice!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before we get to what to say at the appeal meeting could you please just clarify:

1. After the smoking incident on the 22nd July, did you carry on working for the rest of the day?

2. Did you continue working your normal days/shifts from the 22nd to the 3rd August?

3. Did you attend a disciplinary meeting where you were given an opportunity to defend yourself?

If so;

a) When.

b) Were you told before this meeting that the incident was regarded as Gross Misconduct or at least warned that it was considered very serious?

c) Were you informed that you had the right to be accompanied by a work colleague or union rep?

4. Have you been given the reason for your dismissal in writing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for replying

1.yes l did carry on working for the rest of the day.

2.yes l did carry on working from the 22nd of July till Aug 3rd

3 yes l did go to a meeting after lunch asking me if l had been smoking.He said answer the questions very carefully as if it was serious l said l thought it was lunch break. they said they had three people who had seen me at 23 min past when it was break at 12.30 and it was on CCTV and l asked lf this was going to discipline me he said hed look into it.

l then got a letter on Mon the 27th July asking me to go to a disciplinary on the 3rd of Aug saying l was in breech of the smoking policy which can lead to summary dismissal for gross misconduct and l can be accompanied by a union rep or a work colleague.

On the 3rd l went to the hearing and said l thought it was break and it was not intentional.

They said didnt l think it was strange that there was nobody there when l went out. l said a few minutes later two others came out so thought l had done nothing wrong.

I mentioned about the clocks being different in various parts of the factory which they are.

The outcome of that hearing was a breech of the smoking policy outside of break and l was dismissed for gross misconduct which they have given to me in writing.

In my appeal letter l said l find this unfair and harsh and feel discriminated as there were others they on CCTV aswell. And have seeked legal advice which l did.

Trying to think of right things to say at the appeal. like arent supposed to suspend me if my actions are that bad.

Any advice please? all this over 6 mins!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phil9,

have a look on the acas website www.acas.org.uk

There is good info on there which you may find useful.

To be honest it does seem harsh, but having said that i dont have knowledge of your workplace or its rules.

I take it you have a contract, and if so, have a look to see what it states regarding your problem.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK a couple more questions:

1. After the hearing on 3rd August did you have to leave immediately?

If not what happened.

2. Do you know what is happening about your pay?

I mean will you be paid to 3rd August (plus any holiday entitlement due).

Or, will they pay you for the rest of the week or is there any other arrangement in relation to your pay that you are aware of?

 

bazak makes a good point

Does it say in your contract that breeching the smoking policy may be considered to be Gross Misconduct?

If not, ask for a copy of the company handbook and check there.

 

If you don't already have them you should ask for copies of all notes that the company have in relation to both the investigation and the disciplinary hearing. Tell them that you need them to help you prepare for your appeal.

Do this by phone first thing on Monday and offer to come and collect them.

If they refuse to provide the notes send a letter asking for them again. Send it by special delivery, so that you can prove that that received it the next day.

 

Appeal Meeting

If you are on good terms with either of the people who had verbal warnings for that day I suggest you ask one of them to accompany you to the appeal to take notes for you.

Whether you choose one of the above people or if you prefer to be accompanied by another work colleague you need to get in touch with your employer as soon as possible to request that you may be accompanied by the person you select.

Your employer should not refuse your reasonable request.

 

If the smoking policy does not specify that a breech of it may be considered Gross Misconduct then this is your first line of defence at the meeting.

 

Next, you should ask them if they agree that there are small variations in the time shown on the clocks in different parts of the factory.

If the person holding the meeting says that they are unaware of this then ask everyone else in the room the same question.

 

I assume that in the written reason for dismissal that you have been given that is does not specify '6 minutes'.

Ask why other people who committed the same offence were merely given verbal warnings.

Surely, if a breech of the smoking policy = Gross Misconduct, all of you should have been sacked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I type slowly so I didn't see your post #5.

 

But still an employer has an obligation to be fair and consistent in all disciplinary actions, especially with dismissal, and if it's a verbal warning for the other two then surely you should receive the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

The thing do now is to chase up their notes the way I described in post #6.

Come back on Monday and let us know how you get on.

 

Keep checking here, in the meantime, as there are employment specialist that hang around these parts.

 

If you like I could prepare a statement for you to take to the appeal meeting that you could hand over, use to refer to or both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes something to refer would be good. lm only a engineer l don't normally have to do this sort of things cheers for your help and will keep an eye on the forum thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...