Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital one CCA received, please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In responsde to my cca request, fitst had a letter saying they were asiling Capotal One for it, now has a leter saying Capotal one say they have bno aggrement so Cabot say no enforcenent unleszs Capiotal one find the cca and then theywill chase agaim, is this good? Or is it likekly to appear,the cca I mean?

Edited by snagpuss
Link to post
Share on other sites

its good for now, keep the letter safe, crabot will no doubt try and pass it down the food chain.

 

however if they do produce then you are leable unless the agreement is rubbish and knowing crap1 that is highly likely

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Lowells have just sent me my credit agreement for Capital One, i cant scan it im afriad so will try and explain whats in it

 

Firstly - a page stating Credit Agreement - please issue to to me a Capital one crdit card etc, goes on about fraud and CRA's

I ahve read the T&C's and if my application is accepted I agrree to be bound etc etc

 

I have signed and dated it, they have signed it and there is a little box saying your right to cancel/

 

2nd page - credit agreement regulated by CCA Act 1974 which has paragraphs on monthly statements, financial and related particluras inclduing examples of credit limits and APR's and another one saying Use of Iformation and a paragraph about "Your Rights and "Loss or Misuse of card"

 

Then, weirdly, I have got numereous typed sheets of A4 paper, that look they have just been typed up and could be anybodies, just [printed off a printer - not at all like the documents above, there are 9 pages and and are entitled Terms and Conditions, I DID NOT get these when I had the card. I could type them all up myself and they would look exactly the same, these pages include, Use of your information, issueing the card and credit card cheques, extra carholders, credit limit, personal identification number and password, using the card and credit card cheques, monthly payment, monthly statement, prepayment, finincial particulars, other charges and default charges, foreign trnsactions, optional CO PPI, default, lost or stolen cards and pin, notice and address, variation, closing your account, ending the agreement, general, definitions, governing law, finanical and related particulars

 

Please somebody help, where do I stand with this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells have just sent me my credit agreement for Capital One, i cant scan it im afriad so will try and explain whats in it

 

Firstly - a page stating Credit Agreement - please issue to to me a Capital one crdit card etc, goes on about fraud and CRA's

I ahve read the T&C's and if my application is accepted I agrree to be bound etc etc

 

I have signed and dated it, they have signed it and there is a little box saying your right to cancel/

 

2nd page - credit agreement regulated by CCA Act 1974 which has paragraphs on monthly statements, financial and related particluras inclduing examples of credit limits and APR's and another one saying Use of Iformation and a paragraph about "Your Rights and "Loss or Misuse of card"

 

Then, weirdly, I have got numereous typed sheets of A4 paper, that look they have just been typed up and could be anybodies, just [printed off a printer - not at all like the documents above, there are 9 pages and and are entitled Terms and Conditions, I DID NOT get these when I had the card. I could type them all up myself and they would look exactly the same, these pages include, Use of your information, issueing the card and credit card cheques, extra carholders, credit limit, personal identification number and password, using the card and credit card cheques, monthly payment, monthly statement, prepayment, finincial particulars, other charges and default charges, foreign trnsactions, optional CO PPI, default, lost or stolen cards and pin, notice and address, variation, closing your account, ending the agreement, general, definitions, governing law, finanical and related particulars

 

Please somebody help, where do I stand with this forumbox_top_left.gifforumbox_top_tile.gifforumbox_top_right.gifforumbox_left_tile.gifCredit Report Click link to open in new window.

forumbox_right_tile.gifforumbox_bottom_left.gifforumbox_bottom_tile.gifforumbox_bottom_right.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Snagpuss,

 

When did you apply online ?

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Snagpuss,

 

Listen, they're deffo not worth crying over, that's the game they play.

 

Can you scan what they've sent you onto this thread.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Edited by maroondevo52
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

The good news is that they still need a SIGNED CCA to enforce via the court :)

 

 

But this is one, isn't it? I have signed it it, the first page has my name and address printed on it but I have signed and dated it and there is something like a signature in their box :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i may be wromg but doesnt the document all have to be on one document instead of the lots that i've got, how can they say the second page relates to the first page where i have signed it or i understood it completely wrong, which is likely :Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

the first page doesnt no, the second page which is copied doesnt give an exact credit limit, just examples, the second page also states about payments but there is no box either ticked or unticked for PPI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, first of all, don't waste your tears on them, they have no powers to do anything to you.

 

I am dealing with this load with regard to 4 Crap 1 accounts (2 are mine and 2 are my sister's) so I know how you feel, I let my sister open her letters, and look at her face then she hands them to me and I laugh and point out all the things that are incorrect or just plain lies they are spouting.

 

We have had the typed Terms and Conditions, which, as you say, relate to nothing so they can be disregarded.

 

Was an Agreement actually sent in the snail mail for you to sign and return? Or, did you just apply online, receive a letter and card to say your Application had been accepted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

cone.jpg

 

 

yes i just applied online, then got this page to sign, it looks like this one which I've copied from another thread (hope Sunflower doesnt mind) then they sent me the card. Don't know how to make it bigger

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, Sorry you were missed.

 

It would be easier if you could find someone with a scanner as the experts can't really say with what you have written.

 

Do you have a digital camera?

 

Does the page with your signature on have any terms and conditions or any way of linking that page to any other?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you both for answering, i found one last night and i posted it on oanther thread here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/204172-crapital-one-cabot-have.html

 

 

i dont know how i ende up with two threads, minds all over the place.

There doesnt seem to be linking the first page with the seccond if that makes sense. It was taken out in 2005, applied online then got a form to sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read some of Sunflowers thread regarding Capital one, there seems to be an issue with the "Section 23" as mentioned on the first page, when I go to the second page, there is a section 1& 2 and then there is, well I don't know how to describe it, it look likes it is meant to say "section 23" but...................it looks like they have altered is, the 3 is quite clear but just before it, is another number that looks its made to look like a 2 but it looks like it was a 3 first (its has been def altered) then there is a 3 further along the the line than numnbers of the Sections 1 and 2.

 

Also, all the typed documents which list all the suposed T&C's, there are two section 10's, one entitled FINANCIAL AND RELATED PRODUCTS and another one entotled PAYMENT and SECTION 23 is entitled GOVERNING LAW :idea:

 

Please can anybody help, why if they have included what they think are the Terms and Conditions relating to my account, why have they sent another 9 pages containing them, these are typed out as you would type a letter or document, no mention of Capital One or myself on them whatsoever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...